Lanssens Dorien, Goemaes Régine, Vrielinck Christine, Tency Inge
Scientific Research Working Group, Flemish Professional Organization of Midwives, Antwerp, Belgium.
Limburg Clinical Research Centre Mobile Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Jun 10;6:36. doi: 10.18332/ejm/147478. eCollection 2022.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) leads to improved health outcomes and reduces variability in the quality of care. However, literature on the knowledge, attitudes and use of EBP among midwives is scarce internationally and in Belgium.
A cross-sectional study using an online semi-structured questionnaire explored practice, attitudes and barriers on EBP and clinical practice guidelines. Midwives (n=251) working in university and non-university hospitals, primary care, and midwifery education, in Flanders (Belgium) were included.
Midwives with a Master's degree (57.7% vs 37.8%; p=0.004), ≤15 years since graduation (50.8% vs 35.5%; p=0.015) and aged <40 years (49.7% vs 34.6%; p=0.02), had better knowledge of the EBP-definition. The majority searched for literature (80.1%), mainly evidence-based (EB) clinical practice guidelines (50.6%), randomized controlled trials (45.0%) and systematic reviews (43.0%). Midwives found EBP necessary and realistic to apply in daily practice and support decision-making. They were willing to improve EBP-knowledge and skills but assumed to be competent in providing evidence-based care. Most respondents were convinced of the importance of EB clinical practice guidelines but did not believe guidelines facilitated their practices or enabled them to consider patient preferences adequately. Half of the midwives (55.8%) experienced barriers to EB clinical practice guideline use, mainly lack of time (35.9%), access (19.5%), and support (17.9%).
Although midwives showed a positive attitude towards EBP, education programs to promote EBP and improve EBP-related knowledge and skills are needed. Future efforts should focus on developing strategies for overcoming barriers and enhancing the consistency of EBP implementation.
循证实践(EBP)可改善健康结局并减少护理质量的差异。然而,国际上以及比利时关于助产士对循证实践的知识、态度及应用的文献较少。
采用在线半结构化问卷进行横断面研究,探讨循证实践和临床实践指南的应用、态度及障碍。纳入了比利时弗拉芒地区在大学医院和非大学医院、初级保健机构以及助产教育机构工作的251名助产士。
拥有硕士学位的助产士(57.7%对37.8%;p = 0.004)、毕业≤15年的助产士(50.8%对35.5%;p = 0.015)以及年龄<40岁的助产士(49.7%对34.6%;p = 0.02)对循证实践定义的了解更好。大多数人会搜索文献(80.1%),主要是循证(EB)临床实践指南(50.6%)、随机对照试验(45.0%)和系统评价(43.0%)。助产士认为循证实践在日常实践中是必要且切实可行的,有助于决策。他们愿意提高循证实践的知识和技能,但认为自己有能力提供循证护理。大多数受访者确信循证临床实践指南的重要性,但不认为指南有助于他们的实践或使他们能够充分考虑患者偏好。一半的助产士(55.8%)在使用循证临床实践指南时遇到障碍,主要是时间不足(35.9%)、获取途径(19.5%)和支持不足(17.9%)。
尽管助产士对循证实践持积极态度,但仍需要开展教育项目以促进循证实践并提高与循证实践相关的知识和技能。未来的努力应集中在制定克服障碍的策略以及增强循证实践实施的一致性。