Broeker Laura, Brüning Jovita, Fandakova Yana, Khosravani Neda, Kiesel Andrea, Kubik Veit, Kübler Sebastian, Manzey Dietrich, Monno Irina, Raab Markus, Schubert Torsten
Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne.
Department of Psychology and Ergonomics, Technical University Berlin.
Psychol Rev. 2022 Nov;129(6):1486-1494. doi: 10.1037/rev0000376. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
It has been recently suggested that research on human multitasking is best organized according to three research perspectives, which differ in their focus on cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity. Even though it is argued that the perspectives should be seen as complementary, there has not been a formal approach describing or explaining the intersections between the three perspectives. With this theoretical note, we would like to show that the explicit consideration of individual differences is one possible way to elaborate in more detail on how and why the perspectives complement each other. We will define structure, flexibility, and plasticity; describe what constitutes individual differences; will outline selected empirical examples; and raise possible future research questions helping to develop the research field. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
最近有人提出,对人类多任务处理的研究最好按照三种研究视角来组织,这三种视角在对认知结构、灵活性和可塑性的关注上有所不同。尽管有人认为这些视角应被视为互补的,但尚未有一种正式的方法来描述或解释这三种视角之间的交叉点。基于这一理论说明,我们想表明,明确考虑个体差异是一种可能的方式,可以更详细地阐述这些视角如何以及为何相互补充。我们将定义结构、灵活性和可塑性;描述个体差异的构成要素;概述选定的实证例子;并提出可能有助于该研究领域发展的未来研究问题。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)