• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查和诊断试验的性能。接受者操作特征分析的应用。

Performance of screening and diagnostic tests. Application of receiver operating characteristic analysis.

作者信息

Murphy J M, Berwick D M, Weinstein M C, Borus J F, Budman S H, Klerman G L

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;44(6):550-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180068011.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180068011
PMID:3579501
Abstract

Evaluation of psychiatric screening and diagnostic tests has benefited from the application of sensitivity, specificity, the kappa-statistic, and predictive values. These measures derive their meaning from a single criterion threshold. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis extends assessment of test performance by providing information about all possible pairs of achievable sensitivity and specificity values. The ROC analysis offers a comprehensive means for comparing different tests or different scoring procedures for one test. As a demonstration we used the ROC analysis to evaluate three types of scoring rules for one psychiatric test, the Health Opinion Survey. The demonstration indicated that ROC analysis can profitably take a place among the standard methods for test evaluation in psychiatric research. In addition, ROC analysis can assist clinicians in selecting appropriate test procedures for particular patient populations.

摘要

精神病学筛查和诊断测试的评估受益于敏感性、特异性、kappa统计量和预测值的应用。这些指标从单一标准阈值中得出其意义。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析通过提供关于所有可能的可实现敏感性和特异性值对的信息,扩展了测试性能的评估。ROC分析为比较不同测试或同一测试的不同评分程序提供了一种全面的方法。作为一个示例,我们使用ROC分析来评估一项精神病学测试——健康意见调查的三种评分规则。该示例表明,ROC分析在精神病学研究的测试评估标准方法中可以发挥有益作用。此外,ROC分析可以帮助临床医生为特定患者群体选择合适的测试程序。

相似文献

1
Performance of screening and diagnostic tests. Application of receiver operating characteristic analysis.筛查和诊断试验的性能。接受者操作特征分析的应用。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;44(6):550-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180068011.
2
Diagnostic efficiency and hierarchical functioning of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版边缘型人格障碍标准的诊断效率及层级功能
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1999 Mar;187(3):167-73. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199903000-00006.
3
Reliability of criteria for borderline personality disorder: a comparison of DSM-III and the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients.边缘型人格障碍诊断标准的可靠性:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版与边缘型患者诊断访谈的比较
Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Sep;141(9):1080-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.9.1080.
4
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) accuracy for anxiety disorders detection in drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy patients.医院焦虑和抑郁量表-焦虑分量表(HADS-A)和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)在耐药性内侧颞叶癫痫患者焦虑障碍检测中的准确性。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:452-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.072. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
5
Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder.
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Oct;145(10):1280-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.10.1280.
6
Severity as a diagnostic dimension of borderline personality disorder.严重程度作为边缘性人格障碍的一个诊断维度。
Can J Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;39(9):540-4. doi: 10.1177/070674379403900905.
7
[Cross-validation of three questionnaires for structural diagnosis: BPI, IPO, and OPD-SQ].[用于结构诊断的三份问卷的交叉验证:简明疼痛问卷(BPI)、国际功能、残疾和健康分类问卷(IPO)以及门诊患者数据收集与分析系统问卷(OPD-SQ)]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2016;62(2):177-89. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2016.62.2.177.
8
A comparison of the validity of two psychiatric screening questionnaires (GHQ-12 and SRQ-20) in Brazil, using Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis.运用相对操作特征(ROC)分析对巴西两种精神科筛查问卷(GHQ - 12和SRQ - 20)的有效性进行比较。
Psychol Med. 1985 Aug;15(3):651-9. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700031500.
9
A comparison of four measures to diagnose DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder in outpatients.门诊患者中用于诊断《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)边缘型人格障碍的四种测量方法的比较。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991 Jun;179(6):329-37.
10
A self-report scale to help make psychiatric diagnoses: the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire.一种有助于进行精神疾病诊断的自评量表:精神疾病诊断筛查问卷。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;58(8):787-94. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.8.787.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Statistical Practices for Longitudinal Group Comparison of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale on Power and Effect Size Estimation: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.用于纵向组间吞咽困难评估量表比较的统计方法对检验效能和效应量估计的影响:一项蒙特卡洛模拟研究
Dysphagia. 2025 Apr;40(2):388-398. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10738-7. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
2
Comparison of three frailty scales for prediction of prolonged postoperative ileus following major abdominal surgery in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study.三种衰弱量表预测老年患者大腹部手术后长时间术后肠梗阻的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Apr 16;24(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02391-6.
3
Self-reported distress and problems after treatment for gynecological cancer - Correlation between a short screening tool and longer measures of anxiety/depression and health-related quality of life.
妇科癌症治疗后自我报告的痛苦和问题 - 简短筛查工具与焦虑/抑郁和健康相关生活质量的更长测量指标之间的相关性。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Feb;103(2):387-395. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14709. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
4
Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for Suicide Screening in Transgender Women.用于跨性别女性自杀筛查的患者健康问卷-9的验证
Transgend Health. 2023 Oct 4;8(5):450-456. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2021.0075. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Comparable Minimally Important Differences and Responsiveness of Brief Pain Inventory and PEG Pain Scales across 6 Trials.6项试验中简明疼痛量表和PEG疼痛量表的可比最小重要差异及反应性
J Pain. 2024 Jan;25(1):142-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.028. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
6
Loaded and unloaded timed stair tests as tools for assessing advanced functional mobility in people with stroke.将计时楼梯测试作为评估脑卒中患者高级功能性移动能力的工具进行加载和卸载。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb;59(1):14-24. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07620-7. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
Development and Validation of the Chinese Frailty Screening Scale: A Study among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Shanghai.中文虚弱筛查量表的制定与验证:以上海市社区老年人为研究对象。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;19(18):11811. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811811.
8
Can Cognitive Flexibility and Clinical Perfectionism Be Used to Identify People with Anorexia Nervosa?认知灵活性和临床完美主义能否用于识别神经性厌食症患者?
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 31;11(7):1954. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071954.
9
Newborn Auditory Brainstem Responses in Children with Developmental Disabilities.发育障碍儿童的新生儿听觉脑干反应
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Feb;53(2):776-788. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05126-1. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
10
Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) for identifying insomnia in young adult cancer survivors: comparison with a structured clinical diagnostic interview of the DSM-5 (SCID-5).用于识别年轻成年癌症幸存者失眠情况的失眠严重程度指数(ISI)的验证:与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)的结构化临床诊断访谈(SCID-5)的比较
Sleep Med. 2021 May;81:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.01.045. Epub 2021 Feb 4.