D'Souza Ryan S, Barman Ross A, Schappell Justin B, Hagedorn Jonathan M
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USA.
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):206-214. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
Fibromyalgia is a prevalent disorder manifesting with widespread musculoskeletal pain and central sensitization, as well as fatigue, sleep issues, psychologic distress, and poor quality of life. Patients with fibromyalgia also may be diagnosed with other painful conditions amenable to treatment with spinal cord stimulation (SCS), although it is unclear how these patients respond to SCS compared with patients without fibromyalgia.
We performed an 11-year, multicenter, retrospective matched cohort study comparing SCS-treated patients with fibromyalgia and those without fibromyalgia. The primary outcome was comparison in mean calculated percentage pain relief between cohorts at six months after SCS implantation. Secondary outcomes included comparison of patient satisfaction between six and 12 months after SCS implantation, and percentage of patients reporting opioid intake and neuropathic medication intake at six months and 12 months after SCS implantation. Adjusted regression analysis was performed to make comparisons while adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative opioid intake, and preoperative neuropathic medication intake.
Of 90 patients with fibromyalgia who underwent SCS trial, 18 patients (20%) failed their SCS trial and did not proceed toward implantation. Sixty-eight patients with fibromyalgia were matched to 141 patients in the control cohort based on age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score. At six months after SCS implantation, there was no statistical difference in calculated percentage change in pain intensity between the fibromyalgia cohort (46.6 ± 29.0) and the control cohort (50.9 ± 32.8; β, -18.4; 95% CI, -44.3 to 7.6; p = 0.157). At baseline, a greater percentage of patients in the fibromyalgia cohort reported preoperative opioid intake (51.5% vs 22.7%, p < 0.001) and preoperative neuropathic medication intake (67.6% vs 15.6%, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference between cohorts in the percentage of patients taking opioid or neuropathic medications at six months and 12 months after SCS implantation. Similarly, there was no difference between cohorts in the percentage of patients reporting satisfaction between six and 12 months.
Patients with fibromyalgia who received a diagnosis approved for treatment with SCS may expect similar post-SCS-implantation pain relief, overall satisfaction, and analgesic use rate to those of patients without fibromyalgia.
纤维肌痛是一种常见疾病,表现为广泛的肌肉骨骼疼痛和中枢敏化,以及疲劳、睡眠问题、心理困扰和生活质量差。纤维肌痛患者也可能被诊断出患有其他适合脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗的疼痛性疾病,尽管与无纤维肌痛的患者相比,这些患者对SCS的反应尚不清楚。
我们进行了一项为期11年的多中心回顾性匹配队列研究,比较接受SCS治疗的纤维肌痛患者和无纤维肌痛患者。主要结局是比较SCS植入后6个月时各队列中计算得出的平均疼痛缓解百分比。次要结局包括比较SCS植入后6至12个月时患者的满意度,以及报告在SCS植入后6个月和12个月时服用阿片类药物和神经性药物的患者百分比。进行了调整回归分析以在调整年龄、性别、体重指数、Charlson合并症指数、术前阿片类药物摄入量和术前神经性药物摄入量后进行比较。
在90例接受SCS试验的纤维肌痛患者中,18例(20%)SCS试验失败,未进行植入。根据年龄、性别、Charlson合并症指数和美国麻醉医师协会身体状况评分,将68例纤维肌痛患者与141例对照队列中的患者进行匹配。在SCS植入后6个月时,纤维肌痛队列(46.6±29.0)和对照队列(50.9±32.8;β,-18.4;95%CI,-44.3至7.6;p=0.157)之间计算得出的疼痛强度百分比变化无统计学差异。在基线时,纤维肌痛队列中报告术前服用阿片类药物(51.5%对22.7%,p<0.001)和术前服用神经性药物(67.6%对15.6%,p<0.001)的患者比例更高。然而,在SCS植入后6个月和12个月时,各队列中服用阿片类药物或神经性药物的患者百分比无差异。同样,在6至12个月时报告满意的患者百分比在各队列之间也无差异。
被诊断为适合SCS治疗的纤维肌痛患者,其SCS植入后的疼痛缓解、总体满意度和镇痛使用率可能与无纤维肌痛的患者相似。