Suppr超能文献

治疗强直性脊柱炎的最佳生物制剂:一项网络荟萃分析和网络荟萃回归研究的结果。

Optimal Biologic Drugs for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis and Network Metaregression.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery and Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 6;2022:8316106. doi: 10.1155/2022/8316106. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a common immune-related systemic chronic inflammatory osteoarthropathy. Previous studies have proven that biologic agents, including IL-17A inhibitors (IL17Ai), TNF- inhibitor FC fusion protein (TNFiFCP), or fully human monoclonal antibody (TNFiNMA) and JAK inhibitor (JAKi), are effective for AS treatment. Our study is aimed at comparing the clinical efficacy, tolerability, and safety of different biological agents, including novel IL-6 inhibitor (IL6i), IL-23 inhibitor (IL23i), and IL-17 A/F dual variable domain inhibitor (IL17AFi) in AS.

METHOD

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CNKI, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. A frequentist framework network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed. Ranking effects were calculated by surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA) and cluster-rank analysis.

RESULTS

IL17AFi reported both the highest ASAS40 (SUCRA = 91.4%) and ASAS20 (SUCRA = 92.5%) response, while IL6i and IL23i reported the lowest responses (SUCRA = 6.6% and 19.9%, respectively). With the exceptions of IL6i (RR 0.60, 95% CI (0.22 to 1.67) for ASAS40 and 1.36 (0.71 to 2.58) for ASAS20) and IL23i (0.98 (0.68 to 1.40) for ASAS40 and 0.91 (0.70 to 1.19) for ASAS20), all biological drugs demonstrated statistically superior ASAS responses than placebo. TNFiFMA performed best in the suppression of disease activity (SUCRA = 77.4%, SMD 2.35, and 95% CI (1.11 to 3.59)) and functional improvement (SUCRA = 68.8%, SMD 1.67, and 95% CI (0.59 to 2.74)). There were no significant differences in tolerability or safety between biologic drugs and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel IL-17 A/F dual variable domain inhibitor, bimekizumab, may be an ideal future treatment choice for AS, while IL-23 and IL-6 inhibitors demonstrate little potential in the treatment of AS. For patients with rapid disease progression and severe functional limitation, TNF- inhibitors, especially infliximab, are safe and effective and could be a first-line treatment choice.

摘要

背景

强直性脊柱炎(AS)是一种常见的免疫相关系统性慢性炎症性骨关节病。既往研究已证实生物制剂,包括白细胞介素-17A 抑制剂(IL-17Ai)、肿瘤坏死因子-α 抑制剂 FC 融合蛋白(TNFiFCP)或全人源单克隆抗体(TNFiNMA)和 Janus 激酶抑制剂(JAKi),对 AS 治疗有效。本研究旨在比较新型白细胞介素-6 抑制剂(IL6i)、白细胞介素-23 抑制剂(IL23i)和白细胞介素-17A/F 双可变域抑制剂(IL17AFi)等不同生物制剂在 AS 中的临床疗效、耐受性和安全性。

方法

系统检索 PubMed、Scopus、Embase、CNKI 和 Cochrane 图书馆。采用随机效应模型的频率论框架网络荟萃分析。通过排序累积概率分析(SUCRA)和聚类排序分析计算排序效果。

结果

IL17AFi 报告了最高的 ASAS40(SUCRA=91.4%)和 ASAS20(SUCRA=92.5%)应答率,而 IL6i 和 IL23i 报告的应答率最低(SUCRA=6.6%和 19.9%)。除 IL6i(RR0.60,95%CI(0.22 至 1.67)用于 ASAS40 和 1.36(0.71 至 2.58)用于 ASAS20)和 IL23i(0.98(0.68 至 1.40)用于 ASAS40 和 0.91(0.70 至 1.19)用于 ASAS20)外,所有生物药物在 ASAS 应答方面均优于安慰剂。TNFiFMA 在抑制疾病活动方面表现最佳(SUCRA=77.4%,SMD2.35,95%CI(1.11 至 3.59))和改善功能方面表现最佳(SUCRA=68.8%,SMD1.67,95%CI(0.59 至 2.74))。生物药物与安慰剂在耐受性或安全性方面无显著差异。

结论

新型白细胞介素-17A/F 双可变域抑制剂,bimekizumab,可能是 AS 的一种理想的未来治疗选择,而白细胞介素-23 和白细胞介素-6 抑制剂在 AS 治疗中潜力不大。对于疾病进展迅速和功能严重受限的患者,TNF-α 抑制剂,特别是英夫利昔单抗,安全有效,可作为一线治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3f/9279076/df5b49024397/BMRI2022-8316106.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验