Hu Ting, Wang Xinyu, Xu Haiming
School of English Studies, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.
Zhejiang Conservatory of Music, Hangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 27;13:872247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872247. eCollection 2022.
It has been four decades since eye-tracking was first used in interpreting studies, and recent years has witnessed a growing interest in the application of this method, which holds great potential for offering a look into the "black box" of interpreting processing. However, little attention has been paid to comprehensively illustrating what has been done, what can be done, and what needs to be done with this method in this discipline. With this in view, this paper sets out to understand contributions of previous studies-key themes discussed, eye-tracking measures used, their limitations and implications, and future directions. To this end, we conduct a review of a total of 26 empirical papers from peer-reviewed journals within a time span of 4 decades ranging from 1981 to 2021. This study, as the first attempt of its kind at a comprehensive review on using eye-tracking in interpreting studies, should have implications for researchers, educators, and practitioners.
自眼动追踪首次用于口译研究以来,已经过去了四十年。近年来,人们对这种方法的应用兴趣日益浓厚,它在深入探究口译过程的“黑匣子”方面具有巨大潜力。然而,在这一学科中,对于全面阐述使用这种方法已经做了什么、可以做什么以及需要做什么,却很少有人关注。鉴于此,本文旨在了解以往研究的贡献——所讨论的关键主题、所使用的眼动追踪测量方法、它们的局限性和启示以及未来方向。为此,我们对1981年至2021年这四十年间同行评审期刊上的26篇实证论文进行了综述。作为首次对在口译研究中使用眼动追踪进行全面综述的此类尝试,本研究应对研究人员、教育工作者和从业者有所启示。