From the National Institutes of Health (N.F.S.), Bethesda, MD; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.E.C.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA.
Neurology. 2023 Feb 28;100(9):430-436. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201571. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) viral pandemic dramatically affected human health, health care delivery, health care workers, and health care research worldwide. The field of academic neurology was no exception. In this 2022 Presidential Plenary, we discuss the challenges faced by neurologists and neuroscientists professionally and personally. We review the threats posed by the pandemic to neuroscience research activities, materials, productivity, and funding. We then discuss the impact of the pandemic on clinical trials for neurologic diseases. Restrictions to patient enrolment due to limited in-person access to laboratory testing, imaging, and study visits led to delay in both clinical trial enrolment and study completion but also to innovative new means to engage clinical trial participants remotely and to strategies to critically appraise the frequency and design of trial-related patient evaluations. Clinical care was also challenged by initial pandemic prioritization of urgent visit and inpatient care and the rapid pivot to telehealth for most other neurology care encounters. Front-line neurology care teams faced their fears of infection, with the first few months of the pandemic being characterized by uncertainty, inconsistent national health care strategies, limited personal protective equipment, and an alarming rate of human illness and death caused by COVID-19. The personal and societal toll of the pandemic is incalculable. Across research and clinical neurology providers, women and particularly those with young families juggled the impossible balance of career and family care as schools closed and children required home-based education. Shining through this dark time are lessons that should shape a brighter future for our field. We are resilient, and the advances in neuroscience and neurology care continue to advance improved neurologic outcomes. The National Institutes of Health devised multiple support strategies for researchers to help bridge the pandemic. Telehealth, clinical trial designs that are more participant-centric with remote monitoring, and flexible work schedules are strategies to rebalance overworked lives and improve our engagement with our patients. As we re-emerge, we have the chance to reframe our field.
SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)病毒大流行对全球人类健康、医疗保健服务、医护人员和医疗保健研究产生了巨大影响。学术神经学领域也不例外。在本次 2022 年主席全体会议上,我们讨论了神经科医生和神经科学家在专业和个人方面面临的挑战。我们回顾了大流行对神经科学研究活动、材料、生产力和资金带来的威胁。接着,我们讨论了大流行对神经疾病临床试验的影响。由于实验室检测、影像学检查和研究访视的现场访问受限,导致患者入组受限,临床试验的入组和完成都出现延迟,但也出现了创新的远程参与临床试验的新方法,以及批判性评估与试验相关的患者评估频率和设计的策略。临床护理也受到了大流行的挑战,最初的大流行优先考虑紧急就诊和住院护理,并且大多数其他神经内科就诊都迅速转向远程医疗。一线神经内科护理团队面临着感染的恐惧,大流行的头几个月的特点是不确定性、国家卫生保健策略不一致、个人防护设备有限,以及 COVID-19 导致的惊人的人类疾病和死亡率。大流行给个人和社会带来的损失是无法估量的。在研究和临床神经科医生中,女性,特别是那些有年幼子女的女性,既要平衡职业和家庭护理,又要应对学校关闭和子女需要在家接受教育的问题,这是不可能完成的任务。在这个黑暗的时期,有一些教训应该为我们的领域塑造更美好的未来。我们具有韧性,神经科学和神经内科护理的进步继续推动着改善神经系统疾病预后。美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)为研究人员设计了多种支持策略,以帮助克服大流行。远程医疗、更以患者为中心并带有远程监测的临床试验设计以及灵活的工作时间表,是重新平衡过度劳累的生活和改善我们与患者接触的策略。当我们重新出现时,我们有机会重新构建我们的领域。