Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University.
Department of Psychology, San José State University.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;26(6):582-598. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000312.
Although evidence has been mounting that supervisor support training interventions promote employee job, health, and well-being outcomes, there is little understanding of the mechanisms by which such interventions operate (e.g., Hammer et al., 2022; Inceoglu et al., 2018), nor about the integration of such organizational-level interventions with individual-level interventions (e.g., Lamontagne et al., 2007). Thus, the present study attempts to unpack the mechanisms through which supervisor support training interventions operate. In addition, the present study examines an integrated Total Worker Health® intervention that combines health protection in the form of supervisor support training (i.e., family supportive supervisor behaviors and supervisor support for sleep health) with a health promotion approach in the form of feedback to improve sleep health behaviors. Using a cluster randomized controlled trial drawing on a sample of 704 full-time employees, results demonstrate that the Total Worker Health intervention improves employee job well-being (i.e., increased job satisfaction and reduced turnover intentions), personal well-being (i.e., reduced stress before bedtime), and reduces personal and social functional impairment at 9 months postbaseline through employee reports of supervisors' support for sleep at 4 months postbaseline, but not through family supportive supervisor behaviors. Effects were not found for general stress or occupational functional impairment outcomes. Implications are discussed, including theoretical mechanisms by which leadership interventions affect employees, supervisor training, as well as the role of integrated organizational and individual-level interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管越来越多的证据表明,主管支持培训干预措施可以促进员工的工作、健康和幸福感,但人们对这些干预措施的作用机制(例如,Hammer 等人,2022 年;Inceoglu 等人,2018 年)知之甚少,也不清楚如何将这些组织层面的干预措施与个人层面的干预措施(例如,Lamontagne 等人,2007 年)结合起来。因此,本研究试图阐明主管支持培训干预措施的作用机制。此外,本研究还考察了一种综合的“整体员工健康”干预措施,该措施将以主管支持培训(即支持家庭的主管行为和主管对睡眠健康的支持)的形式进行健康保护与以反馈形式进行健康促进相结合,以改善睡眠健康行为。本研究采用了一项基于 704 名全职员工的样本的集群随机对照试验,结果表明,“整体员工健康”干预措施通过员工在基线后 4 个月报告主管对睡眠的支持,提高了员工的工作幸福感(即增加了工作满意度和减少离职意向)、个人幸福感(即减少睡前压力),并减少了个人和社会功能障碍,在基线后 9 个月通过员工报告的主管对睡眠的支持,但不能通过支持家庭的主管行为。没有发现一般压力或职业功能障碍结果的影响。讨论了其影响,包括领导力干预措施影响员工的理论机制、主管培训,以及综合组织和个人层面干预措施的作用。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。