Pang Jonathan C, Vasudev Milind, Du Amy T, Nottoli Madeline M, Dang Katherine, Kuan Edward C
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2023 Apr;133(4):722-731. doi: 10.1002/lary.30306. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
Topical intranasal anticholinergics are commonly prescribed for the relief of chronic rhinitis and associated symptoms, warranting thorough assessment of the supporting evidence. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticholinergic nasal sprays in the management of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis symptom severity and duration.
A search encompassing the Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus databases was conducted. Primary studies describing rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and/or postnasal drip outcomes in rhinitis patients treated with an anticholinergic spray were included for review.
The search yielded 1,029 unique abstracts, of which 12 studies (n = 2,024) met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis and 9 (n = 1,920) for meta-analysis. Median follow-up was 4 weeks and ipratropium bromide was the most extensively trialed anticholinergic. Compared to placebo, anticholinergic treatment was demonstrated to significantly reduce rhinorrhea severity scores (standardized mean difference [95% CI] = -0.77 [-1.20, -0.35]; -0.43 [-0.72, -0.13]) and duration (-0.62 [-0.95, -0.30]; -0.29 [-0.47, -0.10]) in allergic and non-allergic rhinitis patients respectively. Benefit was less consistent for nasal congestion, postnasal drip, and sneezing symptoms. Reported adverse effects included nasal mucosa dryness or irritation, epistaxis, headaches, and pharyngitis, though comparison to placebo found significantly greater risk for epistaxis only (risk ratio [95% CI] = 2.19 [1.22, 3.93]).
Albeit treating other symptoms with less benefit, anticholinergic nasal sprays appear to be safe and efficacious in reducing rhinorrhea severity and duration in both rhinitis etiologies. This evidence supports their continued use in the treatment of rhinitis-associated rhinorrhea.
1 Laryngoscope, 133:722-731, 2023.
鼻用局部抗胆碱能药物常用于缓解慢性鼻炎及相关症状,因此有必要对相关证据进行全面评估。本研究旨在评估抗胆碱能鼻喷雾剂在治疗变应性和非变应性鼻炎症状严重程度及持续时间方面的安全性和有效性。
检索了Cochrane图书馆、PubMed/MEDLINE和Scopus数据库。纳入描述用抗胆碱能喷雾剂治疗的鼻炎患者鼻漏、鼻塞和/或鼻后滴漏结果的初步研究进行综述。
检索得到1029篇独特的摘要,其中12项研究(n = 2024)符合定性综合分析的纳入标准,9项研究(n = 1920)符合荟萃分析的纳入标准。中位随访时间为4周,异丙托溴铵是试验最广泛的抗胆碱能药物。与安慰剂相比,抗胆碱能治疗在变应性和非变应性鼻炎患者中分别显著降低了鼻漏严重程度评分(标准化均数差[95%CI]=-0.77[-1.20,-0.35];-0.43[-0.72,-0.13])和持续时间(-0.62[-0.95,-0.30];-0.29[-0.47,-0.10])。对于鼻塞、鼻后滴漏和打喷嚏症状,获益不太一致。报告的不良反应包括鼻黏膜干燥或刺激、鼻出血、头痛和咽炎,不过与安慰剂相比,仅鼻出血的风险显著更高(风险比[95%CI]=2.19[1.22,3.93])。
尽管抗胆碱能鼻喷雾剂对其他症状的治疗获益较少,但在减轻两种鼻炎病因的鼻漏严重程度和持续时间方面似乎是安全有效的。这一证据支持其继续用于治疗与鼻炎相关的鼻漏。
1 《喉镜》,2023年,第133卷,第722 - 731页