Department & Institute of Psychiatry, Hospital das Clínicas Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022 Nov;146(5):442-455. doi: 10.1111/acps.13474. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
There is limited information on the characteristics of older adults with bipolar disorder (OABD) treated with lithium, along with safety concerns about its use by older adults. The aim of the present study is to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of OABD receiving lithium therapy, using data from the Global Ageing & Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder (GAGE-BD).
Cross-sectional analysis of the GAGE-BD dataset to determine differences and similarities between lithium users and non-users. We analysed data from 986 participants aged 50 years or older (mean age 63.5 years; 57.5% females) from 12 study sites. Two subgroups ('Lithium'; 'Non-lithium') were defined according to the current prescription of lithium. We compared several outcomes between these groups, controlling for age, gender, and study site.
OABD treated with lithium had lower scores on depression rating scales and were less likely to be categorised as with moderate or severe depression. There was a lower proportion of lithium users than non-users among those with evidence of rapid cycling and non-bipolar psychiatric diagnoses. Assessment of global cognitive state and functionality indicated better performance among lithium users. The current use of antipsychotics was less frequent among lithium users, who also reported fewer cardiovascular comorbidities than non-users.
We found several potentially relevant differences in the clinical profile of OABD treated with lithium compared with those treated with other mood stabilisers. However, the interpretation of the present results must take into account the methodological limitations inherent to the cross-sectional approach and data harmonisation.
关于接受锂治疗的老年双相情感障碍患者(OABD)的特征,相关信息有限,并且对于老年人使用锂还存在安全性方面的担忧。本研究的目的是使用来自全球老年及双相情感障碍实验(GAGE-BD)的数据,描述接受锂治疗的 OABD 的人口统计学和临床特征。
对 GAGE-BD 数据集进行横断面分析,以确定锂使用者和非使用者之间的差异和相似之处。我们分析了来自 12 个研究地点的 986 名 50 岁或以上(平均年龄 63.5 岁;57.5%为女性)参与者的数据。根据当前锂的处方,将数据分为两个亚组(“锂”;“非锂”)。我们控制了年龄、性别和研究地点,比较了这两个亚组之间的几个结果。
接受锂治疗的 OABD 在抑郁评定量表上的评分较低,且更不可能被归类为中度或重度抑郁。在有快速循环和非双相精神科诊断证据的患者中,锂使用者的比例低于非使用者。对整体认知状态和功能的评估表明,锂使用者的表现更好。锂使用者使用抗精神病药物的比例较低,且报告的心血管合并症也少于非使用者。
与接受其他心境稳定剂治疗的 OABD 相比,我们发现接受锂治疗的 OABD 的临床特征存在一些潜在的差异。然而,必须考虑到横断面方法和数据协调固有的方法学限制,来解释目前的结果。