Suppr超能文献

由粉末数据确定结构的不确定性:4,11-二氟喹吖啶酮的四种不同结构模型,具有相似的X射线粉末衍射图谱,与PDF、固体核磁共振和DFT-D拟合。

Ambiguous structure determination from powder data: four different structural models of 4,11-di-fluoro-quinacridone with similar X-ray powder patterns, fit to the PDF, SSNMR and DFT-D.

作者信息

Schlesinger Carina, Fitterer Arnd, Buchsbaum Christian, Habermehl Stefan, Chierotti Michele R, Nervi Carlo, Schmidt Martin U

机构信息

Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Straße 7, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Department of Chemistry and NIS centre, University of Torino, V. Giuria 7, Torino 10125, Italy.

出版信息

IUCrJ. 2022 May 14;9(Pt 4):406-424. doi: 10.1107/S2052252522004237. eCollection 2022 Jul 1.

Abstract

Four different structural models, which all fit the same X-ray powder pattern, were obtained in the structure determination of 4,11-di-fluoro-quinacridone (CHNOF) from unindexed X-ray powder data by a global fit. The models differ in their lattice parameters, space groups, , ', molecular packing and hydrogen bond patterns. The molecules form a criss-cross pattern in models A and B, a layer structure built from chains in model C and a criss-cross arrangement of dimers in model D. Nevertheless, all models give a good Rietveld fit to the experimental powder pattern with acceptable -values. All molecular geometries are reliable, except for model D, which is slightly distorted. All structures are crystallochemically plausible, concerning density, hydrogen bonds, intermolecular distances . All models passed the test without major problems; only in model A a missed symmetry was detected. All structures could have probably been published, although 3 of the 4 structures were wrong. The investigation, which of the four structures is actually the correct one, was challenging. Six methods were used: (1) Rietveld refinements, (2) fit of the crystal structures to the pair distribution function (PDF) including the refinement of lattice parameters and atomic coordinates, (3) evaluation of the colour, (4) lattice-energy minimizations with force fields, (5) lattice-energy minimizations by two dispersion-corrected density functional theory methods, and (6) multinuclear CPMAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy (H, C, F) including the comparison of calculated and experimental chemical shifts. All in all, model B (perhaps with some disorder) can probably be considered to be the correct one. This work shows that a structure determination from limited-quality powder data may result in totally different structural models, which all may be correct or wrong, even if they are chemically sensible and give a good Rietveld refinement. Additionally, the work is an excellent example that the refinement of an organic crystal structure can be successfully performed by a fit to the PDF, and the combination of computed and experimental solid-state NMR chemical shifts can provide further information for the selection of the most reliable structure among several possibilities.

摘要

通过全局拟合从未指标化的X射线粉末数据中确定4,11 - 二氟喹吖啶酮(CHNOF)的结构时,获得了四种不同的结构模型,它们都符合相同的X射线粉末衍射图。这些模型在晶格参数、空间群、 、 、分子堆积和氢键模式方面存在差异。在模型A和B中,分子形成十字交叉图案;在模型C中,分子形成由链构成的层状结构;在模型D中,分子形成二聚体的十字交叉排列。然而,所有模型对实验粉末衍射图都给出了良好的Rietveld拟合,且 值可接受。除模型D略有扭曲外,所有分子几何结构都是可靠的。就密度、氢键、分子间距离而言,所有结构在晶体化学上都是合理的。所有模型都顺利通过了 测试;仅在模型A中检测到一个遗漏的对称性。所有结构可能都可以发表,尽管这4个结构中有3个是错误的。确定这4个结构中哪一个实际上是正确的是一项具有挑战性的工作。使用了六种方法:(1)Rietveld精修;(2)将晶体结构拟合到对分布函数(PDF),包括晶格参数和原子坐标的精修;(3)颜色评估;(4)使用力场进行晶格能量最小化;(5)通过两种色散校正密度泛函理论方法进行晶格能量最小化;(6)多核CPMAS固态核磁共振光谱(H、C、F),包括计算化学位移与实验化学位移的比较。总而言之,模型B(可能存在一些无序)可能被认为是正确的。这项工作表明,从质量有限的粉末数据确定结构可能会导致完全不同的结构模型,即使它们在化学上合理且给出良好的Rietveld精修结果,这些模型也可能全对或全错。此外,这项工作是一个很好的例子,说明通过拟合PDF可以成功地对有机晶体结构进行精修,并且计算得到的和实验得到的固态核磁共振化学位移的结合可以为从几种可能性中选择最可靠的结构提供进一步的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c2/9252154/1c752b88d787/m-09-00406-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验