Suppr超能文献

两个基于网络的调查平台在人口统计学和行为方面的差异:对加热烟草制品(HTP)风险认知研究的观察结果

Differences in demographics and behaviors across two web-based survey platforms: Observations from a study of risk perceptions of heated tobacco products (HTPs).

作者信息

Sharma Akshika, Fix Brian, Hyland Andrew, Quisenberry Amanda J, Bansal-Travers Maansi, O'Connor Richard J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2023 Mar 31;33:102194. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102194. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

With an escalating popularity of online surveys in behavioral research, it is critical to understand how different sources of participants can yield differing outcomes. While Mturk has been used for online surveys for almost two decades, a recent introduction of online panels allows researchers to choose participants from variety of pools. This study aims to contribute to existing knowledge of how participants from different online platforms differ in their characteristics and behavioral responses which might affect the outcomes. 300 participants were recruited each from Mturk and Prime panels for a 20 mins long survey assessing perceptions and intentions to use Heated tobacco products (HTPs). Participants answered demographic and tobacco-use related questions including their vaccination and masking for COVID-19. They were shown a picture and description of a recently launched HTP. Further, participants answered questions about their awareness of HTPs, risk perception of health conditions from use of different tobacco products (cigarettes, e-cigarettes and HTPs) and perceived severity of COVID-19 infection in smokers, vapers and HTP users. Results showed significant differences in Mturk and Prime panel participants' demographics and tobacco-use. Prime panels showed more racially diverse population (chi-sq = 10.07, p < 0.02) and significantly more current smokers (chi-sq = 44.74, p < 0.01) and current e-cigarette users (chi-sq = 38.04, p < 0.01) compared with Mturk. Mean perception scores for COVID risk in tobacco users were significantly different between Prime panels and Mturk. Study highlights significant differences in sample composition and responses that might be helpful in choosing one online platform over another based on specific study requirements.

摘要

随着在线调查在行为研究中的日益普及,了解不同的参与者来源如何产生不同的结果至关重要。虽然亚马逊土耳其机器人(Mturk)已用于在线调查近二十年,但最近引入的在线样本库使研究人员能够从各种群体中选择参与者。本研究旨在为现有知识做出贡献,即来自不同在线平台的参与者在其特征和行为反应方面存在哪些差异,而这些差异可能会影响研究结果。分别从Mturk和Prime样本库招募了300名参与者,进行一项长达20分钟的调查,评估对加热烟草制品(HTP)的认知和使用意图。参与者回答了人口统计学和与烟草使用相关的问题,包括他们的新冠疫苗接种情况和新冠病毒防护口罩佩戴情况。他们观看了一张最近推出的加热烟草制品的图片和相关描述。此外,参与者回答了关于他们对加热烟草制品的认知、使用不同烟草制品(香烟、电子烟和加热烟草制品)对健康状况的风险认知以及吸烟者、电子烟使用者和加热烟草制品使用者感染新冠病毒的感知严重程度等问题。结果显示,Mturk和Prime样本库参与者在人口统计学和烟草使用方面存在显著差异。Prime样本库的人群种族更加多样化(卡方 = 10.07,p < 0.02),与Mturk相比,当前吸烟者(卡方 = 44.74,p < 0.01)和当前电子烟使用者(卡方 = 38.04,p < 0.01)明显更多。Prime样本库和Mturk之间,烟草使用者对新冠风险的平均认知得分存在显著差异。研究强调了样本构成和反应方面的显著差异,这可能有助于根据特定研究要求在不同的在线平台之间进行选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ec/10201846/cdffb8c363a7/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验