Wang Bing, Yang Lizhen, Han Yuexing
School of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, People's Republic of China.
Phys Rev E. 2022 Jun;105(6-1):064305. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.064305.
Intervention strategies are of great significance for controlling large-scale outbreaks of epidemics. Since the spread of epidemic depends largely on the movement of individuals and the heterogeneity of the network structure, understanding potential factors that affect the epidemic is fundamental for the design of reasonable intervention strategies to suppress the epidemic. So far, most of previous studies mainly consider intervention strategies on the network composed of a single type of locations, while ignoring the movement behavior of individuals to and from locations that are composed of different types, i.e., residences and public places, which often presents heterogeneous structure. In addition, the transmission rate in public places with different population flows is heterogeneous. Inspired by the above observation, we build a bipartite metapopulation network model and propose intervention strategies based on the importance of public places. With the Markovian Chain approach, we derive the epidemic threshold under intervention strategies. Experimental results show that, compared with the uniform intervention to residences or public places, nonuniform intervention to public places is more effective for suppressing the epidemic with an increased epidemic threshold. Specifically, interventions to public places with large degree can further suppress the epidemic. Our study opens a new path for understanding the spatial epidemic spread and provides guidance for the design of intervention strategies for epidemics in the future.
干预策略对于控制大规模疫情爆发具有重要意义。由于疫情的传播很大程度上取决于个体的移动以及网络结构的异质性,了解影响疫情的潜在因素是设计合理干预策略以抑制疫情的基础。到目前为止,大多数先前的研究主要考虑由单一类型场所组成的网络上的干预策略,而忽略了个体在由不同类型场所(即住宅和公共场所)组成的场所之间的移动行为,这些场所通常呈现异质结构。此外,不同人流量的公共场所的传播率也是异质的。受上述观察结果的启发,我们构建了一个二分元种群网络模型,并基于公共场所的重要性提出了干预策略。通过马尔可夫链方法,我们推导了干预策略下的疫情阈值。实验结果表明,与对住宅或公共场所进行统一干预相比,对公共场所进行非统一干预在提高疫情阈值的情况下更有效地抑制疫情。具体而言,对度数大的公共场所进行干预可以进一步抑制疫情。我们的研究为理解空间疫情传播开辟了一条新途径,并为未来疫情干预策略的设计提供了指导。