Sebastian Ronin, Paul Santhosh T, Azher Umme, Reddy Divya
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Annoor Dental College and Hospital, Muvattupuzha, Kerala, India.
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):69-73. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2339.
To evaluate and compare the remineralization potential of CPP-ACP, nano-hydroxyapatite, and calcium sucrose phosphate toothpaste on artificial enamel caries lesions by means of microhardness testing.
Twenty sound human primary molars, extracted for therapeutic reasons were selected for this study. From each tooth, two enamel specimens were prepared and embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and each block contains five tooth samples. After polishing, the baseline hardness of the enamel surface (KHN) was determined by Knoop microhardness testing. Then the specimens were randomly assigned into four groups ( = 10), according to the remineralizing agent used: group I: Control, group II: GC Tooth Mousse (CCP-ACP), group III: Acclaim (nano-HAP), and group IV: EnaFix (CaSP). The specimens were then immersed in a demineralizing solution and post-lesion KHN values were obtained as baseline measurements. Later remineralizing agent was applied and after 7 days of remineralization, posttreatment KHN tests were conducted.
Data were analyzed using paired test, analysis of variance, and Tukey HSD test. Mean enamel surface microhardness (KHN) values after remineralization shows that group IV (EnaFix) had maximum hardness number (114.71 ± 12.27) followed by group III (Acclaim) (85.14 ± 22.82) and group II (GC Tooth Mousse) (56.42 ± 19.90). The difference was statistically significant ( < 0.001). Similarly the %SMHR was also highest in group IV (EnaFix), followed by group III (Acclaim) and group II (GC Tooth Mousse).
EnaFix (calcium sucrose phosphate) shows a maximum increase in the enamel surface microhardness followed by Acclaim (nano-HAP) and GC Tooth Mousse.
Calcium Sucrose Phosphate in toothpaste strengthened the enamel more than nano hydroxyapatite and CPP-ACP, and can be an alternative to the use of fluoride toothpaste in children.
Sebastian R, Paul ST, Azher U, Comparison of Remineralization Potential of Casein Phosphopeptide: Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Nano-hydroxyapatite and Calcium Sucrose Phosphate on Artificial Enamel Lesions: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(1):69-73.
通过显微硬度测试评估并比较酪蛋白磷酸肽 - 无定形磷酸钙(CPP - ACP)、纳米羟基磷灰石和磷酸蔗糖钙牙膏对人工釉质龋损的再矿化潜力。
选取因治疗原因拔除的20颗健康人乳牙用于本研究。从每颗牙齿制备两个釉质标本并嵌入丙烯酸树脂块中,每个块包含五个牙齿样本。抛光后,通过努氏显微硬度测试确定釉质表面的基线硬度(KHN)。然后根据使用的再矿化剂将标本随机分为四组(每组 = 10):第一组:对照组;第二组:GC护齿泡沫(CCP - ACP);第三组:Acclaim(纳米 - HAP);第四组:EnaFix(CaSP)。然后将标本浸入脱矿溶液中,并获得病变后KHN值作为基线测量值。之后施加再矿化剂,再矿化7天后进行治疗后KHN测试。
使用配对t检验、方差分析和Tukey HSD检验分析数据。再矿化后釉质表面显微硬度(KHN)的平均值显示,第四组(EnaFix)的硬度值最高(114.71±12.27),其次是第三组(Acclaim)(85.14±22.82)和第二组(GC护齿泡沫)(56.42±19.90)。差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。同样,第四组(EnaFix)的%SMHR也最高,其次是第三组(Acclaim)和第二组(GC护齿泡沫)。
EnaFix(磷酸蔗糖钙)使釉质表面显微硬度增加最多,其次是Acclaim(纳米 - HAP)和GC护齿泡沫。
牙膏中的磷酸蔗糖钙比纳米羟基磷灰石和CPP - ACP更能增强釉质,可作为儿童使用含氟牙膏的替代品。
Sebastian R, Paul ST, Azher U, 酪蛋白磷酸肽:无定形磷酸钙、纳米羟基磷灰石和磷酸蔗糖钙对人工釉质病变再矿化潜力的比较:一项体外研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2022;15(1):69 - 73。