照顾者离散选择试验的伦理考虑
Ethical Considerations for Discrete Choice Experiments with Caregivers.
机构信息
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Neuroethics Canada, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
出版信息
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Oct;17(4):426-430. doi: 10.1177/15562646221112339. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
Abstract
We discuss research ethics challenges experienced while running a discrete choice experiment administered to caregivers of children with treatment resistant pediatric epilepsy. We highlight ethical considerations around the study design of the discrete choice experimental paradigm that pertain to vulnerability of and caregiving burden on the population, imbalance of benefit-to-load of participation, and limitations of cultural meaningfulness and generalizability.
摘要
我们讨论了在对治疗抵抗性小儿癫痫患儿的照顾者进行离散选择实验时遇到的研究伦理挑战。我们强调了离散选择实验范式的研究设计中与人群脆弱性和照顾负担、参与的利益与负担平衡、文化意义和普遍性的局限性有关的伦理考虑。
相似文献
1
Ethical Considerations for Discrete Choice Experiments with Caregivers.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Oct;17(4):426-430. doi: 10.1177/15562646221112339. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
Understanding Attributes that Influence Physician and Caregiver Decisions About Neurotechnology for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Formative Qualitative Study to Support the Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Patient. 2022 Mar;15(2):219-232. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00544-w. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
Ethical challenges in research with orphans and vulnerable children: a qualitative study of researcher experiences.
Int Health. 2016 May;8(3):187-96. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihw020.
4
Community perspectives on research consent involving vulnerable children in Western Kenya.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Oct;7(4):44-55. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.4.44.
5
Vulnerability in human research.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2020 May;38(1):68-82. doi: 10.1007/s40592-020-00110-4.
6
The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Summer;4(3):44-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160490497083.
7
Ethical Issues in Conducting Research With Children and Families Affected by Disasters.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 May 18;20(6):42. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0902-2.
8
Ethical considerations of research in disaster-stricken populations.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):109-14. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00006634.
9
Beyond Compliance Checking: A Situated Approach to Visual Research Ethics.
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Jun;15(2):293-303. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9850-0. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
10
Ethical Considerations of Social Media to Recruit Caregivers of Children With Cancer.
Nurs Res. 2021 Jan/Feb;70(1):67-71. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000473.
引用本文的文献
1
Eliciting preferences of persons with dementia and informal caregivers to support ageing in place in the Netherlands: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 10;13(12):e075671. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075671.
本文引用的文献
1
Understanding Attributes that Influence Physician and Caregiver Decisions About Neurotechnology for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Formative Qualitative Study to Support the Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Patient. 2022 Mar;15(2):219-232. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00544-w. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
Choice and Trade-offs: Parent Decision Making for Neurotechnologies for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.
J Child Neurol. 2021 Oct;36(11):943-949. doi: 10.1177/08830738211015010. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the well-being of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities and their parents.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2021 May;57(5):631-636. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15285. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
4
Novel Neurotechnological Interventions for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Physician Perspectives.
J Child Neurol. 2021 Mar;36(3):222-229. doi: 10.1177/0883073820966935. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
5
Patient and parental assessment of factors influencing the choice of treatment in pediatric hydrocephalus.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020 Aug 7;26(5):490-494. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.PEDS2095. Print 2020 Nov 1.
6
RE: Canadian Assessment of Deep Brain Stimulation Access: The Canada Study.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2021 Jan;48(1):130-131. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2020.151. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Attribute development and level selection for a discrete choice experiment to elicit the preferences of health care providers for capitation payment mechanism in Kenya.
Health Econ Rev. 2019 Oct 30;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0247-5.
8
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
9
Discrete Choice Experiment Response Rates: A Meta-analysis.
Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-817. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
10
Ethical reproducibility: towards transparent reporting in biomedical research.
Nat Methods. 2013 Sep;10(9):843-5. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2564.
Zotero 插件