Goyal Hemant, Sachdeva Sonali, Sherazi Syed Ali Amir, Gupta Shweta, Perisetti Abhilash, Ali Aman, Chandan Saurabh, Tharian Benjamin, Sharma Neil, Thosani Nirav
University of Texas at Houston, McGovern School of Medicine, Texas, United States.
Mercer University School of Medicine, Internal Medicine, Macon, Georgia, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jul 15;10(7):E952-E970. doi: 10.1055/a-1793-9508. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication attributed to the procedure, its incidence being approximately 9.7 %. Numerous studies have evaluated the predictive efficacy of post-procedure serum amylase and lipase levels but with varied procedure-to-test time intervals and cut-off values. The aim of this meta-analysis was to present pooled data from available studies to compare the predictive accuracies of serum amylase and lipase for PEP. A total of 18 studies were identified after a comprehensive search of various databases until June 2021 that reported the use of pancreatic enzymes for PEP. The sample size consisted of 11,790 ERCPs, of which PEP occurred in 764 (6.48 %). Subgroups for serum lipase and amylase were created based on the cut-off used for diagnosing PEP, and meta-analysis was done for each subgroup. Results showed that serum lipase more than three to four times the upper limit of normal (ULN) performed within 2 to 4 hours of ERCP had the highest pooled sensitivity (92 %) for PEP. Amylase level more than five to six times the ULN was the most specific serum marker with a pooled specificity of 93 %. Our analysis indicates that a lipase level less than three times the ULN within 2 to 4 hours of ERCP can be used as a good predictor to rule out PEP when used as an adjunct to patient clinical presentation. Multicenter randomized controlled trials using lipase and amylase are warranted to further evaluate their PEP predictive accuracy, especially in high-risk patients.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎(PEP)是该手术最常见的并发症,其发生率约为9.7%。许多研究评估了术后血清淀粉酶和脂肪酶水平的预测效能,但手术至检测的时间间隔和临界值各不相同。本荟萃分析的目的是汇总现有研究的数据,以比较血清淀粉酶和脂肪酶对PEP的预测准确性。在对各种数据库进行全面检索后,截至2021年6月共确定了18项报告使用胰腺酶诊断PEP的研究。样本量包括11790例内镜逆行胰胆管造影术,其中764例(6.48%)发生了PEP。根据诊断PEP所采用的临界值创建血清脂肪酶和淀粉酶亚组,并对每个亚组进行荟萃分析。结果显示,在ERCP术后2至4小时内检测,血清脂肪酶超过正常上限(ULN)三至四倍时,对PEP的合并敏感度最高(92%)。淀粉酶水平超过ULN五至六倍是最具特异性的血清标志物,合并特异性为93%。我们的分析表明,在ERCP术后2至4小时内,脂肪酶水平低于ULN三倍时,作为患者临床表现的辅助指标,可作为排除PEP的良好预测指标。有必要开展使用脂肪酶和淀粉酶的多中心随机对照试验,以进一步评估它们对PEP的预测准确性,尤其是在高危患者中。