• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将非药物性疼痛管理作为分娩女性的初始选择所面临的障碍:文献综述

The barriers to offering non-pharmacological pain management as an initial option for laboring women: A review of the literature.

作者信息

Ingram Matilda A, Brady Susannah, Peacock Ann S

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Jun 10;6:37. doi: 10.18332/ejm/149244. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.18332/ejm/149244
PMID:35794877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9186088/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many women use pharmacological or non-pharmacological pain management (NPPM) during childbirth, however, evidence shows the usage rates of pharmacological pain management are increasing. The shift towards a biomedical approach to birth care opposes the enduring midwifery philosophy of trusting the woman and her body. Identifying midwives' beliefs and attitudes towards perceived and actual barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option will provide insight into the factors that affect this.

METHODS

This review of the literature sought to understand midwives' beliefs and attitudes towards the barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option for laboring women. Peer-reviewed journals were searched for primary research that met the inclusion criteria and explored midwives' beliefs and attitudes towards the barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option for laboring women. Included studies were evaluated for quality according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists.

RESULTS

Thirteen qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria and four main themes of barriers to midwives offering NPPM emerged: health system-related, health facility-related, health practitioner-related, and health consumer-related barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

The review of the literature highlighted there are barriers that prevent or delay the initial utilization of non-pharmacological methods of pain management in labor by midwives. These findings can be used as a platform to inform further research into this topic.

摘要

引言

许多女性在分娩期间会使用药物性或非药物性疼痛管理(NPPM),然而,有证据表明药物性疼痛管理的使用率正在上升。向生物医学分娩护理方法的转变与助产士信任女性及其身体的长期理念相悖。确定助产士对将NPPM作为初始选择的感知和实际障碍的信念和态度,将有助于深入了解影响这一情况的因素。

方法

本文献综述旨在了解助产士对将NPPM作为分娩女性初始选择的障碍的信念和态度。在同行评审期刊中搜索符合纳入标准的原始研究,这些研究探讨了助产士对将NPPM作为分娩女性初始选择的障碍的信念和态度。根据批判性评估技能计划(CASP)清单对纳入研究的质量进行评估。

结果

13项定性研究符合纳入标准,出现了助产士提供NPPM的四个主要障碍主题:与卫生系统相关、与医疗机构相关、与卫生从业者相关以及与卫生消费者相关的障碍。

结论

文献综述强调存在一些障碍,阻碍或延迟了助产士在分娩中最初使用非药物性疼痛管理方法。这些发现可作为进一步研究该主题的平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fc/9186088/47a2935ee3f7/EJM-6-37-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fc/9186088/6a3e32587f06/EJM-6-37-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fc/9186088/f7a386659f58/EJM-6-37-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fc/9186088/47a2935ee3f7/EJM-6-37-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fc/9186088/6a3e32587f06/EJM-6-37-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fc/9186088/f7a386659f58/EJM-6-37-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fc/9186088/47a2935ee3f7/EJM-6-37-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The barriers to offering non-pharmacological pain management as an initial option for laboring women: A review of the literature.将非药物性疼痛管理作为分娩女性的初始选择所面临的障碍:文献综述
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Jun 10;6:37. doi: 10.18332/ejm/149244. eCollection 2022.
2
Healthcare Providers' Utilization of Nonpharmacological Methods in Managing Labor Pain: An Integrative Review.医疗服务提供者在管理分娩疼痛中对非药物方法的应用:一项综合综述。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Oct;25(5):480-486. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.010. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
3
Epidurals during normal labour and birth - Midwives' attitudes and experiences.正常分娩时的硬膜外麻醉——助产士的态度和经验。
Women Birth. 2021 Jul;34(4):e384-e389. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
4
A meta-ethnographic synthesis of midwives' and nurses' experiences of adverse labour and birth events.助产士和护士对不良分娩事件体验的元人种志综合研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4184-4200. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13965. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
5
The lived experiences of midwifery care for women with diabetes: An integrative review.糖尿病女性助产护理的体验:综合评价。
Midwifery. 2020 Oct;89:102795. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102795. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Midwives and women's experiences of Sterile Water Injections for back pain during labour: An integrative review.导乐和产妇在分娩时使用无菌水注射治疗背痛的体验:综合评价。
Midwifery. 2021 Dec;103:103164. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103164. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
7
Midwives' experiences of referring obese women to either a community or home-based antenatal weight management service: Implications for service providers and midwifery practice.助产士将肥胖女性转介至社区或居家产前体重管理服务的经历:对服务提供者和助产实践的启示
Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
8
"It's what midwifery is all about": Western Australian midwives' experiences of being 'with woman' during labour and birth in the known midwife model.“这就是产科学的全部内容”:在已知的助产士模式下,西澳大利亚助产士在分娩过程中“陪伴妇女”的体验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2144-z.
9
Nurses and midwives' experiences of using non-pharmacological interventions for labour pain management: a qualitative study in Ghana.护士和助产士在分娩疼痛管理中使用非药物干预措施的体验:加纳的一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 May 14;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2311-x.
10
Experiences and perceptions of Ghanaian midwives on labour pain and religious beliefs and practices influencing their care of women in labour.加纳助产士对分娩疼痛以及影响其对分娩妇女护理的宗教信仰和习俗的经历与看法。
Reprod Health. 2016 Nov 14;13(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0252-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Acupoint Stimulation Combined With Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Labor Pain: Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.穴位刺激联合经皮电神经刺激对分娩疼痛的影响:一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 26;14:e63050. doi: 10.2196/63050.
2
Utilization of nonpharmacological labor pain management and associated factors among healthcare providers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚医疗服务提供者中非药物性分娩疼痛管理的应用及相关因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07417-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions for fear of childbirth including tocophobia.分娩恐惧干预措施,包括恐产症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 7;7(7):CD013321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013321.pub2.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Childbirth Preparation: Knowledge of the Use of Non-Pharmacological Pain Relief Methods during Childbirth in Tshwane District, South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.
分娩准备:南非茨瓦内地区分娩期间非药物性疼痛缓解方法使用情况的知识:一项横断面研究
Nurs Rep. 2023 Dec 21;14(1):1-11. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14010001.
4
Non-Pharmacological Pain Management in Labor: A Systematic Review.分娩期非药物性疼痛管理:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):7203. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237203.
5
Women's Knowledge about Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Methods of Pain Relief in Labor.女性对分娩时疼痛缓解的药理学和非药理学方法的了解。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;11(13):1882. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131882.
6
The Role of Midwives in the Course of Natural Childbirth-Analysis of Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Factors-A Cross-Sectional Study.导乐在自然分娩过程中的作用——社会人口学和心理社会因素分析——一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15824. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315824.
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
4
Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review.女性在分娩过程中使用药物和非药物缓解疼痛方法的体验:一项定性系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2019 May 30;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0735-4.
5
Nurses and midwives' experiences of using non-pharmacological interventions for labour pain management: a qualitative study in Ghana.护士和助产士在分娩疼痛管理中使用非药物干预措施的体验:加纳的一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 May 14;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2311-x.
6
"It's what midwifery is all about": Western Australian midwives' experiences of being 'with woman' during labour and birth in the known midwife model.“这就是产科学的全部内容”:在已知的助产士模式下,西澳大利亚助产士在分娩过程中“陪伴妇女”的体验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2144-z.
7
Inclusion and exclusion criteria and the problem of describing homogeneity of study populations in clinical trials.临床试验中的纳入和排除标准以及描述研究人群同质性的问题。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Jun;24(3):92-94. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111115. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
8
Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Methods of Labour Pain Relief-Establishment of Effectiveness and Comparison.分娩镇痛的药理学和非药理学方法——有效性的确立与比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 9;15(12):2792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122792.
9
Effects of the birthing room environment on vaginal births and client-centred outcomes for women at term planning a vaginal birth: BE-UP, a multicentre randomised controlled trial.分娩室环境对足月计划阴道分娩的女性阴道分娩及以产妇为中心的结局的影响:BE-UP,一项多中心随机对照试验
Trials. 2018 Nov 19;19(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2979-7.
10
"We know it's labour pain, so we don't do anything": healthcare provider's knowledge and attitudes regarding the provision of pain relief during labour and after childbirth.“我们知道这是分娩痛,所以我们什么也不做”:医疗保健提供者对分娩中和分娩后提供止痛的知识和态度。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 14;18(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2076-7.