• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估创伤后预防服务和创伤后预防模式的可接受性:系统评价。

Evaluating Postvention Services and the Acceptability of Models of Postvention: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Omega (Westport). 2024 Dec;90(2):865-905. doi: 10.1177/00302228221112723. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1177/00302228221112723
PMID:35790465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11487908/
Abstract

Suicide is a major public health issue that increases the risk of suicide for those bereaved by suicide themselves. There is a lack of evaluation of the effectiveness and acceptability of suicide postvention services supporting those bereaved by suicide. This review aimed to assess evaluations of postvention services supporting those bereaved by suicide and the acceptability of methods of postvention. Searches of peer-reviewed literature identified 36 studies for inclusion. 22 studies evaluated specific postvention services, 14 evaluated models of postvention. Using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, mixed-methods and qualitative postvention evaluation and acceptability research produce high-quality studies. Studies rated as low quality reflect poor reporting, rather than ineffective services. Further evaluation of community-based postvention services within the UK is needed. This would evidence that services in the UK are effective in supporting those bereaved by suicide. Evaluation would benefit services in accessing funding, improve service development and provide holistic support.

摘要

自杀是一个主要的公共卫生问题,会增加自杀者家属自杀的风险。目前缺乏对支持自杀者家属的自杀预防后服务的有效性和可接受性的评估。本综述旨在评估支持自杀者家属的预防后服务的评估以及预防后方法的可接受性。对同行评议文献的检索确定了 36 项纳入研究。22 项研究评估了特定的预防后服务,14 项研究评估了预防后的模式。使用混合方法评估工具,混合方法和定性预防后评估和可接受性研究产生了高质量的研究。被评为低质量的研究反映了报告质量差,而不是服务无效。英国需要进一步评估基于社区的预防后服务。这将证明英国的服务在支持自杀者家属方面是有效的。评估将有助于服务获得资金,改善服务发展,并提供全面的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e4e/11487908/1ccce57a9a82/10.1177_00302228221112723-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e4e/11487908/1ccce57a9a82/10.1177_00302228221112723-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e4e/11487908/1ccce57a9a82/10.1177_00302228221112723-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Postvention Services and the Acceptability of Models of Postvention: A Systematic Review.评估创伤后预防服务和创伤后预防模式的可接受性:系统评价。
Omega (Westport). 2024 Dec;90(2):865-905. doi: 10.1177/00302228221112723. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
Continuing Bonds after Loss by Suicide: A Systematic Review.自杀后持续的联系:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;19(5):2963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052963.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
5
Trying to keep alive a non-traumatizing memory of the deceased: A meta-synthesis on the interpretation of loss in suicide-bereaved family members, their coping strategies and the effects on them.试图保留对逝者非创伤性的记忆:对自杀身亡者家属的丧失的解释、应对策略及其对他们的影响的综合分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Apr;30(2):182-207. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12866. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
9
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
10
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A suicide bereavement model: based on a meta-ethnography of the experiences of adult suicide loss survivors.一种自杀丧亲模型:基于对成年自杀身亡者幸存者经历的元民族志研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 14;13:1596961. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1596961. eCollection 2025.
2
Measuring What Outcomes Matters Most to People When Accessing Suicide Postvention Support: A Qualitative Study.衡量人们在获得自杀后干预支持时最重要的结果:一项定性研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Aug;61(6):1115-1125. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01452-1. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3
Implementation of suicide bereavement support: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Being pro-active in meeting the needs of suicide-bereaved survivors: results from a systematic audit in Montréal.主动满足自杀幸存者的需求:蒙特利尔系统审核的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 10;20(1):1534. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09636-y.
2
Children and young people who die by suicide: childhood-related antecedents, gender differences and service contact.自杀死亡的儿童和青少年:与童年相关的先兆、性别差异及服务接触
BJPsych Open. 2020 May 11;6(3):e49. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.33.
3
Evaluating the Outcomes for Bereaved People Supported by a Community-Based Suicide Bereavement Service.
实施自杀丧亲者支持:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 14;12:1474641. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1474641. eCollection 2024.
4
Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide.支持自杀丧亲者的干预措施各组成部分的感知有效性
Crisis. 2025 Mar;46(2):106-120. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000978. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
5
The Needs, Use and Expectations of People Bereaved by Suicide Regarding Online Resources: An Online Survey.自杀死亡者亲友对在线资源的需求、使用情况和期望:一项在线调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 26;19(19):12156. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912156.
评估社区自杀哀伤服务支持下的丧亲者的结果。
Crisis. 2020 Nov;41(6):437-444. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000658. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
4
Youth Suicide Bereavement and the Continuum of Risk.青少年自杀丧亲和风险的连续性。
Crisis. 2020 Nov;41(6):483-489. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000653. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
5
Effectiveness of interventions for people bereaved through suicide: a systematic review of controlled studies of grief, psychosocial and suicide-related outcomes.干预措施对自杀致丧亲者的效果:对悲伤、心理社会和自杀相关结局的对照研究的系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2020-z.
6
Providing support following exposure to suicide: A mixed method study.自杀暴露后的支持:混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):965-972. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12713. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Five Months Follow-up Study of School-based Crisis Intervention for Korean High School Students Who Experienced a Peer Suicide.基于学校的危机干预对经历同伴自杀的韩国高中生的五个月随访研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 May 30;33(28):e192. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e192. eCollection 2018 Jul 9.
8
The Usage of Digital Resources by Swedish Suicide Bereaved in Their Grief Work: A Survey Study.瑞典自杀身亡者亲属在悲伤工作中使用数字资源的情况:一项调查研究。
Omega (Westport). 2020 Jun;81(2):272-297. doi: 10.1177/0030222818765807. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
How Many People Are Exposed to Suicide? Not Six.有多少人接触过自杀?不是六个人。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019 Apr;49(2):529-534. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12450. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Mindfulness-based weekend retreats for people bereaved by suicide (Panta Rhei): A pilot feasibility study.基于正念的自杀丧亲者周末静修(Panta Rhei):一项试点可行性研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2019 Mar;92(1):39-56. doi: 10.1111/papt.12175. Epub 2018 Mar 6.