Buggio Laura, Somigliana Edgardo, Sergenti Greta, Ottolini Federica, Dridi Dhouha, Vercellini Paolo
Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Commenda, 12 - 20122, Milan, Italy.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Reprod Sci. 2022 Dec;29(12):3508-3515. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01009-7. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
AGD is the distance measured from the anus to the genital tubercle. Recent evidence suggests that a shorter AGD, a sensitive biomarker of the prenatal hormonal environment, could be associated with higher endometriosis risk. However, studies investigating AGD in affected women are scanty. We have set up a case-control study recruiting nulliparous women (aged 18-40 years) with endometriosis between 2017 and 2018. Cases were 90 women with a surgical or with a current nonsurgical diagnosis of endometriosis (n = 45 deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), and n = 45 ovarian endometrioma (OMA)). Controls were 45 asymptomatic women referring for periodical gynaecological care and without a previous diagnosis of endometriosis. They were matched to cases for age and BMI. For each woman, two measures were obtained using a digital calliper: AGD, from the clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus, and AGD, from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus. Each distance was derived from the mean of six measurements acquired from two different gynaecologists. The mean ± SD AGD in women with DIE, OMA and without a diagnosis of endometriosis was 76.0 ± 12.1, 76.1 ± 11.1 and 77.8 ± 11.4 mm, respectively (p = 0.55). The mean ± SD AGD in women with DIE, OMA and without a diagnosis of endometriosis was 22.8 ± 5.0, 21.7 ± 9.0 and 23.7 ± 7.8 mm, respectively (p = 0.38). Our study failed to find an association between AGD and the presence of endometriosis. AGD does not seem to represent a reliable indicator of the presence of endometriosis to be used in clinical practice.
肛门生殖距(AGD)是指从肛门到生殖结节的距离。最近的证据表明,较短的AGD是产前激素环境的一个敏感生物标志物,可能与子宫内膜异位症风险较高有关。然而,针对患病女性AGD的研究较少。我们开展了一项病例对照研究,在2017年至2018年期间招募未生育的子宫内膜异位症女性(年龄18 - 40岁)。病例组为90名经手术或目前非手术诊断为子宫内膜异位症的女性(n = 45例深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症(DIE),n = 45例卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿(OMA))。对照组为45名因定期妇科检查前来就诊且既往无子宫内膜异位症诊断的无症状女性。她们在年龄和体重指数方面与病例组相匹配。对于每位女性,使用数字卡尺测量两个指标:从阴蒂表面到肛门上缘的AGD,以及从后阴唇系带到肛门上缘的AGD。每个距离均来自两位不同妇科医生进行的六次测量的平均值。DIE组、OMA组和未诊断为子宫内膜异位症的女性的平均±标准差AGD分别为76.0±12.1、76.1±11.1和77.8±11.4毫米(p = 0.55)。DIE组、OMA组和未诊断为子宫内膜异位症的女性的平均±标准差AGD分别为22.8±5.0、21.7±9.0和23.7±7.8毫米(p = 0.38)。我们的研究未发现AGD与子宫内膜异位症的存在之间存在关联。AGD似乎并非临床实践中用于判断子宫内膜异位症存在的可靠指标。