Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 00 Prague-Uhřínevěs, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56798-w.
Individual housing of dairy calves is common farm practice, but has negative effects on calf welfare. A compromise between practice and welfare may be housing calves in pairs. We compared learning performances and affective states as assessed in a judgement bias task of individually housed and pair-housed calves. Twenty-two calves from each housing treatment were trained on a spatial Go/No-go task with active trial initiation to discriminate between the location of a teat-bucket signalling either reward (positive location) or non-reward (negative location). We compared the number of trials to learn the operant task (OT) for the trial initiation and to finish the subsequent discrimination task (DT). Ten pair-housed and ten individually housed calves were then tested for their responses to ambiguous stimuli positioned in-between the positive and negative locations. Housing did not affect learning speed (OT: F = 0.39, P = 0.54; DT: F = 0.15, P = 0.70), but pair-housed calves responded more positively to ambiguous cues than individually housed calves (χ = 6.79, P = 0.009), indicating more positive affective states. This is the first study to demonstrate that pair housing improves the affective aspect of calf welfare when compared to individual housing.
奶牛犊单独饲养是常见的农场实践,但对犊牛福利有负面影响。在实践和福利之间可能存在妥协,即成对饲养犊牛。我们比较了单独饲养和成对饲养的犊牛在判断偏差任务中评估的学习表现和情感状态。每组 22 头犊牛分别接受了带有主动试验启动的空间 Go/No-go 任务的训练,以区分指示奖励(正位置)或非奖励(负位置)的奶嘴桶位置。我们比较了学习操作性任务(OT)的试验启动次数和完成随后的辨别任务(DT)的次数。然后,对 10 头成对饲养的和 10 头单独饲养的犊牛进行测试,以了解它们对位于正位置和负位置之间的模糊刺激的反应。饲养方式不影响学习速度(OT:F=0.39,P=0.54;DT:F=0.15,P=0.70),但成对饲养的犊牛对模糊线索的反应比单独饲养的犊牛更积极(χ=6.79,P=0.009),表明它们的情感状态更积极。这是第一项表明与单独饲养相比,成对饲养可提高犊牛福利情感方面的研究。