• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的病理淋巴结阳性前列腺癌男性患者的抗雄激素治疗应用:术后前列腺特异性抗原动力学的重要性。

Optimizing anti-androgen treatment use among men with pathologic lymph-node positive prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: the importance of postoperative PSA kinetics.

作者信息

Sood Akshay, Zhang Lawrence T, Keeley Jacob, Butaney Mohit, Stricker Maxwell, Andrews Jack R, Grauer Ralph, Peabody James O, Rogers Craig G, Menon Mani, Abdollah Firas

机构信息

VCORE-Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):58-64. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00572-z. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1038/s41391-022-00572-z
PMID:35794359
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal postsurgical management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with nodal metastasis at the time of radical prostatectomy remains unclear. We sought to examine the role of postoperative PSA kinetics and pathologic tumor characteristics in guiding additional hormonal therapy use in pN1 men.

METHODS

In total, 297 pN1 PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy and ePLND between 2002 and 2018 were identified within our prospectively maintained institutional cancer data-registry. Following surgery, these patients were managed with either immediate androgen deprivation therapy (iADT) or observation with deferred ADT (dADT). The former was defined as ADT given within ≤6 months of surgery and the latter as >6 months. The primary outcome was metastasis. Regression-tree analysis was used to stratify patients into novel risk-groups based on post-prostatectomy tumor characteristics and PSA kinetics and the corresponding metastasis risk. Multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the impact of iADT versus observation ± dADT on metastasis, cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality within each risk-group separately.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 6.1 years (IQR 3.2-9.0). Regression-tree analysis stratified patients into 3 novel risk-groups (Harrell's C-index 0.79) based on PSA-nadir and time to biochemical failure: group 1 (low-risk) included patients with time to biochemical recurrence >6 months (n = 115), while groups 2 and 3 included patients with biochemical failure within ≤6 months with a postoperative PSA-nadir <1.05 ng/mL (group 2 [intermediate-risk], n = 125) or ≥1.05 ng/mL (group 3 [high-risk], n = 57), respectively. No other patient or tumor characteristics were significant for risk stratification. Within each risk-group, the 10-year metastasis-free survival rates with iADT versus observation ± dADT use were: group 1, 100% versus 95.4% (Log-rank p = 0.738), group 2, 80.6% versus 53.5% (Log-rank p = 0.016), and group 3, 41.5% versus 0% (Log-rank p = 0.015), respectively. Adjusted Cox regression analyses confirmed the benefit of iADT utilization in reducing metastasis in group 2 (p = 0.029) and group 3 (p = 0.008) patients, with no benefit for group 1 patients (p = 0.918). Similar results were noted for cancer-specific and overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Following radical prostatectomy, early postoperative PSA kinetics may provide valuable information for guiding the timing of ADT initiation-this may reduce over- and undertreatment of pN1 PCa men.

摘要

背景

前列腺癌(PCa)患者在根治性前列腺切除术时伴有淋巴结转移,术后的最佳管理方案仍不明确。我们试图研究术后前列腺特异抗原(PSA)动力学和病理肿瘤特征在指导pN1男性患者使用额外激素治疗中的作用。

方法

在我们前瞻性维护的机构癌症数据登记处中,识别出2002年至2018年间接受根治性前列腺切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)的297例pN1 PCa患者。术后,这些患者接受即刻雄激素剥夺治疗(iADT)或观察并延迟雄激素剥夺治疗(dADT)。前者定义为在术后≤6个月内给予ADT,后者定义为>6个月。主要结局是转移。采用回归树分析,根据前列腺切除术后肿瘤特征和PSA动力学以及相应的转移风险,将患者分层为新的风险组。多变量Cox回归分析分别测试了iADT与观察±dADT对各风险组内转移、癌症特异性死亡率和总死亡率的影响。

结果

中位随访时间为6.1年(四分位间距3.2 - 9.0年)。回归树分析根据PSA最低点和生化复发时间将患者分层为3个新的风险组(Harrell's C指数为0.79):第1组(低风险)包括生化复发时间>6个月的患者(n = 115),而第2组和第3组分别包括生化复发时间≤6个月且术后PSA最低点<1.05 ng/mL(第2组[中风险],n = 125)或≥1.05 ng/mL(第3组[高风险],n = 57)的患者。没有其他患者或肿瘤特征对风险分层有显著意义。在每个风险组中,使用iADT与观察±dADT的10年无转移生存率分别为:第1组,100%对95.4%(对数秩检验p = 0.738),第2组,80.6%对53.5%(对数秩检验p = 0.016),第3组,41.5%对0%(对数秩检验p = 0.015)。调整后的Cox回归分析证实,iADT用于降低第2组(p = 0.029)和第3组(p = 0.008)患者转移的益处,而对第1组患者无益处(p = 0.918)。癌症特异性死亡率和总死亡率也有类似结果。

结论

根治性前列腺切除术后,早期术后PSA动力学可为指导ADT开始时机提供有价值的信息,这可能减少pN1 PCa男性患者的过度治疗和治疗不足。

相似文献

1
Optimizing anti-androgen treatment use among men with pathologic lymph-node positive prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: the importance of postoperative PSA kinetics.优化接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的病理淋巴结阳性前列腺癌男性患者的抗雄激素治疗应用:术后前列腺特异性抗原动力学的重要性。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):58-64. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00572-z. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
2
The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原持续存在对预测淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者临床进展和癌症特异性死亡率的作用。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
3
Ultra-early versus early salvage androgen deprivation therapy for post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence in pT2-4N0M0 prostate cancer.pT2-4N0M0前列腺癌前列腺切除术后生化复发的超早期与早期挽救性雄激素剥夺治疗
BMC Urol. 2014 Oct 16;14:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-81.
4
Use of Concomitant Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients Treated with Early Salvage Radiotherapy for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Long-term Results from a Large, Multi-institutional Series.早期挽救性放疗后生化复发的前列腺癌患者应用同期雄激素剥夺治疗:一项大型多机构系列研究的长期结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.020. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
5
Optimal PSA Threshold for Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer following Radical Prostatectomy and Adjuvant Radiation Therapy.根治性前列腺切除术和辅助放疗后前列腺癌患者接受雄激素剥夺治疗的最佳 PSA 阈值。
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Aug;61(8):652-659. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.8.652.
6
Definition and Impact on Oncologic Outcomes of Persistently Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen After Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Node-only Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Implications for Multimodal Therapy.根治性前列腺切除术后淋巴结复发的前列腺特异性抗原持续升高对肿瘤学结果的定义和影响:多模态治疗的临床意义。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Jun;5(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
7
Impact of Early Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.早期挽救性雄激素剥夺疗法对前列腺癌根治术后局限性前列腺癌的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Jul;59(5):580-587. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.5.580.
8
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.EAU 前列腺癌指南。第二部分:晚期、复发性和去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):467-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Not as Good as Previously Thought.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌淋巴结复发行挽救性淋巴结清扫术的长期疗效:并不如先前认为的那样好。
Eur Urol. 2020 Nov;78(5):661-669. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.043. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
10
Integrating Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics into Contemporary Predictive Nomograms of Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy.将前列腺特异性抗原动力学纳入根治性前列腺切除术后挽救性放疗的当代预测nomogram 中。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Jun;5(3):304-313. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel, alternative splicing signature to detect lymph node metastasis in prostate adenocarcinoma with machine learning.利用机器学习检测前列腺腺癌淋巴结转移的新型可变剪接特征
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 13;12:1084403. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1084403. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy for Men at High Risk for Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Death.辅助治疗与早期挽救性放疗在前列腺癌根治术后高复发风险男性中的应用及其与死亡风险的关系。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 10;39(20):2284-2293. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03714. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
2
Intermediate clinical endpoints for surrogacy in localised prostate cancer: an aggregate meta-analysis.局部前列腺癌中替代终点的临床中期结果:汇总荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):402-410. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30730-0.
3
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2020 版更新。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
4
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2020 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG 前列腺癌诊治指南。第二部分-2020 年更新:复发性和转移性前列腺癌的治疗。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):263-282. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.046. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Cohort Studies: Design, Analysis, and Reporting.队列研究:设计、分析和报告。
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1S):S72-S78. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.014.
6
Imaging Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy: Where Are We Headed?前列腺切除术(根治性前列腺切除术)后影像学生化复发:我们的方向在哪里?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jun;214(6):1248-1258. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21905. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Risk of dementia following androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of prostate cancer.雄激素剥夺疗法治疗前列腺癌后痴呆的风险。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Sep;23(3):410-418. doi: 10.1038/s41391-019-0189-3. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Evolution of definitive external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.前列腺癌根治性外照射放疗的演变。
World J Urol. 2020 Mar;38(3):565-591. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02661-6. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
Ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level as a predictor of biochemical progression after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Towards risk adapted follow-up.超敏前列腺特异性抗原水平作为机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化进展的预测指标:迈向风险适应性随访。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Feb;33(2):e22693. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22693. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
10
Genomic Heterogeneity Within Individual Prostate Cancer Foci Impacts Predictive Biomarkers of Targeted Therapy.个体前列腺癌病灶内的基因组异质性影响靶向治疗的预测性生物标志物。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 May;5(3):416-424. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 15.