• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

间接粘结修复对根管治疗后牙齿临床预后的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The influence of indirect bonded restorations on clinical prognosis of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.

Department of Surgical Sciences, Dental School, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2022 Aug;38(8):e203-e219. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.018. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.018
PMID:35835608
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The loss of the dental coronal portion following carious lesions or fractures leads to endodontic treatment with subsequent restoration to ensure correct anatomy and function. Recently, partial adhesive restorations have been widely proposed to increase the survival rate of endodontically treated teeth. The primary purpose of this review is to assess the failure rate of indirect partial adhesive restorations on endodontically treated teeth (ETT), considering the follow-up period.

METHODS

The indications reported in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) were used to draft the present review. The study was constructed on PICO questions: population (patients who need indirect adhesive restorative treatment on endodontically treated teeth with onlay and overlay), intervention (onlay and overlay), control (patients with onlay and overlay on endodontically treated teeth) and outcome (failure rate and types of failure for onlay and overlay). The asked scientific question was: what are the failure rate and types of failure for adhesive indirect partial restorations on ETT?

RESULTS

The overall failure rate that emerges is 0.087 with a ratio of 121/1254, I 80 % p-value< 0.001. Moreover, by meta-regression with covariates the follow-up period reports a coefficient of 0.013 with a P-value< 0.001. In conclusion, the indirect partial restorations on endodontically treated teeth displayed overall acceptable outcomes in terms of success from 2 to 4 years after their placement with only 4.32 % of failure. Failures increase after 7 years up to 12-30 years with failure rates of approximatively 10.65 % and 20.94 %. The analysis of the included articles reporting the causes of restorations failures showed that 15.51 % of cases were related to the loss of dental element.

SIGNIFICANCE

Besides the survival rates of indirect adhesive restorations on endodontically treated posterior teeth, it was highlighted that the majority of failures appeared restorable. Thus, partial restorations seemed able to prevent the ETT tooth loss.

摘要

目的

龋病或外伤导致牙冠部分缺失,需进行根管治疗,随后进行修复,以确保正确的解剖结构和功能。最近,广泛提出了部分黏接修复,以提高根管治疗后的牙齿的存活率。本综述的主要目的是评估在根管治疗后的牙齿(ETT)上进行间接部分黏接修复的失败率,同时考虑随访时间。

方法

本综述使用 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)报告的指标进行起草。该研究构建于 PICO 问题之上:人群(需要对根管治疗后的牙齿进行间接黏接修复治疗的患者,包括嵌体和高嵌体)、干预(嵌体和高嵌体)、对照(根管治疗后的牙齿进行嵌体和高嵌体的患者)和结局(嵌体和高嵌体的失败率和失败类型)。所提出的科学问题是:在 ETT 上进行黏接间接部分修复的失败率和失败类型是什么?

结果

总体失败率为 0.087,比率为 121/1254,I 80 % p 值<0.001。此外,通过具有协变量的元回归,随访时间报告的系数为 0.013,P 值<0.001。总之,间接部分修复在 ETT 上的放置后 2 至 4 年内总体上显示出可接受的结果,只有 4.32 %的失败率。在 7 年后,失败率增加到 12-30 年,失败率约为 10.65 %和 20.94 %。对报告修复失败原因的文章进行分析后显示,15.51 %的病例与牙体丧失有关。

意义

除了根管治疗后的后牙间接黏接修复的存活率外,还强调了大多数失败是可修复的。因此,部分修复似乎能够防止 ETT 牙齿丧失。

相似文献

1
The influence of indirect bonded restorations on clinical prognosis of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.间接粘结修复对根管治疗后牙齿临床预后的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dent Mater. 2022 Aug;38(8):e203-e219. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.018. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
2
Clinical outcome of bonded partial indirect posterior restorations on vital and non-vital teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.活髓牙和非活髓牙的粘结性部分间接后牙修复体的临床效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6597-6621. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04187-x. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
3
Clinical behavior and survival of CAD-CAM resin nanoceramic and polymer interpenetrating ceramic network material restorations on endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.CAD-CAM树脂纳米陶瓷和聚合物互穿陶瓷网络材料修复根管治疗后牙齿的临床行为与生存率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jun;133(6):1437.e1-1437.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.019. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
4
Clinical performance of direct composite resin versus indirect restorations on endodontically treated posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直接复合树脂与间接修复体用于根管治疗后磨牙的临床性能:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Sep;130(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
5
Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.直接复合树脂充填与银汞合金充填用于永久性后牙。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 13;8(8):CD005620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005620.pub3.
6
Comparing survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored either with glass-fiber-reinforced or metal posts: A systematic review and meta-analyses.比较用玻璃纤维增强或金属桩修复的根管治疗牙的存活率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Apr;131(4):567-578. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
7
Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.树脂基直接后牙修复体与玻璃离子修复体的临床疗效——临床结局参数的最新荟萃分析
Dent Mater. 2022 May;38(5):e109-e135. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.018. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
8
Is a fiber post better than a metal post for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis.纤维桩和金属桩修复根管治疗后的牙齿,哪种更好?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2021 Sep;112:103750. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103750. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
9
Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?哪些机械和物理测试方法与预测陶瓷基牙科修复体的临床性能相关?
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:218-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01460.x.
10
A systematic review of single crowns on endodontically treated teeth.牙髓治疗后牙齿单冠修复的系统评价。
J Dent. 2007 Oct;35(10):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.004. Epub 2007 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Two-year clinical performance of indirect resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth with different cavity preparation designs: a randomized clinical trial.两种不同牙体预备设计在根管治疗后牙间接树脂复合修复体的两年临床效果:一项随机临床试验
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04725-5.
2
Interdisciplinary Delphi study by PROSEC North America: Recommendations on single indirect restorations made from ceramic and nonmetallic biomaterials for posterior teeth.北美PROSEC开展的跨学科德尔菲研究:关于后牙陶瓷和非金属生物材料制成的单一间接修复体的建议
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Mar;37(3):809-820. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13289. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
3
Fracture Resistance of Direct versus Indirect Restorations on Posterior Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
后牙直接修复与间接修复的抗折性:系统评价与Meta分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 24;11(6):536. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060536.
4
Effect of preheating on the viscosity of composite resins.预热对复合树脂粘度的影响。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):360-365. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_75_23. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
5
The influence of Zircos-E® etchant, silica coating, and alumina air-particle abrasion on the debonding resistance of endocrowns with three different preparation designs.Zircos-E® 蚀刻剂、二氧化硅涂层和氧化铝喷砂对三种不同制备设计的嵌体的抗脱落性能的影响。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Jun;10(3):e901. doi: 10.1002/cre2.901.
6
[Four-year follow-up study of onlay and occlusal veneer restorations on posterior teeth].[后牙高嵌体和咬合面贴面修复的四年随访研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Feb 18;56(1):88-92. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.01.014.
7
Outcome of chairside CAD/CAM ceramic restorations on endodontically treated posterior teeth: a prospective study.CAD/CAM 椅旁陶瓷修复体在后牙牙髓治疗后的疗效:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03812-3.