Zhou Zhiqing, Chen Songmei, Li Yuanli, Zhao Jingjun, Li Guanwu, Chen Lei, Wu Yuwei, Zhang Sicong, Shi Xiaolong, Chen Xixi, Xu Shutian, Ren Meng, Chang Shixin, Shan Chunlei
Center of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 30;13:916990. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.916990. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to investigate brain plasticity by somatosensory stimulation (SS) and sensory observation (SO) based on mirror neuron and embodied cognition theory. Action observation therapy has been widely adopted for motor function improvement in post-stroke patients. However, it is uncertain whether the SO approach can also contribute to the recovery of sensorimotor function after stroke. In this study, we explored the therapeutic potential of SO for sensorimotor dysfunction and provided new evidence for neurorehabilitation.
Twenty-six healthy right-handed adults (12 men and 14 women), aged 18-27 (mean, 22.12; SD, 2.12) years were included. All subjects were evaluated with task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to discover the characteristics and differences in brain activation between SO and SS. We adopted a block design with two conditions during fMRI scanning: observing a sensory video of brushing (task condition A, defined as SO) and brushing subjects' right forearms while they watched a nonsense string (task condition B, defined as SS). One-sample -tests were performed to identify brain regions and voxels activated for each task condition. A paired-sample -test and conjunction analysis were performed to explore the differences and similarities between SO and SS.
The task-based fMRI showed that the bilateral postcentral gyrus, left precentral gyrus, bilateral middle temporal gyrus, right supramarginal gyrus, and left supplementary motor area were significantly activated during SO or SS. In addition to these brain regions, SO could also activate areas containing mirror neurons, like the left inferior parietal gyrus.
SO could activate mirror neurons and sensorimotor network-related brain regions in healthy subjects like SS. Therefore, SO may be a promising novel therapeutic approach for sensorimotor dysfunction recovery in post-stroke patients.
本研究旨在基于镜像神经元和具身认知理论,通过体感刺激(SS)和感觉观察(SO)来探究脑可塑性。动作观察疗法已被广泛应用于改善中风后患者的运动功能。然而,尚不确定SO方法是否也有助于中风后感觉运动功能的恢复。在本研究中,我们探讨了SO对感觉运动功能障碍的治疗潜力,并为神经康复提供了新的证据。
纳入26名健康的右利手成年人(12名男性和14名女性),年龄在18 - 27岁(平均22.12岁;标准差2.12岁)。所有受试者均接受基于任务的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)评估,以发现SO和SS之间脑激活的特征和差异。在fMRI扫描期间,我们采用了包含两种条件的组块设计:观察刷牙的感觉视频(任务条件A,定义为SO)以及在受试者观看无意义字符串时刷其右前臂(任务条件B,定义为SS)。进行单样本检验以识别每个任务条件下激活的脑区和体素。进行配对样本检验和联合分析以探索SO和SS之间的差异和相似性。
基于任务的fMRI显示,在SO或SS期间,双侧中央后回、左侧中央前回、双侧颞中回、右侧缘上回和左侧辅助运动区均显著激活。除了这些脑区,SO还可激活包含镜像神经元的区域,如左侧顶下小叶。
与SS一样,SO可激活健康受试者的镜像神经元和感觉运动网络相关脑区。因此,SO可能是一种有前景的新型治疗方法,用于中风后患者感觉运动功能障碍的恢复。