Chandler M J, Grammer L C, Patterson R
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1987 Jun;79(6):883-6. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(87)90236-3.
Possible allergic sensitivity to local anesthetic agents remains problematic for some patients who could benefit from their use. We retrospectively reviewed all our consultations for evaluation of local anesthetic allergy from 1965 to 1985 to assess the safety and efficacy of skin testing and provocative test dosing with a variety of local anesthetic agents. Fifty-nine patients reported 70 reactions from the administration of six different local anesthetics. Fifty-four patients could name one or more local anesthetic agents they believed were responsible, and five patients named only "caine" drugs. Multiple reactions of the same type to the same agent were considered as one reaction. On the basis of their history of reaction, the patients were categorized as follows: anaphylactoid reactions (urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, or hypotension within 1 to 2 hours of exposure), possible anaphylactoid reactions (tachycardia, dizziness, syncope, breathlessness, or pruritus occurring within 1 to 2 hours of exposure), contact dermatitis (a typical eczematous skin eruption after appropriate cutaneous sensitization), and other reactions (nonanaphylactoid reactions other than those already described or those occurring more than 2 hours after exposure). Fifty-nine patients were administered local anesthetics after skin testing and provocative test dosing, including two patients who required intravenous lidocaine (Xylocaine; Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., Westboro, Mass.) acutely to control cardiac arrhythmias. These two patients had reported anaphylactoid reactions to oral antiarrhythmic drugs of the local anesthetic class. Despite the history of previous reactions, there were no positive skin tests or positive provocative drug challenges in any patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对于某些可从局部麻醉剂使用中获益的患者而言,对局部麻醉剂可能的过敏敏感性仍是个问题。我们回顾性分析了1965年至1985年间所有因评估局部麻醉剂过敏而进行的会诊,以评估使用多种局部麻醉剂进行皮肤试验和激发试验给药的安全性和有效性。59名患者报告了因使用六种不同局部麻醉剂而出现的70次反应。54名患者能说出一种或多种他们认为有责任的局部麻醉剂,5名患者只提到了“卡因”类药物。对同一药物的同一类型的多次反应被视为一次反应。根据他们的反应史,患者被分类如下:类过敏反应(接触后1至2小时内出现荨麻疹、血管性水肿、喘息或低血压)、可能的类过敏反应(接触后1至2小时内出现心动过速、头晕、晕厥、呼吸急促或瘙痒)、接触性皮炎(适当皮肤致敏后典型的湿疹样皮肤疹)和其他反应(除上述反应或接触后2小时以上出现的反应外的非类过敏反应)。59名患者在进行皮肤试验和激发试验给药后接受了局部麻醉剂,其中包括两名需要静脉注射利多卡因(赛罗卡因;阿斯特拉制药公司,马萨诸塞州韦斯特伯勒)以急性控制心律失常的患者。这两名患者报告对局部麻醉类口服抗心律失常药物有类过敏反应。尽管有既往反应史,但所有患者的皮肤试验或激发药物试验均无阳性结果。(摘要截短至250字)