• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of Organ System Courses of the First Two Years of Medical School on the Performance of the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States (COMLEX-USA) Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation.医学院前两年器官系统课程对美国综合整骨医学执照考试(COMLEX - USA)2级认知评估成绩的影响。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 14;14(6):e25939. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25939. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Prediction of Osteopathic Medical School Performance on the basis of MCAT score, GPA, sex, undergraduate major, and undergraduate institution.基于医学院入学考试(MCAT)成绩、平均绩点(GPA)、性别、本科专业和本科院校对整骨医学院表现的预测。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012 Apr;112(4):175-81.
3
Early prediction of the risk of scoring lower than 500 on the COMLEX 1.COMLEX-1 得分低于 500 风险的早期预测。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 21;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02501-5.
4
Student performance on levels 1 and 2-CE of COMLEX-USA: do elective upper-level undergraduate science courses matter?美国综合骨科医学执照考试(COMLEX-USA)1级和2级临床评估(CE)中的学生表现:本科高年级选修科学课程重要吗?
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009 Nov;109(11):592-8.
5
Predicting Osteopathic Medical Student Performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge From Results of the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation.根据综合整骨医学执照考试二级认知评估结果预测整骨医学专业学生在美国医师执照考试第二步临床知识部分的表现。
Cureus. 2021 Nov 16;13(11):e19625. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19625. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Association Between Undergraduate Performance Predictors and Academic and Clinical Performance of Osteopathic Medical Students.本科成绩预测指标与整骨医学生学业及临床成绩之间的关联
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;118(2):106-114. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.025.
7
Relationship between COMLEX-USA scores and performance on the American Osteopathic Board of Emergency Medicine Part I certifying examination.美国骨病医学会综合骨科医学执照考试(COMLEX - USA)成绩与美国急诊医学骨病医学委员会第一部分认证考试表现之间的关系。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Apr;114(4):260-6. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.051.
8
Comparison of COMLEX-USA scores, medical school performance, and preadmission variables between women and men.美国综合骨科医学执照考试(COMLEX-USA)分数、医学院校表现以及入学前变量在男性和女性之间的比较。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015 Apr;115(4):222-5. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.044.
9
The predictive validity of MCAT scores and undergraduate GPA for COMLEX-USA licensure exam performance of students enrolled in osteopathic medical schools.医学院校学生的医学院入学考试(MCAT)成绩和本科平均绩点(GPA)对美国骨科医师执照考试(COMLEX-USA)成绩的预测效度。
J Osteopath Med. 2024 Jul 18;125(1):9-18. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0265. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
10
Examining concurrent validity between COMLEX-USA Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation and COMLEX-USA Level 2-Performance Evaluation.考察 COMLEX-USA 水平 2-认知评估与 COMLEX-USA 水平 2-表现评估之间的同时效度。
J Osteopath Med. 2021 May 13;121(8):687-691. doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0007.

本文引用的文献

1
Early prediction of the risk of scoring lower than 500 on the COMLEX 1.COMLEX-1 得分低于 500 风险的早期预测。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 21;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02501-5.
2
A Validity Study of COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE and COMAT Clinical Subjects: Concurrent and Predictive Evidence.美国综合骨科医学执照考试第二级-临床考试(COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE)与综合骨科医学临床评估测试(COMAT)临床科目的效度研究:同时效度与预测效度证据
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Oct;11(5):521-526. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00157.1.
3
Student academic performance factors affecting matching into first-choice residency and competitive specialties.影响匹配首选住院医师和竞争专业的学生学业成绩因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 1;19(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1669-9.
4
Association Between Undergraduate Performance Predictors and Academic and Clinical Performance of Osteopathic Medical Students.本科成绩预测指标与整骨医学生学业及临床成绩之间的关联
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;118(2):106-114. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.025.
5
Relationships between the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Achievement Test (COMAT) subject examinations and the COMLEX-USA Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation.综合整骨医学成就测试(COMAT)科目考试与美国骨科学术水平考试-2认知评估(COMLEX-USA Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation)之间的关系。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Sep;114(9):714-21. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.140.
6
Prediction of Osteopathic Medical School Performance on the basis of MCAT score, GPA, sex, undergraduate major, and undergraduate institution.基于医学院入学考试(MCAT)成绩、平均绩点(GPA)、性别、本科专业和本科院校对整骨医学院表现的预测。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012 Apr;112(4):175-81.
7
Student performance on levels 1 and 2-CE of COMLEX-USA: do elective upper-level undergraduate science courses matter?美国综合骨科医学执照考试(COMLEX-USA)1级和2级临床评估(CE)中的学生表现:本科高年级选修科学课程重要吗?
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009 Nov;109(11):592-8.
8
Relations between academic performance by medical students and COMLEX-USA Level 2: a multisite analysis.医学生学业成绩与美国综合骨科医学执照考试第二级(COMLEX-USA Level 2)之间的关系:一项多地点分析。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003 Nov;103(11):551-6.

医学院前两年器官系统课程对美国综合整骨医学执照考试(COMLEX - USA)2级认知评估成绩的影响。

Effects of Organ System Courses of the First Two Years of Medical School on the Performance of the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States (COMLEX-USA) Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation.

作者信息

McNeil Kevin, Mashhouri Vahid, Christensen Payton, Wang Han, Zhong Qing

机构信息

Medical School, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ivins, USA.

Medical School, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jun 14;14(6):e25939. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25939. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.25939
PMID:35844308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9282589/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States (COMLEX-USA) Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation (CE) is a board examination that medical students usually take in the third or fourth year of medical school. A few researchers have investigated the prediction of COMLEX Level 2-CE scores based on the performance in third-year clerkships. However, given how close the clerkships are to the board exam, this type of prediction is too late for students to have adequate time to get assistance to prepare for COMLEX Level 2-CE. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of each organ system course during the first two years in predicting COMLEX Level 2-CE performance. Our findings will help students at risk focus on important basic and clinical sciences much earlier before preparing for COMLEX Level 2-CE.

METHODS

Academic data from students enrolled at Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine from 2011 to 2017 were retrieved. Data included the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores, course grades in the first two years of medical school, COMLEX Level 1 scores, and COMLEX Level 2-CE scores. Pearson correlation coefficients, a multiple linear regression model, and a backward stepwise regression model were generated for analysis.

RESULTS

The highest correlation with COMLEX Level 2-CE scores was the COMLEX Level 1 score, followed by the performances in the third-semester Cardiovascular System II (CV II) and Renal System II (REN II) courses. Multiple linear regression and backward stepwise regression predictive models found that scores on third-semester CV II and Principles of Clinical Medicine III (PCM III) were the most significant predictors of performance on Level 2-CE. Both models explained 46% of the variance in COMLEX Level 2-CE scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Performances in third-semester courses are the most important predictors of COMLEX Level 2-CE scores.

摘要

目的

美国综合整骨医学执照考试(COMLEX-USA)2级认知评估(CE)是医学生通常在医学院第三年或第四年参加的一项委员会考试。一些研究人员基于三年级临床实习的表现对COMLEX 2级CE分数的预测进行了调查。然而,鉴于临床实习与委员会考试时间如此接近,这种预测对学生来说为时已晚,他们没有足够的时间获得帮助来准备COMLEX 2级CE。我们旨在研究前两年各器官系统课程在预测COMLEX 2级CE表现方面的预测价值。我们的研究结果将帮助有风险的学生在准备COMLEX 2级CE之前更早地专注于重要的基础和临床科学。

方法

检索了2011年至2017年在落基山大学整骨医学院就读的学生的学术数据。数据包括医学院入学考试(MCAT)分数、医学院前两年的课程成绩、COMLEX 1级分数和COMLEX 2级CE分数。生成了Pearson相关系数、多元线性回归模型和向后逐步回归模型进行分析。

结果

与COMLEX 2级CE分数相关性最高的是COMLEX 1级分数,其次是第三学期心血管系统II(CV II)和肾脏系统II(REN II)课程的表现。多元线性回归和向后逐步回归预测模型发现,第三学期CV II和临床医学原理III(PCM III)的分数是2级CE表现的最显著预测因素。两个模型都解释了COMLEX 2级CE分数中46%的方差。

结论

第三学期课程的表现是COMLEX 2级CE分数最重要预测因素。