Crooks Jodie, Davis Gareth, Pattinson Mandy, Casey Emma, Shulman Caroline, Flemming Kate, Hudson Briony
Marie Curie, London, UK.
Pathway, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 8;15(6):e096990. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096990.
People experiencing homelessness (PEH) often die at a younger age than the general population. Advanced ill-health often occurs late in its trajectory (if at all), leaving many PEH to die without adequate support from hospital-based, hospice-based or community-based palliative care services. Despite the high rate of bereavement and exposure to death among PEH, there are rarely opportunities for them to reflect on their experiences, thoughts and preferences around death or receive bereavement support. Death cafés are a global social franchise, providing a space for people to participate in an open group discussion about death, dying and bereavement. They are free to attend and unstructured but facilitated.
To explore the perspectives of PEH and the professionals that support them with regards to the potential acceptability, benefits and challenges of death cafes.
A qualitative study comprising of interviews with nine homelessness and/or palliative care professionals with experience of running death cafés for, or supporting PEH in other ways, and two focus groups with nine people with lived experience of homelessness. The research was co-produced with a lived experience co-researcher forming a core part of the research team. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised to develop themes.
Five themes were developed to highlight the perspectives and experiences of death cafés for PEH: choice; expertise in facilitation: recognising risk and the unstructured nature; promoting safety against potential risk; potential benefits and potential practical considerations. Themes highlight the need for a trauma-informed approach. Death cafés could be impactful, where done well, but they are not without risk.
Death cafés for PEH pose risks that require comprehensive consideration and trauma-informed, expert facilitation. However, this research highlighted that a low-pressure space to explore thoughts around death, dying and bereavement is currently an unmet need within this population.
无家可归者通常比普通人群更早离世。严重的健康问题往往在病程后期才出现(即便出现),导致许多无家可归者在离世时未得到医院、临终关怀机构或社区姑息治疗服务的充分支持。尽管无家可归者中丧亲率高且常接触死亡,但他们很少有机会反思自己对死亡的经历、想法和偏好,也很少能获得丧亲支持。死亡咖啡馆是一项全球性的社会活动,为人们提供一个空间,参与关于死亡、临终和丧亲的公开小组讨论。参加活动免费且形式自由,但有主持人引导。
探讨无家可归者及其支持他们的专业人员对死亡咖啡馆的潜在可接受性、益处和挑战的看法。
一项定性研究,包括对九名有经营面向无家可归者的死亡咖啡馆经验或以其他方式支持无家可归者的无家可归和/或姑息治疗专业人员进行访谈,以及对九个有过无家可归经历的人进行两个焦点小组访谈。该研究是与一名有实际经验的共同研究者共同开展的,该研究者是研究团队的核心成员。采用反思性主题分析法来提炼主题。
提炼出五个主题,以突出无家可归者对死亡咖啡馆的看法和经历:选择;引导专业知识:认识风险和非结构化性质;防范潜在风险促进安全;潜在益处和潜在实际考量。主题突出了采用创伤知情方法的必要性。死亡咖啡馆如果运作良好可能会有成效,但并非没有风险。
为无家可归者设立的死亡咖啡馆存在风险,需要全面考虑并由具备创伤知情知识的专家引导。然而,本研究强调,目前在这一人群中,一个能让人们在低压力环境下探讨死亡、临终和丧亲想法的空间尚未得到满足。