• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性难治性心原性休克患者登记研究——PREPARE 心原性休克登记研究。

PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock-The PREPARE CardShock registry.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Cardiovascular Perfusionists Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Sep;100(3):319-327. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30327. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.30327
PMID:35830719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9539512/
Abstract

AIM

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a hemodynamically complex multisystem syndrome associated with persistently high morbidity and mortality. As CS is characterized by progressive failure to provide adequate systemic perfusion, supporting end-organ perfusion using mechanical circulatory support (MCS) seems intriguing. Since most patients with CS present in the catheterization laboratory, percutaneously implantable systems have the widest adoption in the field. We evaluated feasibility, outcomes, and complications after the introduction of a full-percutaneous program for both the Impella CP device and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO).

METHODS

PREPARE CardShock (PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock) is a prospective single-center registry, including 248 consecutive patients between May 2019 and April 2021, who underwent cardiac catheterization and displayed advanced cardiogenic shock. The median age was 70 (58-77) years and 28% were female. Sixty-five percent of the cases had cardiac arrest, of which 66% were out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A local standard operating procedure (SOP) indicating indications as well as relative and absolute contraindications for different means of MCS (Impella CP or VA-ECMO) was used to guide MCS use. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death and secondary endpoints were spontaneous myocardial infarction and major bleedings during the hospital stay.

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 50.4% with a median survival of 2 (0-6) days. Significant independent predictors of mortality were cardiac arrest during the index event (odds ratio [OR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.53 [1.43-4.51]; p = 0.001), age > 65 years (OR: 2.05 [1.03-4.09]; p = 0.036]), pH < 7.30 (OR: 2.69 [1.56-4.66]; p < 0.001), and lactate levels > 2 mmol/L (OR: 4.51 [2.37-8.65]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusive SOPs assist target-orientated MCS use in CS. This study provides guidance on the implementation, validation, and modification of newly established MCS programs to aid centers that are establishing such programs.

摘要

目的

心源性休克(CS)是一种与持续高发病率和死亡率相关的血流动力学复杂的多系统综合征。由于 CS 的特征是持续存在全身灌注不足,因此使用机械循环支持(MCS)来支持终末器官灌注似乎很有吸引力。由于大多数 CS 患者在导管室就诊,因此经皮植入系统在该领域的应用最为广泛。我们评估了在引入 Impella CP 装置和静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合器(VA-ECMO)的全经皮治疗方案后,该方案的可行性、结果和并发症。

方法

PREPARE CardShock(PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock)是一项前瞻性单中心注册研究,纳入了 2019 年 5 月至 2021 年 4 月期间 248 例连续接受心脏导管检查并显示晚期心源性休克的患者。中位年龄为 70 岁(58-77 岁),28%为女性。65%的病例有心律失常,其中 66%为院外心脏骤停。使用当地的标准操作程序(SOP),指示不同 MCS 方法(Impella CP 或 VA-ECMO)的适应证和相对及绝对禁忌证,以指导 MCS 的使用。主要终点为住院期间死亡,次要终点为住院期间发生自发性心肌梗死和大出血。

结果

总死亡率为 50.4%,中位生存时间为 2(0-6)天。死亡率的显著独立预测因素包括指数事件期间的心律失常(优势比[OR],95%置信区间[CI]:2.53[1.43-4.51];p=0.001)、年龄>65 岁(OR:2.05[1.03-4.09];p=0.036)、pH<7.30(OR:2.69[1.56-4.66];p<0.001)和乳酸水平>2mmol/L(OR:4.51[2.37-8.65];p<0.001)。

结论

明确的 SOP 有助于 CS 中以目标为导向的 MCS 使用。本研究为新建立的 MCS 方案的实施、验证和修改提供了指导,以帮助正在建立此类方案的中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f36/9539512/e44165541f06/CCD-100-319-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f36/9539512/e44165541f06/CCD-100-319-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f36/9539512/e44165541f06/CCD-100-319-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock-The PREPARE CardShock registry.前瞻性难治性心原性休克患者登记研究——PREPARE 心原性休克登记研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Sep;100(3):319-327. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30327. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Early Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Stabilizes and Potentially Rescues Patients in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.早期应用机械循环支持稳定并可能挽救难治性心源性休克患者。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;13(3):e005853. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005853. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
3
Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.机械循环支持在急性心肌梗死后心源性休克中的应用:Impella CP/5.0 与 ECMO 比较。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Mar;9(2):164-172. doi: 10.1177/2048872619865891. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
Left ventricular unloading via percutaneous assist device during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest.经皮辅助装置在体外膜肺氧合治疗急性心肌梗死合并心搏骤停中的左心室卸载作用。
Int J Artif Organs. 2024 Jun;47(6):401-410. doi: 10.1177/03913988241254978. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
5
Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.经皮心室辅助装置与静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的前瞻性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e012171. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012171.
6
Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.美国急性心肌梗死合并非梗死相关心原性休克患者应用机械循环支持治疗的趋势和院内死亡率。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Apr;107(4):287-303. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Comparison of Mortality Risk Models in Patients with Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock and Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support.心脏停搏后心原性休克与经皮机械循环支持患者死亡率风险模型比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Jan 18;2021:8843935. doi: 10.1155/2021/8843935. eCollection 2021.
8
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
9
Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克早期机械循环支持的可行性:底特律心源性休克倡议
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):454-461. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27427. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Results From the RESCUE Registry.心原性休克患者住院死亡率的临床特征和预测因素:RESCUE 登记研究结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;14(6):e008141. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008141. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the Timing of Mechanical Circulatory Support on the Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Subanalysis of the PREPARE CS Registry.机械循环支持时机对心肌梗死相关心源性休克结局的影响:PREPARE CS注册研究的亚组分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 8;13(6):1552. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061552.
2
Special Issue "Coronary Artery Disease Interventions".特刊“冠状动脉疾病干预措施”
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 31;13(3):817. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030817.
3
Outcomes of ECLS-SHOCK Eligibility Criteria Applied to a Real-World Cohort.应用于真实世界队列的体外膜肺氧合-休克(ECLS-SHOCK)入选标准的结果

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term mechanical circulatory support in elderly patients.老年患者的短期机械循环支持。
Artif Organs. 2022 May;46(5):867-877. doi: 10.1111/aor.14117. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
2
Temporal trends in patient characteristics, presumed causes, and outcomes following cardiogenic shock between 2005 and 2017: a Danish registry-based cohort study.2005 年至 2017 年期间心原性休克患者特征、推测病因和结局的时间趋势:一项丹麦基于登记的队列研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Dec 6;10(9):1074-1083. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab084.
3
Lingua Franca of Cardiogenic Shock: Speaking the Same Language.
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 8;12(22):6988. doi: 10.3390/jcm12226988.
4
Characteristics, Treatment Strategies and Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Contemporary Dutch Cohort.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的特征、治疗策略及预后:一项当代荷兰队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 10;12(16):5221. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165221.
心源性休克的通用语言:使用同一种语言交流
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 22;8:691232. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.691232. eCollection 2021.
4
Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Cardiac ICUs With Versus Without Shock Teams.心外 ICU 中是否设置休克团队对心源性休克的管理和预后的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Sep 28;78(13):1309-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.044.
5
Comparison of risk prediction models in infarct-related cardiogenic shock.梗死相关性心原性休克风险预测模型的比较。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Oct 27;10(8):890-897. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab054.
6
Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of mechanical circulatory support-related complications in patients with cardiogenic shock.心源牲休克患者机械循环支持相关并发症的发生率、预测因素和临床转归。
J Cardiol. 2022 Feb;79(2):163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
7
Unloading in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock After Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Acute Myocardial Infarction-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.急性心肌梗死致院外心脏骤停后难治性心源性休克中的血液滤过治疗——倾向评分匹配分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Aug 24;8:704312. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.704312. eCollection 2021.
8
Regional differences in presentation characteristics, use of treatments and outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock: Results from multicenter, international registry.心源性休克患者的临床表现特征、治疗方法应用和结局的地域差异:多中心、国际注册研究的结果。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2021 Sep;165(3):291-297. doi: 10.5507/bp.2021.046. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
9
Impact of Age on Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.年龄对心源性休克患者预后的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 23;8:688098. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.688098. eCollection 2021.
10
Effects of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.机械循环支持装置在急性心肌梗死患者支架植入术中的作用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e044072. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044072.