Felipe Oliveira Ribeiro Luis, Leandro da Vitória Edney, Pereira Bastos Halisson, Vieira Zanelato Jacimar, de Assis Martins Júnior José, de Vicente Ferraz Alexandre, Gomes Dos Santos Thales, de Assis Ferreira Francisco, Victor Oliveira Ribeiro João, de Assis Silva Samuel, Chen Pengchao
Department of Agricultural and Biological Sciences (DCAB), Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), São Mateus, ES, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Tropical Agriculture (PPGAT), Federal University of Espirito Santo, São Mateus, ES, Brazil.
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jan 17;15:1504608. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1504608. eCollection 2024.
The use of remotely piloted aircrafts (RPAs) for foliar application of pesticides and fertilizers has increased worldwide in several agricultural crops. However, there is little information on the efficiency and factors connected to application and spraying quality of RPAs in forestry, mainly for eradication of eucalyptus sprouts. The objective of this work was to evaluate droplet distribution and deposition on eucalyptus sprouts and the risk of exposure for applicators using an RPA (DJI AGRAS T40) at different theoretical application ranges (7.0, 9.0, and 11.0 m) and droplet sizes (150, 300, and 450µm) compared to a manual electric backpack sprayer (MEBS). The spray solution was composed of water, brilliant blue dye, and adjuvant. Water-sensitive paper cards and flexible polyvinyl chloride cards were positioned on different eucalyptus sprout canopy layers (ESCL) (upper, middle, and lower) to evaluate droplet distribution and deposition. Disposable coveralls, gloves, and respirators were used to evaluate the risk of occupational exposure. The results showed that the application ranges of 7.0 and 9.0 m with droplet sizes of 150µm and 300µm resulted in better droplet distribution throughout the ESCLs. However, the 450µm droplet size resulted in concentration of droplets in the upper ESCL. Using an MEBS resulted in greater heterogeneity in droplet distribution and approximately a 160-fold higher accumulation of droplets on different applicator's body parts compared to the RPA. The results confirmed the efficiency and operational safety of using RPAs for the application of agricultural pesticides and foliar fertilizers in eucalyptus plantations, as well as providing valuable contributions for future research on these practices in eucalyptus cultivation.
在全球范围内,使用遥控飞机(RPAs)进行农药和肥料的叶面喷施在多种农作物上的应用有所增加。然而,关于RPAs在林业中应用及喷雾质量的效率和相关因素的信息却很少,主要是针对桉树萌芽的根除。这项工作的目的是评估在不同理论喷施范围(7.0、9.0和11.0米)和液滴大小(150、300和450微米)下,使用RPA(大疆农业T40)与手动电动背负式喷雾器(MEBS)相比,液滴在桉树萌芽上的分布和沉积情况以及施药人员的暴露风险。喷雾溶液由水、亮蓝染料和助剂组成。将水敏纸卡和柔性聚氯乙烯卡放置在不同的桉树萌芽冠层(ESCL)(上部、中部和下部)上,以评估液滴的分布和沉积。使用一次性工作服、手套和呼吸器来评估职业暴露风险。结果表明,喷施范围为7.0和9.0米、液滴大小为150微米和300微米时,在整个ESCL中液滴分布更好。然而,450微米的液滴大小导致液滴集中在上部ESCL中。与RPA相比,使用MEBS导致液滴分布的异质性更大,并且在施药人员身体不同部位的液滴积累量大约高出160倍。结果证实了在桉树种植园中使用RPAs进行农药和叶面肥料喷施的效率和操作安全性,也为未来桉树种植中这些实践的研究提供了有价值的贡献。