Paillaud Elena, Brugel Lydia, Bertolus Chloe, Baron Melany, Bequignon Emilie, Caillet Philippe, Schouman Thomas, Lacau Saint Guily Jean, Périé Sophie, Bouvard Eric, Laurent Marie, Salvan Didier, Chaumette Laurence, de Decker Laure, Piot Benoit, Barry Beatrix, Raynaud-Simon Agathe, Sauvaget Elisabeth, Bach Christine, Bizard Antoine, Bounar Abderrahmane, Minard Aurelien, Aziz Bechara, Chevalier Eric, Chevalier Dominique, Gaxatte Cedric, Malard Olivier, Liuu Evelyne, Lacour Sandrine, Gregoire Laetitia, Lafont Charlotte, Canouï-Poitrine Florence
IMRB, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université Paris-Est Créteil, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Département de Gériatrie, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), F-75015 Paris, France.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;14(13):3290. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133290.
This study assesses the efficacy of Geriatric Assessment (GA)-driven interventions and follow-up on six-month mortality, functional, and nutritional status in older patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). HNC patients aged 65 years or over were included between November 2013 and September 2018 by 15 Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) and maxillofacial surgery departments at 13 centers in France. The study was of an open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled, and parallel-group design, with independent outcome assessments. The patients were randomized 1:1 to benefit from GA-driven interventions and follow-up versus standard of care. The interventions consisted in a pre-therapeutic GA, a standardized geriatric intervention, and follow-up, tailored to the cancer-treatment plan for 24 months. The primary outcome was a composite criterion including six-month mortality, functional impairment (fall in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score ≥2), and weight loss ≥10%. Among the patients included ( = 499), 475 were randomized to the experimental ( = 238) or control arm ( = 237). The median age was 75.3 years [70.4-81.9]; 69.5% were men, and the principal tumor site was oral cavity (43.9%). There were no statistically significant differences regarding the primary endpoint ( = 98 events; 41.0% in the experimental arm versus 90 (38.0%); = 0.53), or for each criterion (i.e., death (31 (13%) versus 27 (11.4%); = 0.48), weight loss of ≥10% (69 (29%) versus 65 (27.4%); = 0.73) and fall in ADL score ≥2 (9 (3.8%) versus 13 (5.5%); = 0.35)). In older patients with HNC, GA-driven interventions and follow-up failed to improve six-month overall survival, functional, and nutritional status.
本研究评估老年评估(GA)驱动的干预措施及随访对老年头颈癌(HNC)患者六个月死亡率、功能和营养状况的疗效。2013年11月至2018年9月期间,法国13个中心的15个耳鼻喉(ENT)和颌面外科科室纳入了65岁及以上的HNC患者。该研究采用开放标签、多中心、随机、对照和平行组设计,并进行独立的结果评估。患者按1:1随机分组,分别接受GA驱动的干预措施及随访与标准治疗。干预措施包括治疗前GA、标准化老年干预措施以及根据癌症治疗计划进行为期24个月的随访定制。主要结局是一个综合标准,包括六个月死亡率、功能损害(日常生活活动(ADL)评分下降≥2分)和体重减轻≥10%。在纳入的患者中(n = 499),475例被随机分配至试验组(n = 238)或对照组(n = 237)。中位年龄为75.3岁[70.4 - 81.9];69.5%为男性,主要肿瘤部位为口腔(43.9%)。在主要终点方面(98例事件;试验组为41.0%,对照组为90例(38.0%);P = 0.53),或在每个标准方面(即死亡(31例(13%)对27例(11.4%);P = 0.48)、体重减轻≥10%(69例(29%)对65例(27.4%);P = 0.73)以及ADL评分下降≥2分(9例(3.8%)对13例(5.5%);P = 0.35)),均无统计学显著差异。在老年HNC患者中,GA驱动的干预措施及随访未能改善六个月的总生存率、功能和营养状况。