Dean Evan E, Little Lauren, Tomchek Scott, Wallisch Anna, Dunn Winnie
Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Department of Occupational Therapy Education, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 23;13:875972. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875972. eCollection 2022.
Research about children tends to consider differences from expected patterns problematic, and associates differences with disabilities [e.g., Autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)]. When we focus on disabilities and consider differences automatically problematic, we miss the natural variability in the general population. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF 11) acknowledges that the experience of disability results from interactions between "environmental" and "personal" factors which determine the person's capacity to participate. The purpose of this study was to examine sensory patterns across a national sample of children in the general population and samples of children with disabilities to investigate the extent to which differences in sensory processing are representative of natural variability rather than automatically problematic or part of a disability.
We employed descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to examine sensory processing patterns in children in the general population and autistic children and children with ADHD. We used standardization and validity data from the Sensory Profile 2 to conduct analyses.
Consistent sensory patterns exist across all groups. Children in all groups had different rates of certain patterns.
Since children in all groups have certain sensory patterns, we cannot associate differences with problematic behaviors. Children participating successfully with all sensory patterns might provide insights for universal design that supports participation of all children.
关于儿童的研究往往将与预期模式的差异视为问题,并将差异与残疾联系起来[例如,自闭症、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)]。当我们关注残疾并自动将差异视为问题时,我们就忽略了普通人群中的自然变异性。《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF 11)承认,残疾体验是由决定个人参与能力的“环境”和“个人”因素之间的相互作用导致的。本研究的目的是在全国普通儿童样本以及残疾儿童样本中检查感觉模式,以调查感觉处理差异在多大程度上代表自然变异性,而不是自动成为问题或残疾的一部分。
我们采用描述性统计和卡方检验来检查普通儿童、自闭症儿童和多动症儿童的感觉处理模式。我们使用来自《感觉概况2》的标准化和有效性数据进行分析。
所有组都存在一致的感觉模式。所有组中的儿童某些模式的发生率不同。
由于所有组中的儿童都有某些感觉模式,我们不能将差异与问题行为联系起来。成功参与所有感觉模式的儿童可能会为支持所有儿童参与的通用设计提供见解。