Section of Cancer Economics and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Brazil Governance Network, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022 Jul;42:429-437. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_359650.
Precision medicine changes the landscape of oncology practices by offering the opportunity to optimize care through a more targeted, personalized approach of managing cancer treatments. However, precision oncology is costly and does not benefit all patients with cancer, making it critically important to consider the tradeoff between costs and health benefits. Here, we discuss the global challenges in implementing precision oncology from the perspective of health care management and health economics and emphasize the different challenges for high-income compared with low- and middle-income countries. For health care managers making resource allocation decisions, the decision to adopt, implement, and finance precision oncology must consider opportunity costs, and the allocation must be proportional to the system's capacity. The standard approach of health technology assessment is inadequate because it fails to consider the capacity to pay. From an economic perspective, global implementation of precision oncology must confront the issues of accessibility, affordability, and system readiness. Low- and middle-income countries often have no or delayed access to novel targeted-therapy agents, find these drugs cost-prohibitive, and struggle to build the infrastructure with sufficient workforce and adequate testing and computing facilities to capitalize the benefit of precision oncology. Although high-income countries are better equipped to implement precision oncology, the challenges there lie in implementing strategies to maximize the value of precision oncology through promoting appropriate use while limiting inappropriate applications. The recent rollout of COVID-19 vaccines internationally highlights the importance of information uncertainty and offers valuable insights on global access to and implementation of precision oncology.
精准医学通过更具针对性、个性化的癌症治疗管理方法改变了肿瘤学实践的格局。然而,精准肿瘤学成本高昂,并非所有癌症患者都能从中受益,因此,必须认真权衡成本和健康获益。在此,我们从医疗保健管理和卫生经济学的角度讨论实施精准肿瘤学的全球挑战,并强调高收入国家与低收入和中等收入国家面临的不同挑战。对于做出资源配置决策的医疗保健管理者来说,决定是否采用、实施和资助精准肿瘤学必须考虑机会成本,并且分配必须与系统能力成比例。由于未能考虑支付能力,传统的卫生技术评估方法并不适用。从经济学角度来看,全球实施精准肿瘤学必须面对可及性、可负担性和系统准备度的问题。低收入和中等收入国家通常无法获得或延迟获得新型靶向治疗药物,这些药物价格昂贵,且难以建立拥有足够劳动力和充足检测与计算设施的基础设施,以充分利用精准肿瘤学的获益。尽管高收入国家在实施精准肿瘤学方面的条件更好,但也面临着通过推广适当的应用来最大程度地发挥精准肿瘤学的价值,同时限制不适当应用的策略实施的挑战。最近在国际范围内推出的 COVID-19 疫苗突出了信息不确定性的重要性,并为全球获得和实施精准肿瘤学提供了有价值的见解。