Goodman J F, Cecil H S
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1987 Apr;8(2):97-105.
Pennsylvania pediatricians were interrogated through a questionnaire about their referral practices with and attitudes toward mildly and moderately delayed preschool children. Whereas most sought a diagnostic evaluation for those children functioning at half their chronological age, they did not refer less seriously retarded youngsters during the preschool years, despite favorable support for early intervention. The reluctance to diagnose and label may result from pediatricians' perceptions of what mental retardation means. For the most part, the respondents have the view-at variance with major organizational definitions-that retardation implies neurological dysfunction and a chronic irreversible status. Low IQ secondary to emotional or social conditions, on the other hand, is not perceived as retardation, and is considered remediable. The attitudes and practices are discussed in light of empirical research outcomes with handicapped children and the fixity of organically determined deficits.
通过问卷调查询问了宾夕法尼亚州的儿科医生,了解他们对轻度和中度发育迟缓学龄前儿童的转诊做法及态度。尽管大多数医生会对那些发育水平仅为实际年龄一半的儿童进行诊断评估,但尽管早期干预得到了有力支持,他们在学龄前阶段并未减少对发育迟缓程度较轻儿童的转诊。不愿进行诊断和贴标签可能源于儿科医生对智力迟钝含义的认知。在很大程度上,受访者的观点与主要组织定义不同,即他们认为智力迟钝意味着神经功能障碍和慢性不可逆状态。另一方面,因情绪或社会状况导致的低智商则不被视为智力迟钝,而是被认为可补救。结合对残疾儿童的实证研究结果以及器质性缺陷的固定性,对这些态度和做法进行了讨论。