• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《进食评估工具-10(EAT-10)在吞咽障碍筛查中的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析》。

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) in Screening Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang Medical University, 7166 Baotong West Street, Weifang, Shandong, China.

School of Medical, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Dysphagia. 2023 Feb;38(1):145-158. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10486-6. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00455-022-10486-6
PMID:35849209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9873714/
Abstract

The Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) is used worldwide to screen people quickly and easily at high risk for swallowing disorders. However, the best EAT-10 cutoff value is still controversial. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we estimated and compared the diagnostic accuracy of EAT-10 cutoff values of 2 and 3 for screening dysphagia. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WANFANG, and VIP databases from May 2008 to March 2022. The meta-analysis included 7 studies involving 1064 subjects from 7 different countries. Two studies were classified as high quality and five studies as medium quality. With an EAT-10 cutoff value of 2, using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing or video fluoroscopic swallowing study as the gold standard, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.93), 0.59 (95% CI 0.39-0.77), 2.17 (95% CI 1.38-3.42), 0.19 (95% CI 0.13-0.29), and 11.49 (95% CI 5.86-22.53), respectively. When a cutoff of 3 was used, these values were 0.85 (95% CI 0.68-0.94), 0.82 (95% CI 0.65-0.92), 4.84 (95% CI 1.72-13.50), 0.18 (95% CI 0.07-0.46), and 26.24 (95% CI 5.06-135.95), respectively. Using EAT-10 cutoff values of 2 and 3, the areas under the curve were 0.873 (95% CI 0.82-0.93) and 0.903 (95% CI 0.88-0.93), respectively, showing good diagnostic performance. EAT-10 can be used as a preliminary screening tool for dysphagia. However, a cutoff of 3 is recommended for EAT-10 due to better diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

《进食评估量表-10(EAT-10)》被广泛用于快速、简便地筛查吞咽障碍高风险人群。然而,最佳的 EAT-10 截断值仍存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估和比较 EAT-10 截断值为 2 和 3 时筛查吞咽困难的诊断准确性。我们检索了 2008 年 5 月至 2022 年 3 月期间 PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、CNKI、WANFANG 和 VIP 数据库。荟萃分析纳入了来自 7 个不同国家的 7 项研究,共 1064 名受试者。其中 2 项研究被归类为高质量,5 项研究为中等质量。使用灵活的内镜吞咽评估或视频荧光透视吞咽研究作为金标准,EAT-10 截断值为 2 时,汇总的敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断比值比分别为 0.89(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.82-0.93)、0.59(95% CI 0.39-0.77)、2.17(95% CI 1.38-3.42)、0.19(95% CI 0.13-0.29)和 11.49(95% CI 5.86-22.53)。当截断值为 3 时,这些值分别为 0.85(95% CI 0.68-0.94)、0.82(95% CI 0.65-0.92)、4.84(95% CI 1.72-13.50)、0.18(95% CI 0.07-0.46)和 26.24(95% CI 5.06-135.95)。使用 EAT-10 截断值 2 和 3 时,曲线下面积分别为 0.873(95% CI 0.82-0.93)和 0.903(95% CI 0.88-0.93),具有良好的诊断性能。EAT-10 可作为吞咽困难的初步筛查工具。然而,由于诊断准确性更高,建议 EAT-10 的截断值为 3。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/4631e2f17811/455_2022_10486_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/b64aa37b5293/455_2022_10486_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/0133c727744c/455_2022_10486_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/ce1ccff56b9e/455_2022_10486_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/7e4a508ee4d2/455_2022_10486_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/4631e2f17811/455_2022_10486_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/b64aa37b5293/455_2022_10486_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/0133c727744c/455_2022_10486_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/ce1ccff56b9e/455_2022_10486_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/7e4a508ee4d2/455_2022_10486_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d876/9873714/4631e2f17811/455_2022_10486_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) in Screening Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.《进食评估工具-10(EAT-10)在吞咽障碍筛查中的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析》。
Dysphagia. 2023 Feb;38(1):145-158. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10486-6. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
Screening for aspiration risk associated with dysphagia in acute stroke.筛查急性脑卒中吞咽困难相关的吸入风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 18;10(10):CD012679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012679.pub2.
3
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Selected laboratory-based biomarkers for assessing vitamin A deficiency in at-risk individuals.用于评估高危个体维生素A缺乏症的选定实验室生物标志物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 28;5:CD013742. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013742.pub2.
6
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
7
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
8
Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.幽门螺杆菌感染的非侵入性诊断测试。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 15;3(3):CD012080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012080.pub2.
9
Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance.用于肺外结核病和利福平耐药性的Xpert MTB/RIF检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 27;8(8):CD012768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012768.pub2.
10
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Standardized swallowing assessment among community-dwelling older adults in China.中国社区居住老年人标准化吞咽评估的信度与效度
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2548980. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2548980. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
2
Dysphagia and Oral Health in Older Adults with Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.患有运动认知风险综合征的老年人的吞咽困难与口腔健康
Dysphagia. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00455-025-10849-9.
3
Current Technological Advances in Dysphagia Screening: Systematic Scoping Review.吞咽困难筛查的当前技术进展:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 5;27:e65551. doi: 10.2196/65551.
4
Validation and Reliability of the Polish Version of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 Questionnaire.波兰版饮食评估工具-10问卷的效度与信度
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 8;17(8):1291. doi: 10.3390/nu17081291.
5
Age-defying swallowing.逆龄吞咽。
Front Aging. 2025 Apr 7;6:1510257. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1510257. eCollection 2025.
6
Validation of the Swedish Eating Assessment Tool, S-EAT-10, for patients with head and neck cancer.瑞典饮食评估工具S-EAT-10在头颈癌患者中的有效性验证。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):13109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97170-5.
7
Exploring the Effects of Action Observation Therapy on Swallowing Disorders in Stroke: A Functional Connectivity-Based fMRI Study.探索动作观察疗法对中风吞咽障碍的影响:一项基于功能连接的功能磁共振成像研究。
Neural Plast. 2025 Mar 31;2025:8176431. doi: 10.1155/np/8176431. eCollection 2025.
8
Accuracy of tongue strength, endurance, and pressure using Iowa oral performance instrument and predictors of dysphagia in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study.使用爱荷华口腔功能仪器评估社区居住老年人的舌肌力量、耐力和压力的准确性以及吞咽困难的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05859-z.
9
Self-perception and clinical presentation of eating and swallowing difficulties within elderly care.老年护理中进食和吞咽困难的自我认知与临床表现
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2025 Mar 4;72(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v72i1.1078.
10
Volume-viscosity swallow test to facilitate individualized dietary modifications for dysphagia following intracerebral hemorrhage.容量-黏度吞咽测试以促进脑出血后吞咽困难的个体化饮食调整。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan 25. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09242-x.