• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭支持型主管行为与心理困扰:横跨四大职业群体的二次分析。

Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors and Psychological Distress: A Secondary Analysis across Four Occupational Populations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA.

Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 26;19(13):7845. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137845.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19137845
PMID:35805503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9265756/
Abstract

This study assessed the associations of employee's perceptions of family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB) and their psychological distress across four occupational populations ( = 3778): Information technology; healthcare; military-connected Veterans; and National Guard service members. Data were gathered and analyzed from four larger archival datasets to compare differences in these relationships. Results revealed significant negative relationships between employee reports of FSSB and their psychological distress within occupations, as expected. Furthermore, results revealed significant differences across occupational populations for employee reports of both FSSB and psychological distress. Hierarchical moderated multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the extent of these mean differences across groups. Results revealed significant differences among these four groups such that the military-connected Veteran employees demonstrated significantly stronger associations of FSSB, and psychological distress compared to the other three occupations of information technology, healthcare, and National Guard service members. These findings suggest the importance of FSSB to worker psychological health across a variety of occupational populations, specifically noting the importance and presence of FSSB for Veteran employees' psychological distress in civilian workplaces. Practical implications include the need for training leaders on how to better support employees' work and non-work lives, mental health, and well-being.

摘要

本研究评估了员工对支持家庭的主管行为(FSSB)的看法及其在四个职业群体(=3778)中的心理困扰之间的关联:信息技术;医疗保健;与军队有关的退伍军人;以及国民警卫队成员。从四个更大的档案数据集中收集和分析数据,以比较这些关系中的差异。结果显示,员工对 FSSB 的报告与其心理困扰之间存在显著的负相关关系,这是预期的。此外,结果还显示,员工对 FSSB 和心理困扰的报告在职业群体之间存在显著差异。进行了分层调节多元回归分析,以检验这些群体之间的平均差异程度。结果表明,这四个群体之间存在显著差异,与其他三个职业(信息技术、医疗保健和国民警卫队成员)相比,与军队有关的退伍军人员工表现出 FSSB 和心理困扰之间更强的关联。这些发现表明,FSSB 对各种职业群体的工人心理健康很重要,特别是注意到 FSSB 对退伍军人员工在民用工作场所的心理困扰的重要性和存在性。实际影响包括需要培训领导者如何更好地支持员工的工作和非工作生活、心理健康和幸福感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde4/9265756/3b7b468581ce/ijerph-19-07845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde4/9265756/3b7b468581ce/ijerph-19-07845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde4/9265756/3b7b468581ce/ijerph-19-07845-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors and Psychological Distress: A Secondary Analysis across Four Occupational Populations.家庭支持型主管行为与心理困扰:横跨四大职业群体的二次分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 26;19(13):7845. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137845.
2
Linking Workplace Aggression to Employee Well-Being and Work: The Moderating Role of Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB).将职场攻击行为与员工福祉及工作相联系:家庭支持型主管行为(FSSB)的调节作用
J Bus Psychol. 2017 Apr;32(2):179-196. doi: 10.1007/s10869-016-9443-z. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
3
The relationship between leadership support and employee sleep.领导支持与员工睡眠之间的关系。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2020 Jun;25(3):187-202. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000173. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
4
Lasting Impression: Transformational Leadership and Family Supportive Supervision as Resources for Well-being and Performance.持久影响:变革型领导与家庭支持性监督作为幸福与绩效的资源
Occup Health Sci. 2018 Mar;2(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s41542-018-0012-x. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Measurement development and validation of the Family Supportive Supervisor Behavior Short-Form (FSSB-SF).家庭支持性主管行为简短量表(FSSB-SF)的编制与验证。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Jul;18(3):285-96. doi: 10.1037/a0032612. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
6
Mediation of work-family support and affective commitment between family supportive supervisor Behaviour and workplace deviance.家庭支持型主管行为与工作场所偏差行为之间工作-家庭支持及情感承诺的中介作用
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 7;9(11):e21509. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21509. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
The influence of family-supportive supervisor training on employee job performance and attitudes: An organizational work-family intervention.家庭支持型主管培训对员工工作绩效和态度的影响:组织工作-家庭干预。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;21(3):296-308. doi: 10.1037/a0039961. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
8
Validation of the Japanese Version of the Multidimensional Measure of Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB-J).日本版家庭支持性主管行为多维量表(FSSB-J)的验证
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 22;10:2628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02628. eCollection 2019.
9
Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors Moderate Associations between Work Stress and Exhaustion: Testing the Job Demands-Resources Model in Academic Staff at an Austrian Medical University.家庭支持型主管行为调节工作压力与疲惫感之间的关系:在奥地利一所医科大学的学术人员中检验工作要求-资源模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 9;19(9):5769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095769.
10
Are different generations of female employees trapped by work-family conflicts? A study on the impact of family-supportive supervisor behavior on thriving at work.不同代际的女性员工是否陷入了工作与家庭的冲突之中?一项关于家庭支持型主管行为对工作活力影响的研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 21;15:1339899. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1339899. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Mediation of work-family support and affective commitment between family supportive supervisor Behaviour and workplace deviance.家庭支持型主管行为与工作场所偏差行为之间工作-家庭支持及情感承诺的中介作用
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 7;9(11):e21509. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21509. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Family-supportive supervisor behaviors and career sustainability of e-commerce female workers: A mixed-method approach.家庭支持型主管行为与电商女性员工的职业可持续性:一种混合方法研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 27;13:992458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992458. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Can supervisor support improve daily employee well-being? Evidence of supervisor training effectiveness in a study of veteran employee emotions.上级支持能否改善员工的日常幸福感?一项关于老员工情绪的研究中上级培训效果的证据。
J Occup Organ Psychol. 2021;94(2):400-426.
2
Social Connection as a Public Health Issue: The Evidence and a Systemic Framework for Prioritizing the "Social" in Social Determinants of Health.作为公共卫生问题的社会联系:健康社会决定因素中对“社会”进行优先排序的证据及系统框架。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:193-213. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-110732. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
3
Effects of a Total Worker Health® leadership intervention on employee well-being and functional impairment.
《全面职工健康管理®领导力干预对员工健康和功能障碍的影响》
J Occup Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;26(6):582-598. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000312.
4
How do family supportive supervisors affect nurses' thriving: A research before and during COVID-19 pandemic.家庭支持型主管如何影响护士的茁壮成长:COVID-19 大流行前后的研究。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2021 Dec;35(6):602-609. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
5
U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities.美国一线工作者与 COVID-19 相关的不平等现象。
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106833. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106833. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
6
The Interplay of Workplace Redesign and Public Policy in the 21st Century.21世纪工作场所重新设计与公共政策的相互作用
Am J Public Health. 2021 Oct;111(10):1784-1786. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306368. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
7
Moral distress in frontline healthcare workers in the initial epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: Relationship to PTSD symptoms, burnout, and psychosocial functioning.美国 COVID-19 大流行初始中心一线医护人员的道德困境:与 PTSD 症状、倦怠和心理社会功能的关系。
Depress Anxiety. 2021 Oct;38(10):1007-1017. doi: 10.1002/da.23205. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Working in lockdown: the relationship between COVID-19 induced work stressors, job performance, distress, and life satisfaction.在封锁状态下工作:新冠疫情引发的工作压力源、工作绩效、痛苦与生活满意度之间的关系。
Curr Psychol. 2021;40(12):6308-6323. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01567-0. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
9
A Comparison of Safety, Health, and Well-Being Risk Factors Across Five Occupational Samples.五种职业样本的安全、健康和幸福感风险因素比较。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 5;9:614725. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.614725. eCollection 2021.
10
Gender differences in couples' division of childcare, work and mental health during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间夫妻在育儿、工作分工及心理健康方面的性别差异
Rev Econ Househ. 2021;19(1):11-40. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09534-7. Epub 2021 Jan 16.