Suppr超能文献

卫生专业教育中的同理心:有效之处、差距与改进领域。

Empathy in health professions education: What works, gaps and areas for improvement.

作者信息

Samarasekera Dujeepa D, Lee Shuh Shing, Yeo Jillian H T, Yeo Su Ping, Ponnamperuma Gominda

机构信息

Centre for Medical Education (CenMED), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2023 Jan;57(1):86-101. doi: 10.1111/medu.14865. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Developing a physician equipped with both technical and affective skills is crucial in ensuring quality patient care. Of these skills, nurturing empathy is a key skill that has been studied in great detail, particularly among medical undergraduates. Despite numerous studies trending the changes in empathy, the results are often contradictory or confusing. Our study aims to find what interventions are effective to inculcate empathy in both undergraduate and postgraduate medical education and suggest areas for improvement.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted on the interventions in nurturing empathy in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Original research articles and systematic reviews with clear interventions and outcomes were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 44 articles were reviewed. About 44% (n = 18) of the studies used a mixture of different approaches as their interventions. Some interventions were anchored by specific topics: Seven papers focusing on communication skills, three papers on humanities, and three on arts. A majority of the interventions (60%; n = 26) were implemented over a span of time as compared to studies which suggested a one-off intervention (30%; n = 12). Of the 26 papers in which the interventions were enforced over a period of time, 62% (n = 16) indicated an increase in student empathy whereas 16% (n = 4) indicated no changes in empathy post-intervention. On the contrary, 50% (n = 6) of the one-off interventions revealed no significant change in student empathy. Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) is widely used in measuring student empathy postintervention, but approximately 41% of the studies included measuring tools other than JSE.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedagogical methods that invoke thought processes related to the affective domain of learning and experiential learning are more effective than the didactic methods of teaching and learning. Multimodal mixed-methods approach that combine different pedagogical interventions is more likely to bring about the desired results.

摘要

引言

培养具备技术和情感技能的医生对于确保高质量的患者护理至关重要。在这些技能中,培养同理心是一项已得到深入研究的关键技能,尤其是在医学本科生中。尽管有大量研究追踪同理心的变化,但结果往往相互矛盾或令人困惑。我们的研究旨在找出哪些干预措施在本科和研究生医学教育中有效灌输同理心,并提出改进领域。

方法

对本科和研究生医学教育中培养同理心的干预措施进行了叙述性综述。研究纳入了具有明确干预措施和结果的原始研究文章和系统综述。

结果

共审查了44篇文章。约44%(n = 18)的研究使用了不同方法的组合作为干预措施。一些干预措施以特定主题为基础:七篇论文关注沟通技巧,三篇论文关注人文学科,三篇论文关注艺术。与建议一次性干预的研究(30%;n = 12)相比,大多数干预措施(60%;n = 26)是在一段时间内实施的。在26篇干预措施在一段时间内实施的论文中,62%(n = 16)表明学生同理心有所增加,而16%(n = 4)表明干预后同理心没有变化。相反,50%(n = 6)的一次性干预显示学生同理心没有显著变化。杰斐逊同理心量表(JSE)被广泛用于测量干预后学生的同理心,但约41%的研究包括了JSE以外的测量工具。

结论

引发与学习情感领域相关的思维过程和体验式学习的教学方法比讲授式教学方法更有效。结合不同教学干预措施的多模式混合方法更有可能带来预期结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验