Schwartz Amy M, Mackeprang Julia Montague, Mead Paul S, Hinckley Alison F
Bacterial Diseases Branch, Division of Vector Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Association of Schools of Public Health (ASPH), Washington, DC, USA.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2022 Nov;69(7):777-791. doi: 10.1111/zph.12984. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
Lyme disease, the most commonly reported vector-borne disease in the United States, is caused by the bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi and is transmitted through the bite of an infected blacklegged tick. In the absence of a licensed vaccine, the prevention of Lyme disease relies heavily on limiting tick exposure. Methods for limiting tick exposure include personal protection measures such as repellent use, wearing protective clothing, avoiding areas where ticks may be present, bathing after exposure to tick habitat and performing regular tick checks. Public health officials typically recommend all these personal protection measures; however, there is limited evidence to promote one behaviour or practice over another. The focus of this article is to review available literature that examines the effectiveness of recommended personal protection measures to prevent Lyme and other Ixodes-transmitted diseases in humans. Articles included in this review were identified through Google Scholar and PubMed searches using specific search terms. We identified over 56,000 articles using Google Scholar and PubMed searches. Of those, 16 studies fit our criteria for inclusion and were reviewed in their entirety. Among the personal protection measures evaluated, no intervention was predominantly or consistently effective across studies, demonstrating that, currently, there is no single best method for primary prevention of Ixodes-transmitted diseases in the United States. Frequently recommended practices such as tick checks, repellent use and protective clothing had mixed results across studies. Study design differences limited comparability among studies, and sample sizes for these studies may have been too small to detect statistically significant results even if a prevention method was effective. Though many of the reviewed personal protection measures are frequently recommended to the public, limited evidence demonstrates their ability to prevent tick-borne disease. Additional standardized studies are needed to evaluate personal protection measures.
莱姆病是美国报告最多的媒介传播疾病,由伯氏疏螺旋体细菌引起,通过受感染的黑脚蜱叮咬传播。在没有许可疫苗的情况下,莱姆病的预防在很大程度上依赖于减少蜱虫接触。减少蜱虫接触的方法包括个人防护措施,如使用驱虫剂、穿着防护服、避免蜱虫可能出现的区域、接触蜱虫栖息地后洗澡以及定期进行蜱虫检查。公共卫生官员通常推荐所有这些个人防护措施;然而,促进一种行为或做法优于另一种行为或做法的证据有限。本文的重点是回顾现有文献,这些文献研究了推荐的个人防护措施预防人类莱姆病和其他由硬蜱传播疾病的有效性。本综述纳入的文章是通过使用特定搜索词在谷歌学术和PubMed数据库中检索确定的。我们通过谷歌学术和PubMed检索确定了超过56000篇文章。其中,16项研究符合我们的纳入标准并进行了全面综述。在所评估的个人防护措施中,没有一种干预措施在各项研究中主要或始终有效,这表明目前在美国,没有单一的最佳方法用于一级预防硬蜱传播的疾病。在各项研究中,蜱虫检查、使用驱虫剂和穿着防护服等经常被推荐的做法结果不一。研究设计的差异限制了各研究之间的可比性,而且这些研究的样本量可能太小,即使一种预防方法有效,也无法检测到具有统计学意义的结果。尽管许多被综述的个人防护措施经常被推荐给公众,但有限的证据表明它们预防蜱传疾病的能力。需要更多的标准化研究来评估个人防护措施。