• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

III期喉癌的治疗结果:使用倾向评分对人群数据库的分析

Treatment Results for Stage III Laryngeal Cancer: Analysis of a Populational Database Using Propensity Scores.

作者信息

Köhler Hugo Fontan, Carvalho Genival Barbosa de, Kowalski Luiz Paulo

机构信息

Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otolaryngology, A C Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov 3;26(3):e370-e379. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726042. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1726042
PMID:35846820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9282961/
Abstract

Treatment of stage III laryngeal cancer suffered a major paradigm change with surgery being substituted by radiation therapy with chemotherapy.  To evaluate the oncological outcome of different treatment modalities for stage III laryngeal cancer using a population database.  A population database representing patients treated in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, was analyzed. Demographic, clinical and treatment variables were included, and the outcomes of interest were disease-specific and overall survival. Propensity score with nearest neighbor matching was used to compensate for imbalances in treatment groups.  We retrieved data from 1,804 patients. In multivariate analysis, age, female gender, payment source, clinical N stage (cN) stages, and treatment modality were significant for disease-specific and overall survival. Patients submitted to surgery treatment had a significantly better disease-specific (  < 0.001) and overall survival (  < 0.001) compared with chemoradiation. Propensity score matching was based on cN stage, gender, age, topography, and payment modality, and allowed the pairing of 685 patients from each treatment modality. There was a significant difference in disease-specific survival favoring surgery-based treatment (  = 0.017).  The treatment choice has a significant impact on survival in patients with stage III laryngeal cancer with surgery-based treatment being superior to chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

摘要

III期喉癌的治疗经历了重大的模式转变,手术被放化疗所取代。

使用人群数据库评估III期喉癌不同治疗方式的肿瘤学结局。

分析了代表巴西圣保罗州接受治疗患者的人群数据库。纳入了人口统计学、临床和治疗变量,感兴趣的结局是疾病特异性生存和总生存。采用倾向评分最近邻匹配来弥补治疗组之间的不均衡。

我们检索了1804例患者的数据。在多变量分析中,年龄、女性性别、支付来源、临床N分期(cN)以及治疗方式对疾病特异性生存和总生存有显著影响。与放化疗相比,接受手术治疗的患者疾病特异性生存(P<0.001)和总生存(P<0.001)显著更好。倾向评分匹配基于cN分期、性别、年龄、肿瘤部位和支付方式,使得每种治疗方式有685例患者配对。在疾病特异性生存方面,基于手术的治疗具有显著差异(P = 0.017)。

治疗选择对III期喉癌患者的生存有显著影响,基于手术的治疗优于放化疗(CRT)。

相似文献

1
Treatment Results for Stage III Laryngeal Cancer: Analysis of a Populational Database Using Propensity Scores.III期喉癌的治疗结果:使用倾向评分对人群数据库的分析
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov 3;26(3):e370-e379. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726042. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Impact of treatment modality on survival in patients with stage IV laryngeal cancer: A population-based propensity score analysis.治疗方式对 IV 期喉癌患者生存的影响:基于人群的倾向评分分析。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):102626. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102626. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
3
Duration of chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation affects survival outcomes for resected stage I-II or unresected stage III pancreatic cancer.在接受放化疗之前进行化疗的时间长短会影响可切除的 I-II 期或不可切除的 III 期胰腺癌患者的生存结局。
Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(9):4110-4123. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2326. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
4
The Prognostic Impact of Preoperative and Postoperative Chemoradiation in Clinical Stage II and III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Population Based Study in Taiwan.术前和术后放化疗对临床II期和III期食管鳞状细胞癌的预后影响:台湾一项基于人群的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jun;94(25):e1002. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001002.
5
Different Impacts of Preoperative Radiotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy on Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Stages II and III Lower Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis.术前放疗与放化疗对Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期低位直肠癌患者肿瘤学结局的不同影响:一项倾向评分分析
Dig Surg. 2018;35(3):212-219. doi: 10.1159/000477778. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Differences in Survival With Surgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy Compared With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Oral Cavity Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.口腔癌手术及术后放疗与根治性放化疗相比的生存差异:一项国家癌症数据库分析
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jul 1;143(7):691-699. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0012.
7
Comparison between surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.可切除食管鳞状细胞癌患者手术与根治性放化疗的比较:一项倾向评分分析
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct;21(5):890-898. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-0963-3. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
8
Effect of surgery on survival in patients with stage III N2 small cell lung cancer: propensity score matching analysis and nomogram development and validation.手术对 III 期 N2 小细胞肺癌患者生存的影响:倾向评分匹配分析和列线图的建立和验证。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug 30;19(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02364-6.
9
Adding concurrent chemotherapy to postoperative radiotherapy improves locoregional control but Not overall survival in patients with salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma-a propensity score matched study.在涎腺腺样囊性癌患者中,术后放疗联合同期化疗可改善局部区域控制,但不能提高总生存率——一项倾向评分匹配研究
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Mar 22;11:47. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0617-7.
10
Impact of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone on Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Stage II and III Upper Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.术后同步放化疗与单纯化疗对Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期上段直肠癌患者复发及生存的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0123657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123657. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Circulating miRNAs Validated by Multiple Independent Studies in Laryngeal Cancer.一项关于经多项独立研究验证的喉癌循环微小RNA的系统评价。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;15(3):394. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15030394.
2
Laryngeal Preservation Rate and Salvage Therapy Following Initial Recurrence in a Real-world Setting After Definitive Radiation Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.局部晚期喉鳞状细胞癌患者根治性放疗后在现实环境中首次复发后的喉保留率及挽救性治疗
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024 Jul 3;4(4):424-429. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10342. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of medical comorbidities on treatment regimen and survival in T3/T4 laryngeal cancer.医疗合并症对 T3/T4 喉癌治疗方案和生存的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jun;130(6):1459-1464. doi: 10.1002/lary.28227. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
2
Curative-dose Chemoradiotherapy Versus Total Laryngectomy For Stage T3-T4 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx: An "Apples-to-Apples" Analysis of the National Cancer Database.根治剂量放化疗与全喉切除术治疗 T3-T4 期喉鳞状细胞癌:国家癌症数据库的“苹果对苹果”分析。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun;42(6):527-533. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000550.
3
Efficacy comparison between primary total laryngectomy and nonsurgical organ-preservation strategies in treatment of advanced stage laryngeal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Overview of glottic laryngeal cancer treatment recommendation changes in the NCCN guidelines from 2011 to 2022.
NCCN 指南中 2011 年至 2022 年声门型喉癌治疗推荐变化概述。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Aug;6(8):e1837. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1837. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
晚期喉癌治疗中全喉切除术与非手术器官保留策略的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May;97(21):e10625. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010625.
4
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes for T3 Glottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.T3 声门鳞状细胞癌治疗结果的比较:一项荟萃分析
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2017.00717. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
5
Survival Outcomes for Patients With T3N0M0 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Glottic Larynx.声门型喉T3N0M0鳞状细胞癌患者的生存结果
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Nov 1;143(11):1126-1133. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1756.
6
Impact of stage, management and recurrence on survival rates in laryngeal cancer.分期、治疗及复发对喉癌生存率的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 14;12(7):e0179371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179371. eCollection 2017.
7
Definitive Radiotherapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Glottic Larynx.声门型喉鳞状细胞癌的根治性放射治疗
Cancer Control. 2016 Jul;23(3):208-12. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300303.
8
Tumor Volumes and Prognosis in Laryngeal Cancer.喉癌的肿瘤体积与预后
Cancers (Basel). 2015 Nov 10;7(4):2236-61. doi: 10.3390/cancers7040888.
9
Treatment Selection for T3/T4a Laryngeal Cancer: Chemoradiation Versus Primary Surgery.T3/T4a期喉癌的治疗选择:放化疗与原发手术对比
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Nov;124(11):845-51. doi: 10.1177/0003489415588130. Epub 2015 May 19.
10
T3-T4 laryngeal cancer in The Netherlands Cancer Institute; 10-year results of the consistent application of an organ-preserving/-sacrificing protocol.荷兰癌症研究所的T3 - T4期喉癌;器官保留/牺牲方案持续应用的10年结果
Head Neck. 2015 Oct;37(10):1495-503. doi: 10.1002/hed.23789. Epub 2014 Oct 10.