• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科急诊科医护人员与患儿照顾者之间的沟通差距

Communication Gaps Between Providers and Caregivers of Patients in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

作者信息

Dorsey Bridget F, Kamimura Akiko, Cook Lawrence J, Kadish Howard A, Cook Heather K, Kang Ashley, Nguyen Jacqueline B T, Holsti Maija

机构信息

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2022 Jul 6;9:23743735221112223. doi: 10.1177/23743735221112223. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1177/23743735221112223
PMID:35836779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9274403/
Abstract

Communication gaps between the healthcare team and caregivers of pediatric patients can result in negative consequences. This study aims to identify specific words and phrases used in a pediatric emergency department (ED) that are unclear or confusing to caregivers. Research assistants at the Primary Children's Hospital recorded caregivers' responses to the question, " Across all steps in the care process, 62 of 220 participants (28.2%) reported unclear words and phrases used by the healthcare team. Responses recorded after the discharge step had the highest proportion of communication problems, followed by the initial evaluation and then the update step ( [2,  = 220] = 6.30,  = .043). Themes among responses included ED logistics, signs/symptoms, the diagnostic process, treatment/procedures, general confusion, and language barriers. These results provide feedback to pediatric emergency medicine providers about potential communication gaps and point to a need for further efforts to train providers in the practice of high-quality communication.

摘要

医疗团队与儿科患者护理人员之间的沟通差距可能会导致负面后果。本研究旨在识别儿科急诊科(ED)中使用的、护理人员不清楚或感到困惑的特定词汇和短语。 Primary儿童医院的研究助理记录了护理人员对“在护理过程的所有步骤中,220名参与者中有62名(28.2%)报告称医疗团队使用的词汇和短语不清楚”这一问题的回答。出院步骤后记录的回答中沟通问题的比例最高,其次是初始评估,然后是更新步骤([2,=220]=6.30,=0.043)。回答中的主题包括急诊科后勤、体征/症状、诊断过程、治疗/程序、普遍困惑和语言障碍。这些结果为儿科急诊医学提供者提供了关于潜在沟通差距的反馈,并指出需要进一步努力培训提供者进行高质量沟通的实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9274403/826cc6851660/10.1177_23743735221112223-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9274403/826cc6851660/10.1177_23743735221112223-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/9274403/826cc6851660/10.1177_23743735221112223-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Communication Gaps Between Providers and Caregivers of Patients in a Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科医护人员与患儿照顾者之间的沟通差距
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jul 6;9:23743735221112223. doi: 10.1177/23743735221112223. eCollection 2022.
2
Co-designing discharge communication interventions for mental health visits to the pediatric emergency department: a mixed-methods study.共同设计针对儿科急诊科心理健康就诊的出院沟通干预措施:一项混合方法研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 21;10(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00594-y.
3
Spanish-Speaking Caregivers' Experience with an Emergency Department Pediatric Asthma-Care Bundle Quality Initiative.西班牙语为母语的照护者对急诊儿科哮喘护理套餐质量改善计划的体验。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Aug;6(4):660-667. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00564-1. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
4
Health Care Provider Bias in Estimating the Health Literacy of Caregivers in a Pediatric Emergency Department.医疗机构在评估儿科急诊护理人员健康素养时存在的偏见。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Dec 1;39(12):e80-e85. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003076.
5
Barriers to Effective Teamwork Relating to Pediatric Resuscitations: Perceptions of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Staff.与儿科复苏相关的有效团队合作障碍:儿科急诊医学工作人员的看法。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Mar;36(3):e146-e150. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001275.
6
Unmet Needs at the Time of Emergency Department Discharge.急诊科出院时未满足的需求。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):279-87. doi: 10.1111/acem.12877. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Nurse-Caregiver Communication of Hospital-To-Home Transition Information at a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital in Western Australia: A Multi-Stage Qualitative Descriptive Study.澳大利亚西部一家三级儿科医院护士-照护者在医院-家庭过渡信息沟通:多阶段定性描述研究。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Sep-Oct;60:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.02.017. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
8
Improving the quality of communication during handover in a Paediatric Emergency Department: a qualitative pilot study.提高儿科急诊科交接班期间的沟通质量:一项定性试点研究。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2019 Sep 30;60(3):E219-E225. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.3.1042. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Healthcare Providers' Experiences with Gaps, Barriers, and Facilitators Faced by Family Caregivers of Children with Respiratory Diseases.医疗保健提供者在应对儿童呼吸道疾病患者家庭照护者面临的差距、障碍和促进因素方面的经验。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 May-Jun;52:49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
10
Patients' and caregivers' beliefs about depression screening and referral in the emergency department.患者及护理人员对急诊科抑郁症筛查与转诊的看法。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Nov;25(11):721-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181bec8f2.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication challenges and experiences between parents and providers in South Korean paediatric emergency departments: a qualitative study to define AI-assisted communication agents.韩国儿科急诊科家长与医护人员之间的沟通挑战与经历:一项定义人工智能辅助沟通工具的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 3;15(4):e094748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094748.
2
A trial of a chat service for patients and their family members in an emergency department.一项针对急诊科患者及其家属的聊天服务的试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11414-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use and Impact of Professional Interpretation in a Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊中专业口译的使用和影响。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Nov-Dec;19(8):956-962. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Use and Effectiveness of the Teach-Back Method in Patient Education and Health Outcomes.反馈教学法在患者教育及健康结局中的应用与效果
Fed Pract. 2019 Jun;36(6):284-289.
3
A decade of studying implicit racial/ethnic bias in healthcare providers using the implicit association test.十年来,研究人员一直使用内隐联想测验(IAT)来研究医疗服务提供者中隐含的种族/民族偏见。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;199:219-229. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Language Matters: Race, Trust, and Outcomes in the Pediatric Emergency Department.语言至关重要:儿科急诊科中的种族、信任与治疗结果
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Apr;32(4):222-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000453.
5
Optimizing patient/caregiver satisfaction through quality of communication in the pediatric emergency department.通过改善儿科急诊科的沟通质量来优化患者/护理人员满意度。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Nov;27(11):1016-21. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318235be06.
6
Do patients understand?患者明白吗?
Perm J. 2008 Summer;12(3):67-9. doi: 10.7812/TPP/07-144.
7
Randomized, controlled trials of interventions to improve communication in intensive care: a systematic review.随机对照试验干预措施改善重症监护中的沟通:系统评价。
Chest. 2011 Mar;139(3):543-554. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0595. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
8
Patients' perceptions of screening for health literacy: reactions to the newest vital sign.患者对健康素养筛查的看法:对最新生命体征的反应。
J Health Commun. 2010 Jun;15(4):402-12. doi: 10.1080/10810731003753117.
9
Short Assessment of Health Literacy-Spanish and English: a comparable test of health literacy for Spanish and English speakers.简短健康素养评估-西班牙语和英语版:西班牙语和英语使用者健康素养的可比测试。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug;45(4):1105-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01119.x. Epub 2010 May 24.
10
Patient comprehension of emergency department care and instructions: are patients aware of when they do not understand?患者对急诊科护理及医嘱的理解:患者是否意识到自己何时不理解?
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):454-461.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.016. Epub 2008 Jul 10.