• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压护理和治疗依从性的意见:荷兰海牙的一项定性研究。

Opinions on hypertension care and therapy adherence at the healthcare provider and healthcare system level: a qualitative study in the Hague, Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 8;12(7):e062128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062128.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062128
PMID:35803634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9272114/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Hypertension is a common cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although hypertension can be effectively controlled by blood pressure-lowering drugs, uncontrolled blood pressure is common despite use of these medications. One explanation is therapy non-adherence. Therapy non-adherence can be addressed at the individual level, the level of the healthcare provider and at the healthcare system level. Since the latter two levels are often overlooked, we wished to explore facilitators and barriers on each of these levels in relation to hypertension care for people with hypertension, with a specific focus on therapy adherence.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using focus groups of healthcare providers. Data were analysed using the theoretical domains framework (TDF) and the behaviour change wheel.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Participants were from a highly urbanised city environment (the Hague, Netherlands), and included nine primary care physicians, six practice nurses and five secondary care physicians involved in hypertension care.

RESULTS

Nine domains on the TDF were found to be relevant at the healthcare provider level ('knowledge', 'physical, cognitive and interpersonal skills', 'memory, attention and decision processes', 'professional, social role and identity', 'optimism', 'beliefs about consequences', 'intention', 'emotion' and 'social influences') and two domains ('resources' and 'goals') were found to be relevant at the system level. Facilitators for these domains were good interpersonal skills, paying attention to behavioural factors such as medication use, and the belief that treatment improves health outcomes. Barriers were related to time, interdisciplinary collaboration, technical and financial issues, availability of blood pressure devices and education of people with hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlighted a need for better collaboration between primary and secondary care, for more team-based care including pharmacists and social workers, tools to improve interpersonal skills and more time for patient-healthcare provider communication.

摘要

目的

高血压是心血管发病率和死亡率的一个常见原因。尽管降压药物可以有效控制高血压,但尽管使用这些药物,血压仍无法得到有效控制。其中一个解释是治疗不依从。治疗不依从可以在个人层面、医疗服务提供者层面和医疗系统层面上得到解决。由于后两个层面经常被忽视,我们希望探讨与高血压患者的高血压护理相关的每个层面上的促进因素和障碍因素,特别关注治疗依从性。

设计

使用医疗服务提供者焦点小组的定性研究。使用理论领域框架(TDF)和行为改变轮分析数据。

设置和参与者

参与者来自高度城市化的城市环境(荷兰海牙),包括九名初级保健医生、六名执业护士和五名参与高血压护理的二级保健医生。

结果

在医疗服务提供者层面,发现 TDF 的九个领域与高血压护理相关(“知识”、“身体、认知和人际技能”、“记忆、注意力和决策过程”、“专业、社会角色和身份”、“乐观”、“信念后果”、“意图”、“情绪”和“社会影响”),而两个领域(“资源”和“目标”)与系统层面相关。这些领域的促进因素是良好的人际交往能力,关注行为因素,如药物使用,以及治疗可以改善健康结果的信念。障碍与时间、跨学科合作、技术和财务问题、血压设备的可用性以及高血压患者的教育有关。

结论

这项研究强调了初级保健和二级保健之间更好的协作、更多的团队为基础的护理、包括药剂师和社会工作者的团队护理、提高人际交往能力的工具以及更多的医患沟通时间的必要性。

相似文献

1
Opinions on hypertension care and therapy adherence at the healthcare provider and healthcare system level: a qualitative study in the Hague, Netherlands.高血压护理和治疗依从性的意见:荷兰海牙的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 8;12(7):e062128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062128.
2
Community pharmacists' views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews.社区药剂师对使用筛查工具构建老年人用药审查的看法:定性访谈结果
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1086-1095. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
Improving medication dispensing and counselling for patients with vision impairment: a qualitative study of pharmacist-reported barriers and facilitators.改善视力障碍患者的药物调配与咨询服务:一项关于药剂师报告的障碍与促进因素的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11009-9.
4
Improving appropriate polypharmacy for older people in primary care: selecting components of an evidence-based intervention to target prescribing and dispensing.改善基层医疗中老年人的合理联合用药:选择基于证据的干预措施组成部分以针对处方开具和配药环节
Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 16;10:161. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0349-3.
5
'I've always done what I was told by the medical people': a qualitative study of the reasons why older adults attend multifactorial falls risk assessments mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.“我一直按照医务人员的指示行事”:一项基于理论领域框架的定性研究,旨在探讨老年人接受多因素跌倒风险评估的原因。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e033069. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033069.
6
Applying the theoretical domains framework to identify determinants to mental healthcare use among older African Americans with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.运用理论领域框架识别 2 型糖尿病老年非裔美国人心理健康保健使用的决定因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):e073689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073689.
7
What helps and hinders midwives in engaging with pregnant women about stopping smoking? A cross-sectional survey of perceived implementation difficulties among midwives in the North East of England.哪些因素有助于或阻碍助产士与孕妇就戒烟问题进行沟通?一项针对英格兰东北部助产士感知实施难点的横断面调查。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:36. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-36.
8
Barriers and facilitators to implementing the CURE stop smoking project: a qualitative study.实施 CURE 戒烟项目的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 20;21(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06504-2.
9
Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioural analysis of interventions.降低导尿管相关尿路感染:对障碍因素与促进因素的系统评价及干预措施的策略性行为分析
Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 6;15(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01001-2.
10
Health professional and patient views of a novel prognostic test for melanoma: A theoretically informed qualitative study.健康专业人员和患者对一种新型黑色素瘤预后检测的看法:一项基于理论的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0265048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265048. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to pharmacological therapy for hypertension in Portugal: a health professionals focus groups study.葡萄牙高血压药物治疗的依从性:一项卫生专业人员焦点小组研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 18;26(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02705-4.
2
Adherence to pharmacological therapy in patients with hypertension: protocol of a qualitative study by focus groups.高血压患者药物治疗依从性:一项焦点小组定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 9;14(4):e076416. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076416.

本文引用的文献

1
Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants.全球高血压患病率趋势及 1990 至 2019 年治疗和控制进展情况:1040 万参与者、1201 项人群代表性研究的汇总分析
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):957-980. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
2
Hypertension healthcare professional beliefs and behaviour regarding patient medication adherence: a survey conducted among European Society of Hypertension Centres of Excellence.高血压专业医护人员对患者用药依从性的信念和行为:一项在欧洲高血压学会卓越中心中进行的调查。
Blood Press. 2021 Oct;30(5):282-290. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2021.1963209. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
3
Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study.全球心血管疾病负担及危险因素, 1990-2019:来自 GBD 2019 研究的更新。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2982-3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.
4
Awareness about barriers to medication adherence in cardiovascular patients and strategies used in clinical practice by Portuguese clinicians: a nationwide study.心血管病患者药物治疗依从性障碍及葡萄牙临床医生在临床实践中应用的策略的认知情况:一项全国性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):629-636. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01174-2. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
5
Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 87 种风险因素的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.
6
Trends in Blood Pressure Control Among US Adults With Hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018.美国成年人高血压患者血压控制趋势,1999-2000 年至 2017-2018 年。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1190-1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14545.
7
Impact of Pharmacist-Led Interventions on Medication Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia: A Scoping Review of Published Literature.药师主导的干预措施对高血压和高脂血症患者药物依从性及临床结局的影响:已发表文献的范围综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Jul 20;13:635-645. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S257273. eCollection 2020.
8
How can use of the Theoretical Domains Framework be optimized in qualitative research? A rapid systematic review.如何在定性研究中优化理论领域框架的使用?快速系统评价。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):677-694. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12437. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
9
Nonadherence to antihypertensive medications is related to pill burden in apparent treatment-resistant hypertensive individuals.抗高血压药物的不依从与明显治疗抵抗性高血压个体的药物负担有关。
J Hypertens. 2020 Jun;38(6):1165-1173. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002398.
10
Association Between Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence and Hypertension Management Among US Adults.美国成年人中与费用相关的药物不依从与高血压管理之间的关联。
Am J Hypertens. 2020 Sep 10;33(9):879-886. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa072.