• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准 A:人格障碍的替代 DSM-5 模型中的人格功能水平。

Criterion A: Level of personality functioning in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University.

Computer Science and Engineering Division, University of Michigan.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2022 Jul;13(4):305-315. doi: 10.1037/per0000551.

DOI:10.1037/per0000551
PMID:35787111
Abstract

Criterion A, as represented by Level of Personality Functioning (LPF), offers a means by which to conceptualize the core impairment in self and interpersonal functioning that distinguishes personality disorder (PD) from other forms of psychopathology. One of the most widely cited criticisms of the current Section II in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition categorical diagnostic system is the high level of comorbidity among the categorical PD diagnoses. The Section III alternative Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition model for PDs (AMPD) addresses this problem by assessing the commonalities of the PDs using a single severity continuum, represented in the AMPD by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS), which comprises both self and interpersonal pathology. Since its initial introduction, the LPFS has generated an expansive literature base and has also seen significant advancements in its measurement, including both semistructured and self-report methods. Such studies have generally demonstrated that the LPFS can be rated reliably, across both experienced and inexperienced raters, and demonstrates strong validity as evidenced by associations with relevant criterion variables and demonstrations of predictive and clinical utility. This review offers a brief history of the conceptualization and development of Criterion A and the LPFS, describes the major advancements in its measurement, and provides a summary of the status of the empirical literature regarding Criterion A's structure, reliability, and validity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

标准 A(以人格功能水平[LPF]表示)为区分人格障碍(PD)和其他形式的精神病理学提供了一种概念化自我和人际功能核心障碍的方法。目前《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)第二部分的一个最常被引用的批评是,分类 PD 诊断之间存在很高的共病率。DSM-5 替代人格障碍诊断系统(AMPD)通过使用单一严重程度连续体来评估 PD 的共性来解决这个问题,该连续体在 AMPD 中由人格功能水平量表(LPFS)表示,它包括自我和人际病理学。自最初引入以来,LPFS 已经产生了广泛的文献基础,并且在其测量方面也取得了重大进展,包括半结构化和自我报告方法。这些研究通常表明,LPFS 可以由经验丰富和缺乏经验的评估者可靠地进行评分,并且具有很强的有效性,因为它与相关标准变量相关联,并展示了预测和临床实用性。这篇综述简要介绍了标准 A 和 LPFS 的概念化和发展,描述了其测量方面的主要进展,并总结了关于标准 A 的结构、可靠性和有效性的实证文献的现状。(美国心理协会,2022)。

相似文献

1
Criterion A: Level of personality functioning in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.标准 A:人格障碍的替代 DSM-5 模型中的人格功能水平。
Personal Disord. 2022 Jul;13(4):305-315. doi: 10.1037/per0000551.
2
An evaluation of DSM-5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology.DSM-5 第三部分人格障碍标准 A(损害)在解释精神病理学方面的评估。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Oct;31(10):1181-1191. doi: 10.1037/pas0000620.
3
Interrater reliability of criterion A of the alternative model for personality disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition-Section III): A meta-analysis.人格障碍替代模型标准 A 的评定者间信度(《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版)-第三部分》):一项荟萃分析。
Personal Disord. 2023 Nov;14(6):613-624. doi: 10.1037/per0000631. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Is the alternative model for personality disorders able to capture avoidant personality disorder according to Section II of the DSM-5? A systematic review.DSM-5 第二部分能否用替代人格障碍模型捕捉到回避型人格障碍?一项系统评价。
Personal Disord. 2022 Jul;13(4):412-417. doi: 10.1037/per0000553.
5
Mentalization and criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders: Results from a clinical and nonclinical sample.心理化与人格障碍替代模型的标准 A:来自临床和非临床样本的结果。
Personal Disord. 2020 May;11(3):191-201. doi: 10.1037/per0000356. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
6
Reliability, structure, and validity of module I (personality functioning) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders (SCID-5-AMPD-I).DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型结构临床访谈模块 I(人格功能)的可靠性、结构和有效性(SCID-5-AMPD-I)。
Personal Disord. 2023 May;14(3):287-299. doi: 10.1037/per0000576. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
Assessing Criterion A in adolescents using the Semistructured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5.使用 DSM-5 人格功能半结构式访谈评估青少年的标准 A。
Personal Disord. 2021 Jul;12(4):312-319. doi: 10.1037/per0000454. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, personality disorders and the alternative model: Prediction of naturalistically observed behavior, interpersonal functioning, and psychiatric symptoms, 1 year later.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版、人格障碍与替代模型:对一年后自然观察到的行为、人际功能和精神症状的预测
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):361-370. doi: 10.1037/per0000677. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
9
Psychometric Evaluation of the Polish adaptation of a Self-Report Form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS-SR).DSM-5 人格功能水平自评量表(LPFS-SR)波兰语适应自评量表的心理计量学评估。
Psychiatr Pol. 2023 Apr 30;57(2):261-274. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/142888.
10
Deconstructing criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders.解构人格障碍替代模型的标准 A。
Personal Disord. 2021 Jul;12(4):320-330. doi: 10.1037/per0000431. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Do trajectories of self- and interpersonal functioning identify a core underlying developmental pathway for personality pathology in late adolescence and early adulthood?自我与人际功能的轨迹能否识别出青少年晚期和成年早期人格病理学潜在的核心发展路径?
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1037/abn0001044.
2
An Investigation of Longitudinal Measurement Invariance and Item Response Theory Analysis of the LPFS-BF 2.0 in a Large Clinical Norwegian Sample.挪威大型临床样本中LPFS-BF 2.0的纵向测量不变性调查及项目反应理论分析
Personal Ment Health. 2025 Aug;19(3):e70032. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70032.
3
Level of personality functioning scale-brief form 2.0: validity and reliability of the Chinese version.
人格功能水平量表简版2.0:中文版的效度与信度
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07081-y.
4
A Network Analysis of Personality Traits in Adults with and Without Specific Learning Disorders.有特定学习障碍和无特定学习障碍成年人的人格特质网络分析
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10146-6.
5
Neurobiological correlates of personality dimensions in borderline personality disorder using graph analysis of functional connectivity.使用功能连接性的图形分析研究边缘型人格障碍中人格维度的神经生物学相关性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 12;15(1):12623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85989-x.
6
How can qualitative in-depth interviews optimize cross-cultural measurement of academic resilience?定性深入访谈如何优化学术复原力的跨文化测量?
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 20;16:1444978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1444978. eCollection 2025.
7
Wherefrom and Whither PD? Recent Developments and Future Possibilities in DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnosis.人格障碍诊断何去何从?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版和《国际疾病分类》第11版中人格障碍诊断的最新进展与未来可能性
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2025 May;27(5):267-277. doi: 10.1007/s11920-025-01602-y. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
8
Mental Health and Personality Functioning of People With Probable Personality Disorder Who Have Coexisting Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.患有复杂性创伤后应激障碍的疑似人格障碍患者的心理健康和人格功能
Personal Ment Health. 2025 Feb;19(1):e70010. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70010.
9
Personality Functioning Strengths: Reimagining Personality Strengths in Mental Health.人格功能优势:重新构想心理健康中的人格优势。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 Feb 12:02537176241309033. doi: 10.1177/02537176241309033.
10
Severity Benchmarks for the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) in Polish Adults.波兰成年人个性功能量表简版2.0(LPFS-BF 2.0)水平的严重程度基准。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;13(3):340. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030340.