• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住房如何影响低收入社区的临终关怀和丧亲之痛?对英国丧亲者和服务提供者经历的定性研究。

How does housing affect end-of-life care and bereavement in low-income communities? A qualitative study of the experiences of bereaved individuals and service providers in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Hansford Lorraine, Thomas Felicity, Wyatt Katrina

机构信息

Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, University of Exeter, Queen's Drive, Exeter, EX4 4QH, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Jul 7;16:26323524221110248. doi: 10.1177/26323524221110248. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1177/26323524221110248
PMID:35832689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9272155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to affordable, appropriate housing is one of the key social determinants of health, affecting well-being across the lifecourse. However, beyond a recognition that housing quality is linked to place of death, little is known about the ways in which housing status impacts social, emotional, and practical aspects of dying and bereavement.

METHOD

The Checking Out project is a qualitative study aiming to explore the ways in which socio-economic status impacts people's experiences of, and attitudes towards, death, dying, and bereavement in the United Kingdom. Qualitative interviews were carried out with 14 bereaved individuals with experience of poverty at end of life or in bereavement, and 15 professionals supporting individuals in low-income communities. Interviews were conducted via phone/video call, and data include experiences of end of life and bereavement both before and during the pandemic. Transcripts were examined using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Housing emerged as an important factor affecting people's experiences, with 7 of the 14 bereaved individuals and all except 1 of the professionals discussing housing-related issues. Participants described ways in which unsuitable housing and housing insecurity impacted practical aspects of dying but also emotional and social well-being at end of life. Housing-related issues affected both patients and their families, though families found it difficult to air these concerns when their relative was dying.

CONCLUSION

The paper demonstrates how trusted professionals are able to advocate or address the issues faced by bereaved individuals and suggests implications for policy and practice. A greater awareness of the potential impact of housing status across public services, including healthcare practitioners, welfare support, and housing providers, could better support patients and practitioners to address these issues proactively. Housing providers and policy-makers should be included as key partners in collaborative public health approaches to palliative care.

摘要

背景

获得负担得起的合适住房是健康的关键社会决定因素之一,影响着整个生命历程中的幸福感。然而,除了认识到住房质量与死亡地点有关外,对于住房状况如何影响死亡和丧亲之痛的社会、情感和实际方面,人们知之甚少。

方法

“结账”项目是一项定性研究,旨在探讨社会经济地位如何影响英国人们对死亡、临终和丧亲之痛的体验及态度。对14名在生命末期或丧亲期间有贫困经历的丧亲者以及15名在低收入社区为个人提供支持的专业人员进行了定性访谈。访谈通过电话/视频通话进行,数据包括大流行之前和期间的临终和丧亲经历。使用主题分析法对访谈记录进行了检查。

结果

住房成为影响人们体验的一个重要因素,14名丧亲者中有7名以及除1名之外的所有专业人员都讨论了与住房相关的问题。参与者描述了不合适的住房和住房不安全如何影响临终的实际方面,以及生命末期的情感和社会幸福感。与住房相关的问题影响了患者及其家人,尽管家人发现当他们的亲人临终时很难表达这些担忧。

结论

本文展示了值得信赖的专业人员如何能够倡导或解决丧亲者面临的问题,并提出了对政策和实践的启示。提高包括医疗从业者、福利支持人员和住房提供者在内的公共服务部门对住房状况潜在影响的认识,可以更好地支持患者和从业者积极解决这些问题。住房提供者和政策制定者应作为姑息治疗协作公共卫生方法的关键合作伙伴被纳入其中。

相似文献

1
How does housing affect end-of-life care and bereavement in low-income communities? A qualitative study of the experiences of bereaved individuals and service providers in the United Kingdom.住房如何影响低收入社区的临终关怀和丧亲之痛?对英国丧亲者和服务提供者经历的定性研究。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Jul 7;16:26323524221110248. doi: 10.1177/26323524221110248. eCollection 2022.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
Thinking ahead about medical treatments in advanced illness: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in end-of-life care planning with patients and families from ethnically diverse backgrounds.预先思考晚期疾病的医疗治疗:对不同种族背景的终末期患者和家庭进行临终关怀规划的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(7):1-135. doi: 10.3310/JVFW4781.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
6
Social welfare needs of bereaved Australian carers: Implications of insights from palliative care and welfare workers.丧亲澳大利亚护理者的社会福利需求:来自姑息治疗和福利工作者的见解的启示。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):631-642. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13339. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
A qualitative study of recently bereaved people's beliefs about death: implications for bereavement care.一项关于新近丧亲者死亡观念的定性研究:对丧亲照护的启示
J Clin Nurs. 2014 May;23(9-10):1300-8. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12326. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
8
Qualitative evidence synthesis informing our understanding of people's perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication.定性证据综合分析有助于我们理解人们对定向数字通信的认知和体验。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 23;10(10):ED000141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000141.
9
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
10
The meaning and experience of bereavement support: A qualitative interview study of bereaved family caregivers.丧亲支持的意义和体验:一项对丧亲家庭照顾者的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Aug;16(4):396-405. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000475. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Grief, bereavement and prolonged grief disorder: scoping and mapping the evidence.悲伤、丧亲之痛与持续性悲伤障碍:证据的范围界定与梳理
BJPsych Open. 2025 Jul 11;11(4):e149. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10050.
2
Exploring perspectives regarding death cafés for people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative study.探索无家可归者对死亡咖啡馆的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 8;15(6):e096990. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096990.
3
Social determinants of where people die: A study of moderators and mediators using linked UK Census and mortality data.人们死亡地点的社会决定因素:一项使用英国人口普查与死亡率关联数据对调节因素和中介因素的研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Mar 21;30:101784. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101784. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Work-related grief and bereavement experiences of social and community service workers working with people experiencing social disadvantage: a rapid scoping review.与处于社会弱势地位的人群打交道的社会和社区服务工作者的工作相关悲伤和丧亲经历:一项快速范围审查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 29;24(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01668-8.
5
Risk factors for housing insecurity following bereavement: a cross-sectional analysis of UK survey respondents.丧偶后住房不安全的风险因素:对英国调查受访者的横断面分析
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Dec 16;18:26323524241306122. doi: 10.1177/26323524241306122. eCollection 2024.
6
Housing instability and psychological distress in African American cancer survivors: findings from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors study.非裔美国癌症幸存者的住房不稳定与心理困扰:底特律癌症幸存者研究的结果
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb;19(1):356-364. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01471-5. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
7
Reflecting on choices and responsibility in palliative care in the context of social disadvantage.反思社会弱势群体背景下姑息治疗中的选择与责任。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Aug 25;17:26323524231193037. doi: 10.1177/26323524231193037. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: bringing death back into life.《柳叶刀》死亡价值委员会报告:让死亡回归生命。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):837-884. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02314-X. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Primary care-based interventions to address the financial needs of patients experiencing poverty: a scoping review of the literature.基于初级保健的干预措施,以满足贫困患者的财务需求:文献综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Oct 7;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01546-8.
3
The impact of poverty and deprivation at the end of life: a critical review.贫困与临终时贫困状况的影响:一项批判性综述。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2021 Sep 12;15:26323524211033873. doi: 10.1177/26323524211033873. eCollection 2021.
4
COVID-19 Lessons: The Alignment of Palliative Medicine and Trauma-Informed Care.新冠疫情的经验教训:姑息医学与创伤知情护理的契合
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Aug;60(2):e26-e30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Disadvantaged and disenfranchised in bereavement: A scoping review of social and structural inequity following expected death.在丧亲之痛中处于劣势和被剥夺权利:对预期死亡后社会和结构不平等的范围综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Dec;242:112599. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112599. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
6
Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis.社会经济地位与生命终末期的医疗保健使用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 23;16(4):e1002782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002782. eCollection 2019 Apr.
7
Life expectancy gap between rich and poor in England widens.英国贫富之间的预期寿命差距正在扩大。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 28;364:l1492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1492.
8
"Just too busy living in the moment and surviving": barriers to accessing health care for structurally vulnerable populations at end-of-life.“只顾活在当下,勉强求生”:结构脆弱人群临终前获得医疗保健的障碍。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 26;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0396-7.
9
Palliative Curriculum Re-imagined: A Critical Evaluation of the UK Palliative Medicine Syllabus.重新构想的姑息治疗课程:对英国姑息医学教学大纲的批判性评估
Palliat Care. 2018 May 29;11:1178224218780375. doi: 10.1177/1178224218780375. eCollection 2018.
10
A moment for compassion: emerging rhetorics in end-of-life care.同情时刻:临终关怀中新兴的修辞学
Med Humanit. 2018 Jun;44(2):140-143. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011329. Epub 2018 Feb 10.