• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的长期生存比较:一项跨国队列研究。

Long-term Survival After Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Gastric Bypass in a Binational Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2022 Sep 1;45(9):1981-1986. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0485.

DOI:10.2337/dc22-0485
PMID:35796573
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bariatric surgery prolongs life expectancy in severely obese individuals, but it is uncertain which of the two dominating bariatric procedures, sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass, offers the best long-term survival.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a population-based cohort study of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared with gastric bypass for obesity in Sweden and Finland between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2020. The risk of all-cause mortality was calculated using multivariable Cox regression, providing hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, Charlson comorbidity index, country, and calendar year.

RESULTS

Among 61,503 patients (median age 42 years; 75.4% women), who contributed 415,712 person-years at risk (mean 6.8 person-years), 1,571 (2.6%) died during follow-up. Compared with patients who underwent gastric bypass (n = 51,891 [84.4%]), the sleeve gastrectomy group (n = 9,612 [15.6%]) had similar all-cause mortality during the entire study period (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.20), but decreased all-cause mortality in more recent years (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.97, from 2014 onward). Diabetes interacted statistically significantly with the type of bariatric surgery, with higher all-cause mortality after sleeve gastrectomy than after gastric bypass (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.06-2.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival following sleeve gastrectomy seems to compare well with gastric bypass and may even be better during recent years. A tailored surgical approach in relation to patients' diabetes status may optimize survival in patients selected for bariatric surgery (i.e., sleeve gastrectomy for patients without diabetes and gastric bypass for patients with diabetes).

摘要

目的

减重手术可延长重度肥胖患者的预期寿命,但目前尚不确定两种主要的减重手术(胃袖状切除术和胃旁路术)中哪一种提供最佳的长期生存。

研究设计和方法

这是一项基于人群的队列研究,比较了瑞典和芬兰在 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间进行的腹腔镜下胃袖状切除术与胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的效果。使用多变量 Cox 回归计算全因死亡率,提供经过年龄、性别、高血压、糖尿病、Charlson 合并症指数、国家和日历年调整的危险比(HR)及其 95%置信区间。

结果

在 61503 例患者(中位年龄 42 岁,75.4%为女性)中,共随访 415712 人年(平均随访 6.8 人年),随访期间有 1571 例(2.6%)死亡。与接受胃旁路术的患者(n=51891[84.4%])相比,接受胃袖状切除术的患者(n=9612[15.6%])在整个研究期间全因死亡率相似(HR 0.98,95%CI 0.81-1.20),但在最近几年全因死亡率降低(HR 0.72,95%CI 0.54-0.97,自 2014 年起)。糖尿病与减重手术的类型存在统计学显著交互作用,胃袖状切除术的全因死亡率高于胃旁路术(HR 1.54,95%CI 1.06-2.24)。

结论

胃袖状切除术的总体生存率似乎与胃旁路术相当,在最近几年甚至可能更好。根据患者糖尿病状况制定个体化手术方法可能会优化接受减重手术患者的生存(即无糖尿病患者行胃袖状切除术,有糖尿病患者行胃旁路术)。

相似文献

1
Long-term Survival After Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Gastric Bypass in a Binational Cohort Study.胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的长期生存比较:一项跨国队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Sep 1;45(9):1981-1986. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0485.
2
Association of Bariatric Surgery Using Laparoscopic Banding, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Usual Care Obesity Management With All-Cause Mortality.采用腹腔镜束带术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的减重手术与常规肥胖管理对全因死亡率的影响。
JAMA. 2018 Jan 16;319(3):279-290. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20513.
3
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
4
Comparative Safety of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass Up to 5 Years After Surgery in Patients With Severe Obesity.肥胖症患者行袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术 5 年后的安全性比较。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1160-1169. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4981.
5
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients Older than 60.60岁以上患者行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的疗效
Obes Surg. 2015 Dec;25(12):2251-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1712-9.
6
Medication Use for Obesity-Related Comorbidities After Sleeve Gastrectomy or Gastric Bypass.袖状胃切除术或胃旁路术后肥胖相关合并症的药物治疗。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Mar 1;157(3):248-256. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6898.
7
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy achieve comparable weight loss at 1 year.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术在1年内实现的体重减轻效果相当。
Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1325-8.
8
Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对病态肥胖患者体重减轻的影响:SM-BOSS随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Jan 16;319(3):255-265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20897.
9
Long-term adverse events after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass: a 7-year nationwide, observational, population-based, cohort study.袖状胃切除术或胃旁路术后的长期不良事件:一项为期 7 年的全国性、观察性、基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Oct;7(10):786-795. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30191-3. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
10
Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效比较:基于 18 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Gastric Bypass vs Sleeve Gastrectomy.胃旁路手术与袖状胃切除术后的主要不良心脏事件
JAMA Surg. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1065.
2
Bariatric Surgery and Risk of End-Stage Liver Disease in a Four-Country Cohort Study.一项四国队列研究中的减肥手术与终末期肝病风险
Obes Surg. 2025 May;35(5):1845-1853. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07857-x. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
3
Long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality for four bariatric surgery procedures.四种减重手术程序的长期全因和特定原因死亡率。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 Feb;31(2):574-585. doi: 10.1002/oby.23646.