Suppr超能文献

比较 COVID-19 与甲型流感(H7N9)病毒感染患者的急性呼吸窘迫综合征。

Comparison of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19 and influenza A (H7N9) virus infection.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;122:593-598. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.06.053. Epub 2022 Jul 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compared the clinical features of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by COVID-19 and H7N9 virus infections.

METHODS

Clinical data of 100 patients with COVID-19 and 46 patients with H7N9 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Elevated inflammatory indices and coagulation disorders were more common in COVID-19-ARDS group than in the H7N9-ARDS group. The median interval from illness onset to ARDS development was shorter in H7N9-ARDS. The PaO/FiO level was lower in H7N9-ARDS, whereas the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score was higher in COVID-19-ARDS. The proportion of patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation and liver injury in COVID-19-ARDS and H7N9-ARDS was 45.5% versus 3.1% and 28.8% versus 50%, respectively (P <0.05). The mean interval from illness onset to death was shorter in H7N9-ARDS. A total of 59.1% patients with H7N9-ARDS died of refractory hypoxemia compared with 28.9% with COVID-19-ARDS (P = 0.014). Patients with COVID-19-ARDS were more likely to die of septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction compared with H7N9-ARDS (71.2% vs 36.4%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Patients with H7N9 were more susceptible to develop severe ARDS and showed a more acute disease course. COVID-19-ARDS was associated with severe inflammatory response and coagulation dysfunction, whereas liver injury was more common in H7N9-ARDS. The main causes of death between patients with the two diseases were different.

摘要

目的

比较 COVID-19 和 H7N9 病毒感染所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的临床特征。

方法

回顾性分析 100 例 COVID-19 患者和 46 例 H7N9 患者的临床资料。

结果

COVID-19-ARDS 组炎症指标升高和凝血功能障碍更为常见。H7N9-ARDS 组从发病到 ARDS 发展的中位间隔时间更短。H7N9-ARDS 组 PaO/FiO 水平较低,而 COVID-19-ARDS 组脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估评分较高。COVID-19-ARDS 和 H7N9-ARDS 中弥散性血管内凝血和肝损伤的患者比例分别为 45.5%比 3.1%和 28.8%比 50%(P<0.05)。H7N9-ARDS 组从发病到死亡的平均间隔时间较短。H7N9-ARDS 组共有 59.1%的患者因难治性低氧血症死亡,而 COVID-19-ARDS 组为 28.9%(P=0.014)。COVID-19-ARDS 患者较 H7N9-ARDS 更易死于感染性休克和多器官功能障碍(71.2%比 36.4%,P=0.005)。

结论

H7N9 患者更易发生严重 ARDS,且病情更急。COVID-19-ARDS 与严重炎症反应和凝血功能障碍有关,而 H7N9-ARDS 更常见肝损伤。两种疾病患者的主要死亡原因不同。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Increased Morbidity and Mortality in COVID-19 Patients with Liver Injury.COVID-19 患者肝损伤的发病率和死亡率增加。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jun;67(6):2577-2583. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07007-0. Epub 2021 May 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验