Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug 1;140(2):212-219. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004869. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
To compare maternal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies of patients who had a prior classical cesarean delivery with those with a prior low transverse cesarean delivery.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of patients with live singleton births at or after 24 weeks of gestation who had a prior classical cesarean delivery or a low transverse cesarean delivery in the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample database. Outcome measures included mode of delivery, uterine rupture, and severe maternal morbidity (SMM), as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Maternal outcomes were compared using the χ2 test and the propensity score method, accounting for differences in patients' clinical risk factors. Multivariable regressions further assessed how patients' sociodemographic and hospital characteristics might influence the differences in maternal outcomes between the two groups.
The sample included 1,671,249 patients: 25,540 with prior classical cesarean delivery and 1,645,709 with prior low transverse cesarean delivery. Cesarean delivery occurred in 95.5% of patients with prior classical cesarean compared with 91.3% of those with prior low transverse delivery (P<.001; propensity score method: odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.85-1.16) and uterine rupture occurred in 1.1% and 0.3%, respectively (P<.001; propensity score method: OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.40-3.36). Among patients with prior classical cesarean delivery, uterine rupture occurred in 10.6% of those who underwent labor compared with 0.3% of those who did not (P<.001). Rates of SMM were 5.9% and 2.0% in the two groups, respectively (P<.001; propensity score method: OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.53-2.29). After adjustment of maternal sociodemographic and hospital characteristics, differences in the risk of uterine rupture and SMM between the two groups were attenuated but remained significant.
Prior classical cesarean delivery was associated with a higher risk of uterine rupture and SMM in subsequent pregnancies, compared with prior low transverse cesarean delivery, even after accounting for patients' clinical, sociodemographic, and hospital characteristics.
比较既往行经典式剖宫产术与既往行子宫下段横切口剖宫产术的患者再次妊娠的母婴结局。
我们对 2016 年至 2019 年全国住院患者样本数据库中妊娠 24 周及以上且既往有经典式剖宫产术或子宫下段横切口剖宫产术的活产单胎患者进行了一项横断面分析。结局指标包括分娩方式、子宫破裂和严重产妇并发症(SMM),其定义由疾病控制与预防中心制定。采用 χ2 检验和倾向评分法比较两组患者的母婴结局,并考虑了患者临床风险因素的差异。多变量回归进一步评估了患者的社会人口学和医院特征如何影响两组之间母婴结局的差异。
该样本包括 1671249 名患者:25540 名患者既往行经典式剖宫产术,1645709 名患者既往行子宫下段横切口剖宫产术。既往行经典式剖宫产术的患者中,剖宫产分娩的比例为 95.5%,而既往行子宫下段横切口剖宫产术的患者为 91.3%(P<.001;倾向评分法:比值比[OR]0.99,95%置信区间[CI]0.85-1.16),子宫破裂的比例分别为 1.1%和 0.3%(P<.001;倾向评分法:OR 2.17,95% CI 1.40-3.36)。在既往行经典式剖宫产术的患者中,行试产的患者中子宫破裂的发生率为 10.6%,而行剖宫产的患者为 0.3%(P<.001)。两组的 SMM 发生率分别为 5.9%和 2.0%(P<.001;倾向评分法:OR 1.87,95% CI 1.53-2.29)。调整产妇社会人口学和医院特征后,两组间子宫破裂和 SMM 风险的差异虽有所减弱,但仍具有统计学意义。
与既往行子宫下段横切口剖宫产术相比,既往行经典式剖宫产术与再次妊娠时子宫破裂和 SMM 的风险增加相关,即使考虑了患者的临床、社会人口学和医院特征。