School of Public Policy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Microsoft Research, New York City, NY, USA.
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2618-2620. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01909-1. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
This erratum reports on a technical error that was discovered in Study 2 of Peer et al. (2021). Because of this technical error, some specific findings on participants' proclivity for dishonesty reported in the paper have been found incorrect. We detail the error, which only affected female participants, and its impact on the findings and report on the reanalyzed findings accounting for the error. The new findings do not change the conclusions provided in the paper, and show again that participants from MTurk are more likely to engage in dishonest behavior than participants from Prolific or CloudResearch.
本勘误报告涉及 Peer 等人的研究 2 中的一个技术错误（2021）。由于这个技术错误，论文中关于参与者不诚实倾向的一些具体发现被发现是不正确的。我们详细说明了这个只影响女性参与者的错误及其对研究结果的影响，并报告了考虑到该错误的重新分析结果。新的发现并没有改变论文中提供的结论，再次表明来自 MTurk 的参与者比来自 Prolific 或 CloudResearch 的参与者更有可能从事不诚实行为。
