Suppr超能文献

国际、多学科、跨学科研究护理、助产学和相关健康专业学生的疼痛知识和态度。

International, multi-disciplinary, cross-section study of pain knowledge and attitudes in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions students.

机构信息

Teesside University, Middlesbrough, England.

University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03488-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persistent pain is a highly prevalent, global cause of disability. Research suggests that many healthcare professionals are not well equipped to manage pain, and this may be attributable at least in part to undergraduate education. The primary aim of this study was to quantify and compare first and final year nursing, midwifery and allied health professional (NMAHP) students' pain related knowledge and attitudes. The secondary aim was to explore what factors influence students' pain related knowledge and attitudes.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 1154 first and final year healthcare students, from 12 universities in five different countries completed the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Quiz (RNPQ) [knowledge] and the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) [attitudes].

RESULTS

Physiotherapy was the only student group with statistically and clinically improved pain related knowledge [mean difference, 95% CI] (3.4, 3.0 to 3.9, p = 0.01) and attitudes (-17.2, -19.2 to 15.2, p = 0.01) between first and final year. Pain education teaching varied considerably from course to course (0 to 40 h), with greater levels of pain related knowledge and attitudes associated with higher volumes of pain specific teaching.

CONCLUSIONS

There was little difference in pain knowledge and attitudes between all first and final year NMAHP students other than physiotherapy. This suggests that for most NMAHP disciplines, undergraduate teaching has little or no impact on students' understanding of pain. There is an urgent need to enhance pain education provision at the undergraduate level in NMAHPs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03522857 .

摘要

背景

持续性疼痛是一种普遍存在的、全球性的残疾原因。研究表明,许多医疗保健专业人员在管理疼痛方面能力不足,这至少部分归因于本科教育。本研究的主要目的是量化和比较护理、助产和相关健康专业(NMAHP)学生第一学年和最后一学年的疼痛相关知识和态度。次要目的是探讨影响学生疼痛相关知识和态度的因素。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,来自五个国家 12 所大学的 1154 名护理、助产和相关健康专业的第一学年和最后一学年的学生完成了修订的神经生理学疼痛测验(RNPQ)[知识]和医疗保健提供者疼痛和障碍关系量表(HC-PAIRS)[态度]。

结果

物理治疗是唯一一组学生的疼痛相关知识[平均差异,95%置信区间](3.4,3.0 至 3.9,p=0.01)和态度(-17.2,-19.2 至 15.2,p=0.01)在第一学年和最后一学年之间有统计学和临床改善的学科。疼痛教育教学从课程到课程差异很大(0 到 40 小时),与更高水平的疼痛相关知识和态度相关的是更高水平的疼痛特定教学。

结论

除了物理治疗,其他护理、助产和相关健康专业的第一学年和最后一学年的学生的疼痛知识和态度几乎没有差异。这表明,对于大多数 NMAHP 学科来说,本科教学对学生对疼痛的理解几乎没有影响。在护理、助产和相关健康专业的本科阶段,迫切需要加强疼痛教育的提供。

试验注册

研究方案前瞻性地在 ClinicalTrials.Gov 上注册 NCT03522857。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/9284700/3432b657e969/12909_2022_3488_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验