• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照顾者离散选择试验的伦理考虑

Ethical Considerations for Discrete Choice Experiments with Caregivers.

机构信息

Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Neuroethics Canada, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Oct;17(4):426-430. doi: 10.1177/15562646221112339. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1177/15562646221112339
PMID:35849082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9398987/
Abstract

We discuss research ethics challenges experienced while running a discrete choice experiment administered to caregivers of children with treatment resistant pediatric epilepsy. We highlight ethical considerations around the study design of the discrete choice experimental paradigm that pertain to vulnerability of and caregiving burden on the population, imbalance of benefit-to-load of participation, and limitations of cultural meaningfulness and generalizability.

摘要

我们讨论了在对治疗抵抗性小儿癫痫患儿的照顾者进行离散选择实验时遇到的研究伦理挑战。我们强调了离散选择实验范式的研究设计中与人群脆弱性和照顾负担、参与的利益与负担平衡、文化意义和普遍性的局限性有关的伦理考虑。

相似文献

1
Ethical Considerations for Discrete Choice Experiments with Caregivers.照顾者离散选择试验的伦理考虑
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Oct;17(4):426-430. doi: 10.1177/15562646221112339. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
Understanding Attributes that Influence Physician and Caregiver Decisions About Neurotechnology for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Formative Qualitative Study to Support the Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment.理解影响医生和护理人员关于儿科药物难治性癫痫神经技术决策的属性:支持离散选择实验开发的形成性定性研究。
Patient. 2022 Mar;15(2):219-232. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00544-w. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
Ethical challenges in research with orphans and vulnerable children: a qualitative study of researcher experiences.针对孤儿和弱势儿童的研究中的伦理挑战:对研究者经历的定性研究
Int Health. 2016 May;8(3):187-96. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihw020.
4
Community perspectives on research consent involving vulnerable children in Western Kenya.肯尼亚西部社区对涉及弱势儿童的研究同意书的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Oct;7(4):44-55. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.4.44.
5
Vulnerability in human research.人类研究中的脆弱性。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2020 May;38(1):68-82. doi: 10.1007/s40592-020-00110-4.
6
The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.“脆弱性”作为对人类研究参与者的一种保护措施的局限性。
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Summer;4(3):44-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160490497083.
7
Ethical Issues in Conducting Research With Children and Families Affected by Disasters.灾难中受影响的儿童和家庭开展研究的伦理问题。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 May 18;20(6):42. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0902-2.
8
Ethical considerations of research in disaster-stricken populations.受灾人群研究中的伦理考量。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):109-14. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00006634.
9
Beyond Compliance Checking: A Situated Approach to Visual Research Ethics.超越合规检查:一种情境化的视觉研究伦理方法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Jun;15(2):293-303. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9850-0. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
10
Ethical Considerations of Social Media to Recruit Caregivers of Children With Cancer.社交媒体招募癌症患儿照顾者的伦理考虑
Nurs Res. 2021 Jan/Feb;70(1):67-71. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000473.

引用本文的文献

1
Eliciting preferences of persons with dementia and informal caregivers to support ageing in place in the Netherlands: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.荷兰痴呆症患者和非正规照护者对支持就地养老偏好的 elicitation:一项离散选择实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 10;13(12):e075671. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075671.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Attributes that Influence Physician and Caregiver Decisions About Neurotechnology for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Formative Qualitative Study to Support the Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment.理解影响医生和护理人员关于儿科药物难治性癫痫神经技术决策的属性:支持离散选择实验开发的形成性定性研究。
Patient. 2022 Mar;15(2):219-232. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00544-w. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
Choice and Trade-offs: Parent Decision Making for Neurotechnologies for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.选择与权衡:父母在儿科耐药性癫痫的神经技术决策
J Child Neurol. 2021 Oct;36(11):943-949. doi: 10.1177/08830738211015010. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the well-being of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities and their parents.COVID-19 大流行对有神经发育障碍的儿童及其父母的幸福感的影响。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2021 May;57(5):631-636. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15285. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
4
Novel Neurotechnological Interventions for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Physician Perspectives.新型神经技术干预儿科耐药性癫痫:医生观点。
J Child Neurol. 2021 Mar;36(3):222-229. doi: 10.1177/0883073820966935. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
5
Patient and parental assessment of factors influencing the choice of treatment in pediatric hydrocephalus.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020 Aug 7;26(5):490-494. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.PEDS2095. Print 2020 Nov 1.
6
RE: Canadian Assessment of Deep Brain Stimulation Access: The Canada Study.主题:加拿大深部脑刺激治疗可及性评估:加拿大研究
Can J Neurol Sci. 2021 Jan;48(1):130-131. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2020.151. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Attribute development and level selection for a discrete choice experiment to elicit the preferences of health care providers for capitation payment mechanism in Kenya.肯尼亚用于引出医疗服务提供者对按人头付费机制偏好的离散选择实验的属性开发与水平选择
Health Econ Rev. 2019 Oct 30;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0247-5.
8
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
9
Discrete Choice Experiment Response Rates: A Meta-analysis.离散选择实验的应答率:一项荟萃分析
Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-817. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
10
Ethical reproducibility: towards transparent reporting in biomedical research.伦理可重复性:迈向生物医学研究的透明报告。
Nat Methods. 2013 Sep;10(9):843-5. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2564.