Suppr超能文献

经股静脉-颈静脉联合入路使用器械夹取复杂滤器 2 例报告。使用器械钩取滤器顶端并解锁,双入路取滤器。

Complex filter removal using forceps from combined transfemoral and transjugular approach unhooking the filter apex using forceps and dual access: Two case reports.

机构信息

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Methodist Hospital Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2022 Sep;37(9):2867-2872. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16669. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

Abstract

Modern inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) are intended to be retrieved once a thrombotic process or risk of pulmonary embolism has resolved independent of administration of anticoagulation. IVCF removal can be challenging with the risk of complications including venous perforation, filter migration, and device fracture. IVCF removal has been described using the nomenclature of routine versus advanced retrieval. Routine retrieval is defined as accessing the filter hook with a loop snare device before advancing a sheath over the filter. Advanced retrieval techniques are employed when routine retrieval fails and can refer to a variety of approaches, including filter realignment with loop snare, stiff wire-displacement, use of a wire and snare with dual access, angioplasty balloon advanced over a guidewire, single access sling approach, the sandwich technique, the endobronchial forceps dissection and removal, photothermic ablation with excimer laser, and the filter eversion technique among others. Successful routine retrieval of IVCF has been reported at 74% and IVCF retrieval with advanced techniques has a success rate of nearly 95%. The complication rate with advanced techniques is higher when compared with routine techniques (5.3% vs. 0.4%; p < .05) and, as expected, requires fluoroscopic time. We report two cases of advanced filter retrieval using endobronchial forceps simultaneously or sequentially through the transfemoral and trans-jugular approach.

摘要

现代下腔静脉滤器(IVCF)旨在在血栓形成过程或肺栓塞风险得到解决后,独立于抗凝治疗进行取回。IVCF 取出可能具有挑战性,存在包括静脉穿孔、滤器迁移和器械断裂在内的并发症风险。IVCF 取出可以使用常规与高级取回的命名法来描述。常规取回是指在将护套推进过滤器之前,用环套圈装置访问过滤器钩。当常规取回失败时,会采用高级取回技术,可以指各种方法,包括用环套圈对过滤器进行重新定位、硬钢丝置换、使用带有双通路的钢丝和套圈、在导丝上推进血管成形术球囊、单通路吊索方法、夹心技术、支气管内钳子解剖和移除、准分子激光光热消融术,以及滤器外翻技术等。报告的 IVCF 常规取回成功率为 74%,而高级技术的 IVCF 取回成功率接近 95%。与常规技术相比,高级技术的并发症发生率更高(5.3%比 0.4%;p<.05),并且如预期的那样,需要透视时间。我们报告了通过经股和经颈静脉途径同时或序贯使用支气管内钳子进行高级过滤器取回的两个病例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验