Suppr超能文献

UAV 喷雾在葡萄园中的应用:飞行模式和喷雾系统调整对树冠沉积、覆盖和靶外损失的影响。

UAV-spray application in vineyards: Flight modes and spray system adjustment effects on canopy deposit, coverage, and off-target losses.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DiSAFA), Università degli Studi di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DiSAFA), Università degli Studi di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 1;845:157292. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157292. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

Abstract

Improvements in the spray application of plant protection products enhance agricultural sustainability by reducing environmental contamination, but by increasing food quality and human safety. Currently, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are raising interest in spray applications in 3D crops. However, operational configurations of UAV-spray systems need further investigation to maximise the deposition in the canopy and minimise the off-target losses. Our experimental research focused on investigating the effects on the canopy spray deposition and coverage due to different UAV-spray system configurations. Twelve configurations were tested under field conditions in an experimental vineyard (cv. Barbera), derived from the combination of different UAV flight modes (band and broadcast spray applications), nozzle types (conventional and air inclusion), and UAV cruise speeds (1 and 3 m s). Also, the best treatment, among those tested, by using the UAV-spray system and a traditional airblast sprayer were compared. The data was analysed by testing the effects of the three operational parameters and their two- and three-way interactions by means of linear mixed models. The results indicated that the flight mode deeply affects spray application efficiency. Compared to the broadcast spray modes, the band spray mode was able to increase the average canopy deposition from 0.052 to 0.161 μL cm (+ 309 %) and reduce the average ground losses from 0.544 to 0.246 μL cm (- 54 %). The conventional airblast sprayer, operated at a low spray application rate, showed higher canopy coverage and lower ground losses in comparison to the best UAV-spray system configuration.

摘要

改进植保产品的喷雾应用,通过减少环境污染,提高了农业的可持续性,但同时也提高了食品质量和人类安全性。目前,无人机(UAV)在 3D 作物的喷雾应用中引起了人们的兴趣。然而,为了最大限度地提高树冠沉积量并最小化非靶标损失,UAV 喷雾系统的操作配置仍需要进一步研究。我们的实验研究集中在调查不同 UAV 喷雾系统配置对树冠喷雾沉积和覆盖的影响。在一个实验葡萄园(cv. Barbera)中,在田间条件下测试了 12 种配置,这些配置是通过不同的 UAV 飞行模式(带式和广播喷雾应用)、喷嘴类型(常规和空气夹带)和 UAV 巡航速度(1 和 3 m/s)的组合得出的。此外,还比较了在测试的那些配置中,使用 UAV 喷雾系统和传统的风送式喷雾器的最佳处理方法。通过线性混合模型测试了三个操作参数及其两两和三三交互作用的影响,对数据进行了分析。结果表明,飞行模式对喷雾应用效率有很大影响。与广播喷雾模式相比,带式喷雾模式能够将平均树冠沉积量从 0.052 μL/cm 增加到 0.161 μL/cm(增加 309%),并将平均地面损失从 0.544 μL/cm 减少到 0.246 μL/cm(减少 54%)。与最佳 UAV 喷雾系统配置相比,以低喷雾应用率运行的常规风送式喷雾器显示出更高的树冠覆盖率和更低的地面损失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验