Institute of Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 14;23(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01779-8.
Mental disorders such as depression and anxiety are common during pregnancy and postpartum, but are frequently underdiagnosed and untreated. In the last decades, internet-based interventions have emerged as a treatment alternative showing similar effectiveness to face-to-face psychotherapy. We aimed to explore midwives' perceptions of the acceptability of internet-based interventions for the treatment of perinatal depression and anxiety symptoms.
In this ethnographic qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 midwives. We followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist (COREQ). Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using framework analysis. The identified framework categories were rated individually by two independent raters. Krippendorff's alpha coefficient was used to ensure the reliability of the rating.
Four main themes emerged: midwives' experience with patients' mental health issues; the role of healthcare workers in women's utilisation of internet-based interventions in the perinatal period; the overall perception of internet-based interventions; and recommendation of internet-based interventions to perinatal women. Twenty-five of the 30 participants viewed internet-based interventions as an acceptable type of intervention, which they would recommend to a subgroup of patients (e.g. women who are well-educated or younger). All except for two midwives identified themselves and medical doctors as key figures regarding patients' utilisation of internet-based interventions, although a third of the interviewees highlighted that they needed sufficient information about such interventions. Finally, several participants suggested features which could be relevant to develop more acceptable and feasible internet-based interventions in the future.
Participants' overall perception of internet-based interventions for perinatal depression and anxiety symptoms was positive. This study underlines the importance of considering midwives' views about internet-based interventions for perinatal mental health care. Our findings have implications for the practice not only of midwives but also of other maternity care professionals. Future studies examining the views of other health professionals are warranted.
抑郁症和焦虑症等精神障碍在妊娠和产后期间很常见,但常常被漏诊和未得到治疗。在过去几十年中,基于互联网的干预措施已作为一种治疗选择出现,其疗效与面对面心理疗法相似。我们旨在探讨助产士对基于互联网的干预措施治疗围产期抑郁和焦虑症状的可接受性的看法。
在这项人种学定性研究中,对 30 名助产士进行了半结构化访谈。我们遵循了定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ)清单。对录音的访谈进行了逐字转录,并使用框架分析进行了分析。确定的框架类别由两名独立的评估员分别进行评估。使用 Krippendorff 的 alpha 系数来确保评分的可靠性。
出现了四个主要主题:助产士对患者心理健康问题的经验;医疗保健工作者在女性在围产期使用基于互联网的干预措施中的作用;对基于互联网的干预措施的总体看法;以及向围产期妇女推荐基于互联网的干预措施。30 名参与者中有 25 名认为基于互联网的干预措施是一种可接受的干预类型,他们将向一部分患者(例如受过良好教育或较年轻的女性)推荐这种干预措施。除了两名助产士之外,所有助产士都认为自己和医生是患者使用基于互联网的干预措施的关键人物,尽管三分之一的受访者强调他们需要有关此类干预措施的足够信息。最后,一些参与者提出了一些可能与未来开发更能被接受和更可行的基于互联网的干预措施相关的特征。
参与者对基于互联网的干预措施治疗围产期抑郁和焦虑症状的总体看法是积极的。这项研究强调了考虑助产士对围产期心理健康护理的基于互联网的干预措施的看法的重要性。我们的研究结果不仅对助产士,而且对其他产科保健专业人员的实践具有重要意义。未来需要研究其他卫生专业人员的观点。