Thiyagarajan Arulmani, James Tyler G, Marzo Roy Rillera
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):220. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01229-x. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
Depression, anxiety, and stress continue to be among the largest burdens of disease, globally. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) is a shortened version of DASS-41 developed to measure these mental health conditions. The DASS-41 has strong evidence of validity and reliability in multiple contexts. However, the DASS-21, and the resulting item properties, has been explored less in terms of modern test theories. One such theory is Item Response Theory (IRT), and we use IRT models to explore latent item and person traits of each DASS-21 sub-scale among people living in Malaysia. Specifically, we aimed to assess Classical Test Theory and IRT properties including dimensionality, internal consistency (reliability), and item-level properties. We conducted a web-based cross-sectional study and sent link-based questionnaires to people aged 18 and above in a private university and requested to roll out the link. Overall and individual sub-scales' Cronbach's alpha of the DASS-21 indicates an excellent internal consistency. The average inter-item correlation and corrected inter-item correlations for each of the sub-scales indicated acceptable discrimination. On average, DASS-21 total scores and sub-scale scores were significantly higher among female participants than males. The Graded Response Model had better empirical fit to sub-scale response data. Raw summated and latent (IRT estimated) scores of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress sub-scales, and overall DASS-21 were strongly correlated. Thus, this study provides evidence of validity supporting the use of the DASS-21 as a mental health screening tool among Malaysians. Specifically, standard error of measurement was minimized to provide robust evidence of potential utility in identifying participants who are and are not experiencing these mental health issues. Additional research is warranted to ensure that test content culturally appropriate and accurately measuring cultural norms of depression, anxiety, and stress.
抑郁症、焦虑症和压力仍然是全球最大的疾病负担之一。抑郁、焦虑和压力量表21项(DASS - 21)是为测量这些心理健康状况而开发的DASS - 41的简化版本。DASS - 41在多种背景下都有很强的效度和信度证据。然而,就现代测试理论而言,对DASS - 21及其所得项目属性的探索较少。其中一种理论是项目反应理论(IRT),我们使用IRT模型来探索马来西亚居民中每个DASS - 21子量表的潜在项目和个体特征。具体而言,我们旨在评估经典测试理论和IRT属性,包括维度性、内部一致性(信度)和项目层面的属性。我们进行了一项基于网络的横断面研究,向一所私立大学18岁及以上的人群发送基于链接的问卷,并要求他们转发该链接。DASS - 21总体及各个子量表的克朗巴哈系数表明其内部一致性极佳。每个子量表的平均项目间相关性和校正后的项目间相关性表明具有可接受的区分度。平均而言,女性参与者的DASS - 21总分和子量表得分显著高于男性。等级反应模型对各子量表反应数据的实证拟合效果更好。抑郁、焦虑和压力子量表以及DASS - 21总体的原始求和得分与潜在(IRT估计)得分高度相关。因此,本研究为支持将DASS - 21用作马来西亚人心理健康筛查工具提供了效度证据。具体而言,测量标准误差被最小化,为识别有或没有经历这些心理健康问题的参与者提供了潜在效用的有力证据。有必要进行更多研究,以确保测试内容在文化上合适,并准确测量抑郁、焦虑和压力的文化规范。